Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Electro-mechanical engines of Perpetual Motion and Natural Selection
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 202 (28339)
01-03-2003 12:36 AM


About five such engines are shown at http://www.thewebspert.com/cresswell/.
I have put this information in the public domain because I have utter contempt for money and institutionalised 'educators'.
The taxpayer is forking out $300,000,000,000 per annum for oil to wreck their environment. At least the same again to have universities teach their children how to die stupid.
Have faith yes, but not in Gods, Isaac Newton or the Thermodynamic Laws.
I was surprised at the simplicity of the basic principle. Gobsmacked beyond belief to see Darwinian Natural Selection, leap from the surface of my notebooks.
------------------
Alan
[This message has been edited by Alan Cresswell, 01-03-2003]
[This message has been edited by Alan Cresswell, 01-03-2003]

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Percy, posted 01-03-2003 12:48 PM Alan Cresswell has replied
 Message 7 by Dr_Tazimus_maximus, posted 01-03-2003 5:09 PM Alan Cresswell has replied

  
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 202 (28360)
01-03-2003 2:41 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Percy
01-03-2003 12:48 PM


Are you proposing to wait until I make a 'billion' before you are willing to get your brain into gear and make a constructive comment ?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Percy, posted 01-03-2003 12:48 PM Percy has not replied

  
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 202 (28362)
01-03-2003 2:46 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Percy
01-03-2003 12:48 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Percipient:
While responding to w_fortenberry's advocacy for a geocentric solar system I once rhetorically asked why it was always the Creationists with the weird positions, but apparently Creationists have no such monopoly. Cresswell here apparently advocates Darwinian natural selection *and* abandonment of the laws of thermodynamics.
Alan, we'll believe you're on to something when you've made your first billion in the power generation industry.
--Percy

Are you poposing to wait until I make a billion of something before you get your brain into gear and say something constructive.
------------------
Alan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Percy, posted 01-03-2003 12:48 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Percy, posted 01-03-2003 4:16 PM Alan Cresswell has not replied

  
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 11 of 202 (28373)
01-03-2003 5:32 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Dr_Tazimus_maximus
01-03-2003 5:09 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Dr_Tazimus_maximus:
Hi Alan, I have only one comment for you concerning figure 1a.....
friction.

Hello Taz,
Have had Gaithersburg NIST dealings in the past. Almost signed up with them 14 years back. That was square one that triggered this. My heat engine cycle was too messy and gave a limited 33% free lunch.
Four years later I ionised the gas and everything fell out. Diagram 2. That was the big break for me. All else followed. I have 4d built today and will let you know how it goes. If the moderator does not pull the site. Indoctrinated kids often insult me in forums and I tend to overkick back.
1a. Friction? Thats it. Thats the output demand on the engine.
------------------
Alan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Dr_Tazimus_maximus, posted 01-03-2003 5:09 PM Dr_Tazimus_maximus has not replied

  
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 12 of 202 (28375)
01-03-2003 5:43 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Brad McFall
01-03-2003 5:13 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Brad McFall:
Yeah, I doubt the conditions would work wihout going against the surface in *nanoecology* as I have indicated in other threading lanes criticizing nanotechology. When billions are made then even Feynman would wake from his grave stomach killing virus. Taz- I am in Poolsville right now.
Feynman was a great communicator but I fear I would have made his stomach condition worse. We shall never know. I have tried in vain to contact some of his close surviving friends.
------------------
Alan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Brad McFall, posted 01-03-2003 5:13 PM Brad McFall has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by Brad McFall, posted 01-04-2003 12:51 AM Alan Cresswell has replied
 Message 18 by John, posted 01-05-2003 9:57 AM Alan Cresswell has not replied

  
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 14 of 202 (28433)
01-05-2003 3:01 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by Brad McFall
01-04-2003 12:51 AM


quote:
Originally posted by Brad McFall:
You could know that I only object to overly probalistic plausibilities when other more determinate possiblites are clearly avaiable. It is not impossible to build a pedagogy and some invention attempts cardinally into what I understood you have proposed but me coming at this from another direction have found that QM as some nanotechonoligsts have it is NOT AT ALL biologically motiviated such that "good elite intentions" or a philanthropic donation to your cause in another instance could create for the less educated revulsion if a food web collapses because after a frat inition some of the beer gets mixed with the brew. This is not possible to day but I do not play the lottery on the assumption that it could happen in 50yrs. Thanks for the response. I hope this helps.
I am sure that your comments will prove useful if and when I can get a translation. Are you saying that I should get nanoistically
unbosonized on a Higgsly programme? Are you aware of the hole in the bucket of QM theory? I give you facts not theories.
------------------
Alan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Brad McFall, posted 01-04-2003 12:51 AM Brad McFall has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Brad McFall, posted 01-05-2003 11:53 PM Alan Cresswell has not replied

  
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 202 (28435)
01-05-2003 3:23 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by Percy
01-03-2003 12:48 PM


Percy,
I have just read your black hole advice to Funky. Do black holes really exist to give out Hawking radiation and evaporate to nothing.
Surely the Universe is far more intelligent than this.
------------------
Alan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Percy, posted 01-03-2003 12:48 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by Percy, posted 01-05-2003 8:02 AM Alan Cresswell has replied

  
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 17 of 202 (28438)
01-05-2003 8:20 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by Percy
01-05-2003 8:02 AM


quote:
Originally posted by Percipient:
Hi Alan!
That would be off topic for this thread, but I'd be glad to respond if you want to post to that thread. I vaguely remember it, but not the title.
--Pecy

Hello Percy,
I dare not get in any deeper. Arready i Have a hudred knives in my back. Liverpool and Manchester City have just kicked off, in the FA Cup, on the box. I have just cracked a 6 pack and will not be in intellectual mode for 12 hours. We have 2mm of snow and the English clock has stopped until the great thaw.
------------------
Alan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Percy, posted 01-05-2003 8:02 AM Percy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Admin, posted 02-05-2003 1:43 PM Alan Cresswell has not replied

  
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 23 of 202 (31495)
02-06-2003 5:24 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by Dr Cresswell
02-05-2003 5:16 PM


I have a twin brother (Brian). He too is a PhD and master nuclear bombist, Methodist godIst and master apologist for Physics. He was dull compny in the womb.
A degree or PhD only guarantees unseemly arrogance and the characteristics of a clockwork parrot. The only thread you have broken is the slender one that keeps you off unemployment benefit.
You are clearly an addicted forum jockey in the Denial phase.
You dare not attempt a structured or scientific attempt at a critique of Diagrams 2, 2a, 3 because you will die like a washed up vaudeville comedian. You are wise to hop it to new pastures.
I am one Doppelganger you cannot mess with. It is indeed a strange world and will forever be so as long as you and your ilk strut the walkways of science.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Dr Cresswell, posted 02-05-2003 5:16 PM Dr Cresswell has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by Admin, posted 02-06-2003 8:47 AM Alan Cresswell has not replied
 Message 25 by Lurker, posted 02-06-2003 10:26 AM Alan Cresswell has replied
 Message 27 by Dr Cresswell, posted 02-06-2003 1:35 PM Alan Cresswell has replied

  
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 26 of 202 (31537)
02-06-2003 11:51 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by Lurker
02-06-2003 10:26 AM


Hello surfer. Maybe you could ask of the good Dr Cresswell why he does not make scientific comment of Diagrams 2, 2a and 3 at the website given at the head of this thread. Maybe you would have a go yourself. Get some help maybe.
The doctor has nothing whatsoever to say face to face with me. He cannot even comment constructively from within the relative safety of his Darwinian herd and the Forum time gap. He has gone to Forum fields anew. That is why Admin just slapped me to save his hide.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Lurker, posted 02-06-2003 10:26 AM Lurker has not replied

  
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 28 of 202 (31564)
02-06-2003 6:01 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by Dr Cresswell
02-06-2003 1:35 PM


You could not of course comment logically and scientifically on Diagrams 2 and 2a because for you it is just 'smoke and mirrors'. Your all too obvious euphemism for 'I cannot comprehend'.
Ok, go to diagrams 4a,4b,4c. A Gyro power torque engine. No thermo, no Faraday and no need to comprehend the physics of resonance. It is a toy gyro, advanced kindergarden. Please take your time and continue to work for a living. Is your work of practical benefit to the human race or simply for the benefit of your research facility.
I ask this because earth-asteroid collision experts claim a sense of responsibility.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Dr Cresswell, posted 02-06-2003 1:35 PM Dr Cresswell has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by Dr Cresswell, posted 02-06-2003 6:22 PM Alan Cresswell has replied

  
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 30 of 202 (31650)
02-07-2003 5:38 AM
Reply to: Message 29 by Dr Cresswell
02-06-2003 6:22 PM


The Energy produced by the gyros is far greater than the friction Power needed to raise it. Hard to see if you are paralysed by laughter. The question of 'efficiency' is covered in the text.
Try Diagram 8. PM in its most simplistic form.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Dr Cresswell, posted 02-06-2003 6:22 PM Dr Cresswell has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by Dr Cresswell, posted 02-07-2003 2:13 PM Alan Cresswell has replied

  
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 32 of 202 (32217)
02-14-2003 8:17 AM
Reply to: Message 31 by Dr Cresswell
02-07-2003 2:13 PM


I was not notified of this post but......
The 1st law is only 50% perfect. Newton only identifies force when IN PHASE with velocity. This is power not energy. The Bernoulli equation makes the same mistake.
When FORCE leads or lags VELOCITY by 90 degrees, the product is pure ENERGY.
The mistake can only be rectified by marrying the terms together in a cycle of RESONANCE.
This I have done. The result is shattering but inescapably true.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Dr Cresswell, posted 02-07-2003 2:13 PM Dr Cresswell has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by Dr Cresswell, posted 02-14-2003 1:09 PM Alan Cresswell has replied

  
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 34 of 202 (32263)
02-14-2003 1:34 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by Dr Cresswell
02-14-2003 1:09 PM


Newton knew nothing about thermodynamics. He never even possesed a thermometer. Joule simply assumed Newton would behave properly. He don't do he ?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Dr Cresswell, posted 02-14-2003 1:09 PM Dr Cresswell has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by Dr Cresswell, posted 02-14-2003 2:19 PM Alan Cresswell has replied

  
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 36 of 202 (32291)
02-14-2003 6:12 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by Dr Cresswell
02-14-2003 2:19 PM


All Quantum mechanics is WAVE by definition. Velocity of light C is the RMS value of a wave. Almost all physical identities are RMS.
Force leading or lagging velocity by 90 degrees is 100% ENERGY.
Newton falls flat here. He calls force in phase with velocity energy. No, No, No. It is power.
Only spin can lead or lag. I combine the two to make the first law of thermo correct and the second redundant.
This can only be done by the phenomena of resonance. Energy and power can only co-exist within a wave periodic time and the sky falls in on your beliefs.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Dr Cresswell, posted 02-14-2003 2:19 PM Dr Cresswell has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by wj, posted 02-14-2003 10:26 PM Alan Cresswell has replied
 Message 38 by Dr Cresswell, posted 02-15-2003 2:33 PM Alan Cresswell has replied
 Message 45 by Percy, posted 02-16-2003 10:21 AM Alan Cresswell has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024