Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,450 Year: 3,707/9,624 Month: 578/974 Week: 191/276 Day: 31/34 Hour: 12/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   YEC Problem with Science Above and Beyond Evolution
jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 192 of 312 (325860)
06-24-2006 9:38 PM
Reply to: Message 189 by Faith
06-24-2006 9:30 PM


Re: When did it happen.
Faith writes:
HOW ARE YOUR QUESTIONS AT ALL RELATED TO THE QUESTION OF HOW MUCH SCIENCE AS PRESENTLY PRACTICED IS HUNKY-DORY WITH YEC?????
Are you saying that what YEC basic premises are is unrelated to the difference between YECista stuff and Science?
My questions are directly related because, as I showed, genetics, physics, astronomy would all be impossible under YECista assumptions.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 189 by Faith, posted 06-24-2006 9:30 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 196 by Faith, posted 06-24-2006 9:48 PM jar has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 202 of 312 (325879)
06-24-2006 10:06 PM
Reply to: Message 195 by arachnophilia
06-24-2006 9:45 PM


Re: YECistas explain their terms?
Actually, how do you get from the YEC position of all the critters in the world fitting on a football field, to the variety and number we see today in only 4000 years without Hyper-Macro-evolution?
It is pretty obvious that neither Faith or any other YECista is going to answer any of the questions raised in this thread. So for the benefit of the lurkers, perhaps it would be worthwhile to simply do it for them.
The YEC position, unless some YECista shows up to correct me, seems to be that there was some flood about 4000 years ago that wiped out all the critters on earth 'cept a few on the big boat. The size seems to be an area about like a football field. It may have multiple decks so they may have two, even three football fields worth of critters.
This presents two problems that I can see which will mean we need to throw out everything we know about genetics.
First, to get from that small population to what we see today, we would need hypermacorevolution at rates that are really inconceivable. We have at that momnet 4000 years ago only the critters that would fit on the few football fields. Second in many cases we have no more than two of a kind, and except in one instance, never more than seven of a kind.
The second thing that will falsify our current understanding of genetics is that a bottleneck should show up among ALL species at about 4000 years ago. This should leave a single common ancestor between all of the critters in the world about 4000 years ago. It should point us to the original Kind directly.
But we don't see either of those things, no hypermacroevolution and no band of common ancestors at 4000 years ago in all current critters.
That means that our current genetic model has been falsified, or that there was not such an event 4000 years ago. Only one of those two can be correct.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 195 by arachnophilia, posted 06-24-2006 9:45 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 206 by Faith, posted 06-24-2006 10:21 PM jar has replied
 Message 207 by arachnophilia, posted 06-24-2006 10:26 PM jar has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 208 of 312 (325889)
06-24-2006 10:28 PM
Reply to: Message 206 by Faith
06-24-2006 10:21 PM


Bullshit TO THE MAX
Bull shit Faith.
Or are you saying that the alleged Flood is not part of the YEC position, even though YOU have used it numerous times in this very thread?
Let's go back to Message 57.
Is some creation event part of the YEC position or not? If so, when did it happen?
Is the so called Fall part of the YEC position? If so when did it happen.
Is the Flood part of the YEC position? If so when did it happen?
This is getting just TOO funny. So the Flood is OT Faith? Then how come you said
Faith writes:
Which to a YEC means nothing other than that birds were not hanging about with the dinosaurs at the time of the Flood and got caught in a different wave.
in Message 209?
Edited by jar, : add a quote from DerFaith

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 206 by Faith, posted 06-24-2006 10:21 PM Faith has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 214 of 312 (325898)
06-24-2006 10:40 PM
Reply to: Message 212 by Coragyps
06-24-2006 10:34 PM


Re: assessment at this point
Okay Cora.
Please indulge me and lets look at an example in geology like those I mentioned in physics, astronomy and genetics.
Assume (we can't get a YEC to confirm) that the basics are that creation happened some 6000 years ago. About 5990 years ago some kinda something called a Fall happened and since then Physics and genetics etal have been just as we see them now.
The about 4000 years ago there was some flood.
If those things are true, what would we see.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 212 by Coragyps, posted 06-24-2006 10:34 PM Coragyps has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 224 of 312 (325914)
06-24-2006 11:08 PM
Reply to: Message 221 by Buzsaw
06-24-2006 10:59 PM


Re: Creo Scientists
buz writes:
Again, Regardless of ideology on origins, Christians and Secularists alike use the same technology applicable to the industry.
Strawman and also incorrect Buz. To say that Christians and Secularists both work in science has nothing to do with either YECistas or Biblical Creationsist.
Of course Christians and secularists work within the same science, as long as they reject the nonsense of Biblical Creationism and YECism.
Christian does not equal either YEC or Biblical Creationist.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 221 by Buzsaw, posted 06-24-2006 10:59 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 227 by Faith, posted 06-24-2006 11:17 PM jar has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 228 of 312 (325919)
06-24-2006 11:18 PM
Reply to: Message 222 by Faith
06-24-2006 11:02 PM


Re: Design, not descent
I wonder what Adam and Eve looked like. Every single human type came from them. Every skin color, every hair type, every size and shape from the pygmy to the Neanderthal to the giants of the Bible. Actually all that came from NOAH and his family. Wonder what HE looked like.
Okay, some questions.
When the alleged Fall happened were Adam and Eve the only humans?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 222 by Faith, posted 06-24-2006 11:02 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 233 by Faith, posted 06-24-2006 11:34 PM jar has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 235 of 312 (325933)
06-24-2006 11:35 PM
Reply to: Message 227 by Faith
06-24-2006 11:17 PM


On Christians
Just a word of Love for you.
Remember that both Arach and I are still Christians, with as great a faith in GOD and the Bible as you. The issue that divides us is not Christianity or belief in a common GOD or even the idea that this Universe is the creation of that GOD.
If you are approaching a crisis of Faith, if the volume of specific evidence that excludes YECism or the Flood, remember that the choice is not Christianity or Old Earth and Evolution. You do NOT have to abandon your faith, only those misconceptions that are holding you back.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 227 by Faith, posted 06-24-2006 11:17 PM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 236 by arachnophilia, posted 06-24-2006 11:44 PM jar has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 238 of 312 (325938)
06-24-2006 11:45 PM
Reply to: Message 233 by Faith
06-24-2006 11:34 PM


Re: Design, not descent
Jar asked:
When the alleged Fall happened were Adam and Eve the only humans?
to which Faith replied:
Yes.
Okay.
Do you agree that it was at the Fall when the changes in physics or genetics or all the other laws changed?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 233 by Faith, posted 06-24-2006 11:34 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 243 by Faith, posted 06-24-2006 11:58 PM jar has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 245 of 312 (325949)
06-25-2006 12:04 AM
Reply to: Message 243 by Faith
06-24-2006 11:58 PM


Re: Design, not descent
Well, you said that genetic potential was greater before the Fall, is that correct?
You also have said that things like radioactive decay changed at the Fall.
Now you need to go into some specifics.
There is no Biblical support that I know of for any changing things at the Flood.
This is the problem Faith. You seem unable to tell us what the hell the YEC position is, when things happened, what happened, in fact NOTHING of any significance.
Faith writes:
NO LAWS changed EVER as far as I know. I said that I thought.
CONDITIONS changed. Changed at the Fall, changed at the Flood, both.
So are you now saying that radioactive decay did not change at the Fall?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 243 by Faith, posted 06-24-2006 11:58 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 249 by Faith, posted 06-25-2006 12:23 AM jar has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 246 of 312 (325950)
06-25-2006 12:09 AM
Reply to: Message 244 by Faith
06-25-2006 12:01 AM


Re: that same old deception again
What causes all this contention is Science's daring to claim there was no Flood and that human beings descended from the primordial ooze along with everything else.
Science doesn't claim there was no flood, it is GOD's creation, the universe that claims there was no flood. Argue with GOD, he is the one that created the evidence.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 244 by Faith, posted 06-25-2006 12:01 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 250 by MangyTiger, posted 06-25-2006 12:27 AM jar has not replied
 Message 251 by Faith, posted 06-25-2006 12:30 AM jar has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 254 of 312 (325964)
06-25-2006 12:38 AM
Reply to: Message 249 by Faith
06-25-2006 12:23 AM


Re: Design, not descent
Faith writes:
I believe I said conditions might have been appreciably different than they are now so that decay rate would be very different than a uniformitarian assumption would dictate.
Okay, so are you saying that the decay rates changed at the fall? That really is just a yes or no question.
The Flood would of course have eliminated a LOT of genetic potentials from all Kinds.
Why? Every KIND was on the boat. Is that correct? So how would the flood eliminate genetic potential?
And we agree that at the time of the Fall Adam and Eve were the only humans.
The flood by the way eliminated all of the races except for eight people IIRC. So it doesn't much matter if there were other races before the flood, and races existing after the flood have to be descendants and descendents of Noah and company.
Is that correct?
jar said:
You seem unable to tell us what the hell the YEC position is, when things happened, what happened, in fact NOTHING of any significance.
to which Faith retorted:
Who said I'm unable? Your demanding that on this thread is off topic and bullying as usual. I was doing some decent work supporting the YEC position on everyday science in relation to the OP list of sciences before you decided to derail it.
How can it be off topic if the topic is "YEC Problem with Science Above and Beyond Evolution?"

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 249 by Faith, posted 06-25-2006 12:23 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 259 by Faith, posted 06-25-2006 12:48 AM jar has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 258 of 312 (325968)
06-25-2006 12:47 AM
Reply to: Message 251 by Faith
06-25-2006 12:30 AM


Re: that same old deception again
Faith writes:
You actually think that YOUR OWN JUDGMENT of the evidence IS the evidence.
No Faith, that is not what we think at all. The evidence is the evidence. The fact is that every line of evidence refutes the idea that there was a flood 4000 years ago.
We have pointed out to you the evidence that GOD gave us. GOD says that there wasn't a flood.
If there was a flood where the only critters in the world that survived would fit on one or a few football fields, we should see
  • a genetic bottleneck common to all critters all dating to about 4000 years ago
  • hypermacroevolution to create the variety we see today, particularly in humans
  • a single flood layer easily identifiable all over the world
Those are just a few of the things specifically related to the alleged flood.
But GOD left no such evidence. GOD says that there was no worldwide flood 4000 years ago.
But that's okay, GOD says that there wasn't a Fall 5990 years ago too.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 251 by Faith, posted 06-25-2006 12:30 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 262 by Faith, posted 06-25-2006 12:54 AM jar has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 261 of 312 (325972)
06-25-2006 12:54 AM
Reply to: Message 259 by Faith
06-25-2006 12:48 AM


Re: Design, not descent
You are changing it into YOUR problem with YEC it appears. The topic is to what extent the YEC position supports or contradicts existing science. You are just running some kind of rabbit trail away from this topic.
I have no real problem with thae YEC position, we cannot get anyone to tell us what it is so it's hard to have a problem with it.
The way a bottleneck always does. Or any selection event for that matter.
So you agree that we should be able to see such a bottleneck?
You agree that since EVERY creature living is descended from those few critters that were on the boat, that bottleneck should show a most distant common ancestor about 4000 years ago?
Is that correct?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 259 by Faith, posted 06-25-2006 12:48 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 263 by Faith, posted 06-25-2006 12:56 AM jar has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 269 of 312 (325980)
06-25-2006 1:04 AM
Reply to: Message 262 by Faith
06-25-2006 12:54 AM


Re: that same old deception again
The multilayered geological column is EXACTLY what would be expected from a worldwide flood, not some "single flood layer."
You have had opportunities to support that assertion, in fact there is a thread on the Grand Canyon where you are welcome to explain how the flood can create the individual layers see there.
"Hypermacroevolution" is some kind of made-up nonsense. All the variety we see today is easily accounted for by normal reproduction starting with very great original genetic potentials in each Kind on the ark.
Now that just sounds really silly Faith. Is it possible to assemble from two to seven of every species currently alive as well as an assortment of humans and fit them all into one or even a few football fields?
Faith, to get from what the Bible says was left to what we see today can only be done with some bodacious hypermacroevolution.
There was such a bottleneck. Perhaps you have wrong expectations about what would be evidence of it.
OKAY!
Very important point. You agree that current genetics does not show the bottleneck when it should. Thank you, you have refuted current genetic theories and practice.
So now according to you we need to throw out:
  • astronomy
  • genetics
  • and IIRC Paleoclimatology as well as
  • Palaeontology
Shall we go on?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 262 by Faith, posted 06-25-2006 12:54 AM Faith has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 270 of 312 (325981)
06-25-2006 1:07 AM
Reply to: Message 263 by Faith
06-25-2006 12:56 AM


Re: Design, not descent
No I don't expect you to be able to see it. I think probably what is considered to be evidence of such things is far from reliable that far back. Or there is evidence but you don't recognize it.
It's not that far back Faith. The Flood you are talking about is more recent than the Pyramids, about 5000 years more recent than the earliest buildings at Jerico, over 20,000 years more recent than the Venus of Willendorf, at least 10,000 years more recent than the Topper settlement.
Four thousand years is almost yesterday.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 263 by Faith, posted 06-25-2006 12:56 AM Faith has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024