|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Opinions and conclusions about Religion and God. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
ramoss Member (Idle past 639 days) Posts: 3228 Joined: |
Funny thing about that.
There are many places in the New Testament that talk about BY THEIR WORKS. Doesn't say a thing about 'faith alone'. That 'alone' was added by Martin Luthor. When it was pointed out that it the bible didn't say 'BY faith alone', he retorted' It should have. Yet, the sheep and the goats are seperated by their works. And, of course, the Gospel of James is very specific about that.
"Was not our ancestor Abraham considered righteous for what he did when he offered his son Isaac on the altar? You see that his faith and his actions were working together, and his faith was made complete by what he did. And the scripture was fulfilled that says, 'Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness,' and he was called God's friend. You see that a person is justified by what he does and not by faith alone." --James 2:21-24
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
iano Member (Idle past 1968 days) Posts: 6165 From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland. Joined: |
Yet, the sheep and the goats are seperated by their works. Option 1: Works the cause of them being deemed sheep. Option 2: Works a consequence of them being sheep in the first place. You say 1 - I say 2. No conclusion based on this passage.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
PurpleYouko Member Posts: 714 From: Columbia Missouri Joined: |
Iano writes: No conclusion based on this passage. James writes:
Looks pretty specific to me. You see that a person is justified by what he does and not by faith alone." --James 2:21-24You can read? Right?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
lfen Member (Idle past 4704 days) Posts: 2189 From: Oregon Joined: |
"You see that a person is justified by what he does and not by faith alone." --James 2:21-24"
Ian, This is the statement that needs addressing. I read James as saying that faith is neccesary but not sufficient. That both doing AND faith are required. How do you read it? lfen
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
iano Member (Idle past 1968 days) Posts: 6165 From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland. Joined: |
Looks pretty specific to me. Your doing the same that the Matthew 25-ists do. Taking a verse out of context and forming a doctrine around it. When people say you can make the Bible say anything at all they are referring to this kind of thing. Here we have the same thing as I suggested is the dilemma contained in some folks analysis of Matthew 25.(which contains some interesting litte nuggests which causes HMS Works to list even more). Are we speaking cause or consequence. The link below makes the full argument of what James is dealing with in the passage: useless faith (even the demons believe in God) compared to saving faith. If a person has genuine faith then good works will follow: consequence. The saved person is a sheep, they will hear his voice - consequence The saved person loves Jesus, they will obey his commands - consequence
Carm.org writes: James is simply saying that if you ”say' you are a Christian, then there had better be some appropriate works manifested or your faith is false. This sentiment is echoed in 1 John 2:4 which says, "If you say you have come to know Him, yet you do not keep His commandments, then the truth is not in you and you are a liar." Apparently, there were people who were saying they were Christians, but were not manifesting any of the fruit of Christianity. Can this faith justify? Can the dead ”faith' that someone has which produces no change in a person and no good works before men and God be a faith that justifies? Absolutely not. It is not merely enough to say you believe in Jesus. You must actually believe and trust in Him. If you actually do, then you will demonstrate that faith by a changed and godly life. If not, then your profession is of no more value than the same profession of demons: "We believe Jesus lived." the complete article Edited by iano, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
iano Member (Idle past 1968 days) Posts: 6165 From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland. Joined: |
The post above gives the basic argument. The position is that on being saved a person received Gods holy spirit in dwelling. The purpose and activity of the Spirits indwellng is to cause us, the grafted-to-the-root(Jesus) branches to produce good fruit (works). The root is the source of the fruit - the branches are vehicles for bearing it.
Philipians 2 writes: 12Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling; 13for it is God who works in you both to will and to do for His good pleasure A Christian is to work out (express out, exude out) what God is working into them. And if they are Christians then this will happen. It is a promise
Phillipians 1:6 writes: Being confident of this very thing, that he which hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ: These sheep may go astray, they may get entangled in the briars of sin. But the good shepherd will go find them and bring them back into the fold.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
PurpleYouko Member Posts: 714 From: Columbia Missouri Joined: |
Your doing the same that the Matthew 25-ists do. Taking a verse out of context and forming a doctrine around it. When people say you can make the Bible say anything at all they are referring to this kind of thing.
Can't you see that you are doing exactly the same thing in the other direction? There are plenty of places in the bible that back up the view of works alone too. Everybody just seems to pick bits that agree with the way they see it to be and just ignore the rest.I came up with a number of articles (from both sides of the argument) that all shared one theme. That theme is that the bible is God's word and is therefore inerrant and infallible so no matter what the authors appear to be saying, they must actually be agreeing with each other. We just have to figure out how. I find the whole thing laughable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ramoss Member (Idle past 639 days) Posts: 3228 Joined: |
Well, that is CARM's arguement.
Of course, they are starting with a certain viewpoint. If I look at Jame's writing alone, I do not get the message that Carm says it says. It just goes to show that CARM's basic premise that the bible does not contradict itself is wrong. The Gospel of James has a much more Jewish attitude towards faith and work the Romans. That , actually, gives credulance to the theory that Paul was NOT actually a pharasee.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
iano Member (Idle past 1968 days) Posts: 6165 From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland. Joined: |
oops wrong thread - deleted
Edited by iano, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
PurpleYouko Member Posts: 714 From: Columbia Missouri Joined: |
oops wrong thread - deleted
That's alright. i managed to read it before you deleted it and was about to point that out to you.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024