Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
9 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,465 Year: 3,722/9,624 Month: 593/974 Week: 206/276 Day: 46/34 Hour: 2/6


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

The definition of science: What should it be?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The definition of science: What should it be?
AdminPD
Inactive Administrator

Normal Thread Display
Message 94 of 100 (327476)
06-29-2006 11:27 AM 		Reply to: Message 92 by Rob
06-29-2006 10:23 AM

Warning - Rob
Rob,
​
If you have a comment concerning a moderator action, please take it to the appropriate thread.
​
PurpleDawn is not a particpant in this thread, so posting an inane message for PurpleDawn in this thread is a wasteful post and does not further this discussion, which is against forum guidelines.
​
If you are unable to keep your thread on track, then I will close it down.
​
All other participants, please refrain from useless one-liners.
​
Usually, in a well-conducted debate, speakers are either emotionally uncommitted or can preserve sufficient detachment to maintain a coolly academic approach.-- Encylopedia Brittanica, on debate
Links for comments on moderation procedures and/or responding to admin msgs:
  • General discussion of moderation procedures
  • Thread Reopen Requests
  • Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
    ​
    Helpful links for New Members:
    Forum Guidelines, [thread=-19,-112], [thread=-17,-45], and Practice Makes Perfect
    • This message is a reply to:
     Message 92 by Rob, posted 06-29-2006 10:23 AM Rob has not replied
      
    Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
    Timezone: ET (US)
      
    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024