I don't see how science could ever accept creationism. Science only accepts concepts that are based on the scientific method. Even if all scientists accepted it, creationism would still be no more than the religious beliefs of those scientists.
Creationists seem to be trying to find evidence for something that people once accepted without question.
But the question is why....
It's about power. Throughout history religion has had a monopoly on truth. Any edict by a religious leader was deemed to be unchallengeable. Science is antithesis to religious dogma because it requires that you "show the sidework". Science is a major component of modern societies and it is a domain where religion does not have dominion. So do creationists reject science? Obviously not.. but they do not just want to accept it , they want to control it , they want to make sure is doesn't conradict any of their beliefs. Have you noticed that creationists are only interested in science that contradicts their interpretation of the Bible?
If they find no evidence, they will have faith to fall back on. If they find evidence, it wouldn't kill God, it would only kill faith, the significance of which would be altered greatly.
But if you kill faith, you have effective kill God( atleast the supernatural variant). Can God exist without faith?
Edited by honda33, : No reason given.
Edited by honda33, : No reason given.
™ Version 4.2
