Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,385 Year: 3,642/9,624 Month: 513/974 Week: 126/276 Day: 23/31 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Right to Life Ethical Considerations
2ice_baked_taters
Member (Idle past 5871 days)
Posts: 566
From: Boulder Junction WI.
Joined: 02-16-2006


Message 106 of 300 (327565)
06-29-2006 6:44 PM
Reply to: Message 102 by nator
06-29-2006 5:22 PM


Re: I await answers to my questions, taters.
..and yet there are those who would have chosen to continue with the pregnancy (except for a tubal pregnancy), despite the risks. You chose abortion.
There are even those who will continue with this.
So, what you are saying is that you alone are fit to judge what is a good enough reason for everyone who seeks out an abortion.
I simply pointed out the motivations and reasons. It got a few peoples dander up You apparently have Big Brother syndrome.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by nator, posted 06-29-2006 5:22 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 108 by nator, posted 06-29-2006 9:11 PM 2ice_baked_taters has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2190 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 107 of 300 (327605)
06-29-2006 8:59 PM
Reply to: Message 104 by 2ice_baked_taters
06-29-2006 6:24 PM


Re: The right to (wretched) life
So, do you oppose IUD's?
quote:
I personally do not agree with them. I would not be involved with someone who ues them.
That is consistent with your position.
Do you suggest that we collect and search the menstrual fluid of all women and girls of child brearing age, since most fertilized eggs fail to implant in the uterus and are therefore dischardged from the woman's body?
quote:
I do not believe I mentioned anything of the kind. You have twice now.
It appears to be your issue.
But your position, that human life begins at conception, is the reason I posed the question.
If most fertilized eggs, aka "the begining of human life", are flushed out of the body with menstruation, why shouldn't we try to save them?
quote:
When the theoretical eggs you speak of are collected and raised into children then we'll talk more.
You are sidestepping the issue.
The eggs are not "theoretical". It is a fact that most fertilized eggs never implant and are flushed out during menstruation.
Do you think it's a good idea to try to save that human life or not?
quote:
Otherwise your talking theory. I say they did not implant becasue they were not viable.
Possibly, but it is also possible that perfectly viable fertilized eggs just missed the wall of the uterus. Or, the woman was stressed or not eating well and her body prevented her from allowing a perfectly viable fertilized egg from implanting. Perhaps she has a physical problem in which perfectly viable fertilized eggs cannot ever implant.
We do not know, anyway, if those fertilized eggs are viable or not until we collect them.
Don't you want to give all of that human life, that some people would give their lives for, the benefit of the doubt?
Also, do you support the death penalty?
quote:
This is a sepparate issue you are welcome to discuss in another forum.
No, it is the same issue.
You keep going on about supporting the "ending of a life".
If one supports the death penalty, one certainly does support the "ending of a life".
If you are going to insist upon simplistic, black and white ways of thinking about these issues, then you should be prepared to be presented with the logical consequences of those ways of thinking.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 06-29-2006 6:24 PM 2ice_baked_taters has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2190 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 108 of 300 (327606)
06-29-2006 9:11 PM
Reply to: Message 106 by 2ice_baked_taters
06-29-2006 6:44 PM


Re: I await answers to my questions, taters.
..and yet there are those who would have chosen to continue with the pregnancy (except for a tubal pregnancy), despite the risks. You chose abortion.
quote:
There are even those who will continue with this.
Exactly.
Does that mean that because you made the choice to end the pregnancy instead of possibly sacrifice the mother's life and/or bring a severely ill infant into the world, you threw away the "lump of flesh" into the "trash"?
Or is it different for you? Your reasons for getting the abortion were "good enough", and you are fit to judge if anyone else's reasons are good enough?
So, what you are saying is that you alone are fit to judge what is a good enough reason for everyone who seeks out an abortion.
quote:
I simply pointed out the motivations and reasons. It got a few peoples dander up You apparently have Big Brother syndrome.
No, you simplistically painted everyone with, according to your personal judgement, "inadequate" reasons to to end an unwanted pregnancy as irresponsible, immoral, and as not valuing human life in the least.
None of this is true, except in your black and white, self righteous imagination.
If a woman becomes pregnant as a result of a rape and obtains an abortion, do you consider it OK for her to throw that "lump of flesh" in the trash?
Since nothing but complete abstinence from intercourse will prevent unwanted pregnancy 100%, do you suggest that all married couples should abstain from intercourse if they do not want the wife to become pregnant?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 06-29-2006 6:44 PM 2ice_baked_taters has not replied

U can call me Cookie
Member (Idle past 4973 days)
Posts: 228
From: jo'burg, RSA
Joined: 11-15-2005


Message 109 of 300 (327684)
06-30-2006 5:24 AM
Reply to: Message 101 by 2ice_baked_taters
06-29-2006 12:09 PM


Re: The right to (wretched) life
This would be your take. I however never said that. If there is a "reason" for sex, that is a whole other topic that must be spoken of from the pespective of a higher power.
Reasons to have sex are individually based. You have sex and get pleasure, bonding, std's, life, responsibility, abortion.
Granted, you never explicitly stated this, however, it certainly seemed implicit to your argument against contraception.
I fail to see why a higher power must be invoked regarding reasons for sex.
With topics such as this i think it would be a good idea to be more precise with your phrasing. While pleasure, bonding and procreation could be regarded as reasons for having sex; i wouldn't put STDs and abortion, within that group. These are potential consequences of sex, not reasons for it. Even procreation could arguably be viewed as sitting on on overlap between reason and consequence.
I struck a personal chord when I stated my view that a choice of sex over that of life was imature. If one falls into #2 this should not be offensive at all. Just state that it's not life and it's the end of the conversation.
I can easily see why such a statement would be considered offensive, whether or not one views the foetus as a person or not. Such a statement is a generalisation based on your subjectiove assumptions of what constitutes maturity.
Not so. It is human life. We are not discussing anything else. I put it "tastefully" with respect to the value expressed to me. I have not been corected as of yet, If this is the case. No one has spoken of how they value this except crash and I.
Ahhh... thats a little clearer. Human life. I'm sure you agree then, that your view of what constitutes human life is not universal. Debate abounds on this issue.
I feel tho', that your view is a little simplistic. A person has rights, but when these rights infringe on the rights of another, then things get messy.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 06-29-2006 12:09 PM 2ice_baked_taters has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 114 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 07-06-2006 12:12 AM U can call me Cookie has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2190 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 110 of 300 (328741)
07-04-2006 12:11 PM


bump for taters
bumpety-bump

Replies to this message:
 Message 112 by nator, posted 07-05-2006 7:39 AM nator has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1487 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 111 of 300 (328832)
07-04-2006 6:03 PM
Reply to: Message 101 by 2ice_baked_taters
06-29-2006 12:09 PM


Re: The right to (wretched) life
Crash I am sure sees my view as extreme.
If you're not going to talk to me, you don't get to talk about me.
Misrepresenting my position after retreating from debate with me is dishonest and cowardly, and you typefy the immaturity inherent in the sexual views you espouse.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 06-29-2006 12:09 PM 2ice_baked_taters has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 07-05-2006 11:48 PM crashfrog has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2190 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 112 of 300 (328890)
07-05-2006 7:39 AM
Reply to: Message 110 by nator
07-04-2006 12:11 PM


Re: bump for taters
bump

This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by nator, posted 07-04-2006 12:11 PM nator has not replied

2ice_baked_taters
Member (Idle past 5871 days)
Posts: 566
From: Boulder Junction WI.
Joined: 02-16-2006


Message 113 of 300 (329145)
07-05-2006 11:48 PM
Reply to: Message 111 by crashfrog
07-04-2006 6:03 PM


Re: The right to (wretched) life
I will not respond to you if you continue to flame.
The sexual issue is yours. Not mine. You are a very sexually fixated person.If you make it purely a womans issue that is your choice. I do not view it that way. I will continue to ignore any imature insinuation that that is the case. I simply will not tollerate the sexual fixations you spout. They do not apply and again are your issue.
Again my position is simple. To have sex knowing the statistics and whining about the consequences is simply an imature choice.If a person doesn't want an abortion then don't have sex if you are not ready. If a person knows they will regret the choice of abortion then they are setting themselves up for a fall. Countless people do. Poor me...I chose abortion...now I feel bad. No kidding. The large majority of abortion choices fall into my observation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by crashfrog, posted 07-04-2006 6:03 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 115 by crashfrog, posted 07-06-2006 12:29 AM 2ice_baked_taters has replied
 Message 117 by nator, posted 07-06-2006 9:04 AM 2ice_baked_taters has replied

2ice_baked_taters
Member (Idle past 5871 days)
Posts: 566
From: Boulder Junction WI.
Joined: 02-16-2006


Message 114 of 300 (329148)
07-06-2006 12:12 AM
Reply to: Message 109 by U can call me Cookie
06-30-2006 5:24 AM


Re: The right to (wretched) life
Granted, you never explicitly stated this, however, it certainly seemed implicit to your argument against contraception.
I fail to see why a higher power must be invoked regarding reasons for sex.
I agree. That is simply the way it appeared you represented it to me.
I feel tho', that your view is a little simplistic. A person has rights, but when these rights infringe on the rights of another, then things get messy
An infringement as I understand would be a person making a decission that has a detrimental effect upon another.
In the circumstance we are discussing first of all it depends on whether or not individuals view the unborn as life or not. If one views it as simply a lump of flesh to be discarded there is no debate.
That is not the case in most instances. In this majority an unborn does not have a choice therefore there is no infingement. It is those who choose to set themselves up for a fall that infinge upon themselves and the unborn.
Again if one does not see life lost then there is no issue.
Go to clinics some time and read the affidavits. My understanding of what takes place the majority of the time is quite accurate. It is sad to see people hurt themeselves like that. The personal stakes are high for the little pleasure that is had.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by U can call me Cookie, posted 06-30-2006 5:24 AM U can call me Cookie has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by nator, posted 07-06-2006 9:19 AM 2ice_baked_taters has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1487 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 115 of 300 (329153)
07-06-2006 12:29 AM
Reply to: Message 113 by 2ice_baked_taters
07-05-2006 11:48 PM


Re: The right to (wretched) life
I do not view it that way.
You don't view abortion as an issue that predominantly affects women?
Did nobody explain to you how pregnancy works, or what? Look, it's rather ridiculous of you to be lecturing sexual mores when you don't apparently understand where babies come from.
If a person knows they will regret the choice of abortion then they are setting themselves up for a fall. Countless people do. Poor me...I chose abortion...now I feel bad. No kidding. The large majority of abortion choices fall into my observation.
So, abortion is ok as long as you don't feel bad afterwards? Funny, before, you were certain that the worst thing was when women had abortions lightly, without feeling bad about it.
Which is it, exactly? Why is it that you describe your position as "simple", but it appears to change in every post?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 07-05-2006 11:48 PM 2ice_baked_taters has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 07-06-2006 1:27 AM crashfrog has replied

2ice_baked_taters
Member (Idle past 5871 days)
Posts: 566
From: Boulder Junction WI.
Joined: 02-16-2006


Message 116 of 300 (329174)
07-06-2006 1:27 AM
Reply to: Message 115 by crashfrog
07-06-2006 12:29 AM


Re: The right to (wretched) life
You don't view abortion as an issue that predominantly affects women?
No.
Did nobody explain to you how pregnancy works, or what? Look, it's rather ridiculous of you to be lecturing sexual mores when you don't apparently understand where babies come from.
Again, you need to refrain from such childish comments.
I have lectured no one. Sex is not the issue. It is your issue.
Children come from a choice.
So, abortion is ok as long as you don't feel bad afterwards?
For those who think it is no big deal it will remain no big deal.
It's "ok"ness is irelevant to them.
Funny, before, you were certain that the worst thing was when women had abortions lightly, without feeling bad about it.
I personally am saddened by that view. However I will not convince someone of that mindset otherwise. I have however seen countless examples of regret. These are people who convinced themselves it was a good choice. An adult thing. For the majority of people it was not. Hence the regret. That is not a lecture that is simpe accurate observation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 115 by crashfrog, posted 07-06-2006 12:29 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 118 by nator, posted 07-06-2006 9:12 AM 2ice_baked_taters has not replied
 Message 121 by crashfrog, posted 07-07-2006 8:41 AM 2ice_baked_taters has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2190 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 117 of 300 (329259)
07-06-2006 9:04 AM
Reply to: Message 113 by 2ice_baked_taters
07-05-2006 11:48 PM


Re: The right to (wretched) life
quote:
If a person doesn't want an abortion then don't have sex if you are not ready.
So, is a married couple which doesn't want a pregnancy but engages in intercourse after one or both of them have been sterilized being irresponsible, since even sterilization does not confer 100% protection against unwanted pregnancy?
quote:
If a person knows they will regret the choice of abortion then they are setting themselves up for a fall.
I concur.
quote:
Countless people do.
Really? Got any statistics which shows this to be true?
quote:
Poor me...I chose abortion...now I feel bad. No kidding. The large majority of abortion choices fall into my observation.
Actually, multiple studies show that most women who get abortions tend to feel relief as the major emotion following the procedure.
People who have emotional problems after an abortion are those who had strong religious or personal objections to abortion before they had the procedure done.
Now, are you going to answer my questions regarding your position?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 07-05-2006 11:48 PM 2ice_baked_taters has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 120 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 07-06-2006 8:12 PM nator has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2190 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 118 of 300 (329260)
07-06-2006 9:12 AM
Reply to: Message 116 by 2ice_baked_taters
07-06-2006 1:27 AM


Re: The right to (wretched) life
quote:
I have lectured no one.
Hahaha. That's funny that you think that.
quote:
Children come from choice.
Children come from sex which results in a pregnancy that is carried to term and birthed.
Of course, a pregnancy can result from consentual sex or from rape.
Why is it OK to throw away a "lump of flesh" in the trash in the latter case but not the former?
quote:
However I will not convince someone of that mindset otherwise. I have however seen countless examples of regret. These are people who convinced themselves it was a good choice. An adult thing. For the majority of people it was not. Hence the regret. That is not a lecture that is simpe accurate observation.
Again, your anecdotal, highly biased observations don't mean much.
Do you have any statistics or studies which show that most people who get abortions regret them? The studies I have seen report that the majority of women feel relief after abortion and not regret,

This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 07-06-2006 1:27 AM 2ice_baked_taters has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2190 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 119 of 300 (329262)
07-06-2006 9:19 AM
Reply to: Message 114 by 2ice_baked_taters
07-06-2006 12:12 AM


Re: The right to (wretched) life
quote:
In the circumstance we are discussing first of all it depends on whether or not individuals view the unborn as life or not.
No, that is inaccurate.
It depends upon in individuals view the fetus as human or not.
It is alive, just as your steak you had last night used to be alive.
quote:
If one views it as simply a lump of flesh to be discarded there is no debate.
So, why is it OK, according to you, for a woman who becomes pregnant as a result of a rape to "discard" this "lump of flesh"?
quote:
That is not the case in most instances.
Care to back up this assertion?
quote:
In this majority an unborn does not have a choice therefore there is no infingement. It is those who choose to set themselves up for a fall that infinge upon themselves and the unborn.
This doesn't really make much sense.
Also, aren't the fertilized eggs which fail to implant and are flushed out of girl's and women's bodies during menstruation also "the unborn"?
Why do you not advocate collecting them and trying to save them?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 07-06-2006 12:12 AM 2ice_baked_taters has not replied

2ice_baked_taters
Member (Idle past 5871 days)
Posts: 566
From: Boulder Junction WI.
Joined: 02-16-2006


Message 120 of 300 (329488)
07-06-2006 8:12 PM
Reply to: Message 117 by nator
07-06-2006 9:04 AM


Re: The right to (wretched) life
So, is a married couple which doesn't want a pregnancy but engages in intercourse after one or both of them have been sterilized being irresponsible, since even sterilization does not confer 100% protection against unwanted pregnancy?
If an unborn child is of value then the outcome will be something you have to live with. It was a risk. If you do not recognise the life the point is mute. There is no responsibility involved. Nothing was at stake.
Really? Got any statistics which shows this to be true?
I would wager I have read more personal affidavits then you will ever likely lay eyes on.
Actually, multiple studies show that most women who get abortions tend to feel relief as the major emotion following the procedure.
That is no surprise. They percieve a burdon has been lifted. Very often one burdon is exchanged for another. Follow these same people as time goes by and see how many come to feel a ssense of loss and suffer depression. This burdon also tends to last a lifetime. You can't change it. What about the men?
People who have emotional problems after an abortion are those who had strong religious or personal objections to abortion before they had the procedure done.
While this generalization is true you will find that as time passes people who were ok with abortion tend to change thier opinion as they age. I have met many. I have yet to meet a person who's opinion has shifted in the other direction as they age.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by nator, posted 07-06-2006 9:04 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 124 by nator, posted 07-08-2006 8:36 PM 2ice_baked_taters has replied
 Message 125 by nator, posted 07-08-2006 8:43 PM 2ice_baked_taters has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024