|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Discussion on Creation article... | |||||||||||||||||||||||
MangyTiger Member (Idle past 6381 days) Posts: 989 From: Leicester, UK Joined: |
I'm surprised he didn't mention the one thing that is, as far as I know (and according to Trivial Pursuit ), unique to the humming birds - the ability to fly backwards.
Never put off until tomorrow what you can put off until the day after
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
MangyTiger Member (Idle past 6381 days) Posts: 989 From: Leicester, UK Joined: |
Several insects, most notably the dragonfly that has been around since ? the creataceous ? can fly backwards. Sorry about that - I should have specified "unique amongst birds". Since the original hummingbird part of the discussion was comparing and contrasting hummingbirds to other birds I took the 'bird context' as a given - but as the thread progresses that nuance gets lost in the overall discussion so it was a mistake on my part to omit it. Never put off until tomorrow what you can put off until the day after
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
MangyTiger Member (Idle past 6381 days) Posts: 989 From: Leicester, UK Joined: |
What is unique about hummingbird flight? As I said in Message 10 (and clarified in Message 14 ) hummingbirds are the only birds that can fly backwards. Oops! Wrong Planet
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
MangyTiger Member (Idle past 6381 days) Posts: 989 From: Leicester, UK Joined: |
Hi RAZD. Sorry I didn't reply sooner, I was serving my first suspension (yea! I've arrived at EvC )
I have also watched birds of prey hover over potential prey move backwards. Maybe it's different in the US but every bird of prey I've watched over here (and thinking about it on every nature documentary I've ever watched) hovers by riding a thermal, and any backwards movement is just adjusting position within the thermal. To compare this to the powered hovering and backward movement of a hummingbird seems kind of risible to me. Wait a minute - let's look at the sentence which follows:
I wouldn't call it "flying backwards"... Ok so given the topic is flying backwards you pretty much state yourself it's irrelevant to the discussion so we can just forget you brought it up.
I don't know enought about the honeycreepers in Hawaii (especially the extinct ones) to know what their abilities were (using a similar food source) or enough about tropical birds to say that none others have the ability to back up. Neither do I. I was merely repeating what is frequently stated on nature and science programs (and quiz shows and Trivial Pursuit cards etc.). Maybe it is just an urban myth - but I can find nothing on the web that says so.
Choosing a species that is "best" at some ability or other, and then claiming that "wow, it's better than all the others, so it must not be evolution" is post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy coupled with the argument from incredulity and ignorance and then leaping to a conclusion not supported by evidence. And you're addressing this paragraph to me why exactly? You asked 'what was unique about hummigbird flight?' and I replied 'they are unique amonst birds in their ability to fly backwards'. In what way does my observation that to the best of my knowledge hummingbirds are the only birds that can fly backwards have any connection with the paragraph above? Keep your condescending irrelevancies to yourself in future please.
Again, what is so unique about hummingbird flight? What is\are the feature(s) that would show up in fossils? Well according to the Smithsonian Institute it's the elbow and wrist bones:
Unlike those of other birds, hummingbirds' elbows and wrist bones are fused and virtually immobile. The article also contains some a mention of the difference between the hummingbird wing motion and that of other birds (and helicopters!):
The pattern of the wing-beat is more of a figure-eight than a circle like a helicopter or an up and down motion like other birds. With this motion, hummingbirds can use their unusual wings to hover, fly forward, fly backwards, and even fly upside down. Go on, admit it - they're unique - Trivial Pursuit is never wrong Oops! Wrong Planet
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
MangyTiger Member (Idle past 6381 days) Posts: 989 From: Leicester, UK Joined: |
If I make a comment about Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice I think we'll end up with a moderator telling us it's off topic so I have created a Coffee House Thread where I have challenged your description of it as a porn movie.
I hope you'll respond over there. Oops! Wrong Planet
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
MangyTiger Member (Idle past 6381 days) Posts: 989 From: Leicester, UK Joined: |
What if he deliberately designed the paint to flake off? Or the windshield to cloud over as time passed? We used to call that "Built-in obsolescence" (whatever happened to that phrase? you never hear it any more[1]) - so his boss in Detroit might well regard him as a good designer On a serious note, I have said on numerous times that we cannot say whether a design is good or bad or not without knowing the requirements it is trying to satisfy. [1]The answer of course is that goods and credit are so cheap now we just buy a new one - without the pain level we used to have... Oops! Wrong Planet
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
MangyTiger Member (Idle past 6381 days) Posts: 989 From: Leicester, UK Joined: |
I know that Ford, Chysler, et al. are trying to screw us out of every cent they can, but how can you apply that to "The Designer"? I mean, what would he/she/it have to gain by us wearing out "prematurely"? Maybe we (or the Earth generally) is an experiment to see how long it takes to evolve a species that can fix the design flaws, or what novel methods we come up with (surgery, drugs, genetic engineering, who know what else). Or maybe he/she/it is just a major league sadist who is enjoying watching life on earth suffer.
My other excuse for taking the customer's viewpoint is that it's the only viewpoint we have. If we don't know the designer's intentions, we have only our own expectations to go by. I kind of agree but it does mean - to me at least - that all our discussions about good vs. bad design are reduced to nothing more than speculations. Mind you, were they ever anything more than that anyway?
(By the way, wouldn't mange be an example of bad design?) Maybe, maybe not. Perhaps Earth is a biological warfare experiment by an alien race who are attempting to produce a weapon against their intergalactic enemy - a species with luxuriant fur resembling dog hair. In this case the mites responsible for mange would be an example of good design Like I say, without knowing the desired outcome we have no valid criteria for judging whether a design is good or bad. Oops! Wrong Planet
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
MangyTiger Member (Idle past 6381 days) Posts: 989 From: Leicester, UK Joined: |
quote:I didn't know that Alan Alda did porn. I actually started a thread where BobAliceEve could argue this point but they never showed up (personally I think the four Oscar nominations scared them off ). By the way - Alan Alda isn't in it according to IMDB Oops! Wrong Planet
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024