Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,419 Year: 3,676/9,624 Month: 547/974 Week: 160/276 Day: 34/23 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationist theory
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 13 of 151 (319003)
06-08-2006 7:56 AM


Just out of interest would either Randman or Herepton care to state whether they agree with Syamsu's definition of Creationism?
TTFN,
WK

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 06-09-2006 3:18 PM Wounded King has replied

Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 15 of 151 (319604)
06-09-2006 5:05 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by Cold Foreign Object
06-09-2006 3:18 PM


I'll reply back in JAD's thread.
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 06-09-2006 3:18 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 78 of 151 (329537)
07-07-2006 6:27 AM
Reply to: Message 77 by Syamsu
07-07-2006 6:07 AM


In terms of decoherence I think it might be more accurate to locate the 'decision' as being owned by all the interacting elements of the system as a whole rather than simply the element most recently added to it. It isn't as if a human observer makes a conscious decision which path will be followed.
TTFN,
WK
Edited by Wounded King, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by Syamsu, posted 07-07-2006 6:07 AM Syamsu has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by Sandor Szabados, posted 07-07-2006 10:43 AM Wounded King has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024