Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,458 Year: 3,715/9,624 Month: 586/974 Week: 199/276 Day: 39/34 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The boasts of atheists (Atheist self-deception)
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 304 (330005)
07-09-2006 12:44 AM


These boasts--I have run across a lot of them and can provide quotes if you like--just will not do.
However, it is necessary that we make a distinction. The reason the atheists boast is to show that they can be happy and can be moral without God. Very understandable.
But we have to realize what is being said here. Yes, one can be happy and one can be moral, but one will also go to one's long home.
It will be, in a hundred years, as if you never existed. You are of no more significance than a roach crawling across the floor.
So one must understand that fact thoroughly before one speaks of "happiness" and "exemplary moral character" and the "wonder of life."
Except in a practical sense, it will not do to speak of such things as happiness and morality. If one is an atheist one should never speak this way. One should say, "We are products of a mindless universe, accidentally produced. We will live out our lives, and have some pleasures, and grow old, and die."

"Your friends, if they can, may bury you with some distinction, and set up a monument, to let posterity see that your dust lies under such a stone; and when that is done, all is done. Your place is filled up by another, the world is just in the same state it was, you are blotted out of its sight, and as much forgotten by the world as if you had never belonged to it."--William Law

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by sidelined, posted 07-09-2006 3:15 AM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 5 by Michael, posted 07-09-2006 7:48 AM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 6 by kongstad, posted 07-09-2006 10:05 AM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 7 by purpledawn, posted 07-09-2006 10:14 AM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 8 by nwr, posted 07-09-2006 10:29 AM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 10 by jar, posted 07-09-2006 11:20 AM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 11 by Discreet Label, posted 07-09-2006 1:31 PM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 12 by Phat, posted 07-09-2006 2:05 PM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 43 by Larni, posted 07-10-2006 8:32 AM robinrohan has replied
 Message 64 by Phat, posted 07-10-2006 11:04 AM robinrohan has replied
 Message 92 by ohnhai, posted 07-10-2006 1:42 PM robinrohan has replied
 Message 173 by RickJB, posted 07-11-2006 1:54 AM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 203 by Dr Jack, posted 07-11-2006 11:22 AM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 13 of 304 (330106)
07-09-2006 3:00 PM


Get a load of this
The claim that morality cannot exist without belief in an archaic mythology is simply false. By my own existence as an atheist and a man of exemplary moral character, my existence (as well as the vast number of moral atheists out there) I disprove the first premise. Thus, the entire argument is invalid.
Doesn't it make you want to puke?
Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by Discreet Label, posted 07-09-2006 3:17 PM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 15 by Phat, posted 07-09-2006 3:18 PM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 16 by jar, posted 07-09-2006 3:21 PM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 17 by purpledawn, posted 07-09-2006 4:02 PM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 107 by mikehager, posted 07-10-2006 2:50 PM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 30 of 304 (330192)
07-10-2006 12:02 AM
Reply to: Message 29 by jar
07-09-2006 11:48 PM


Re: another way of pondering the question
It sounds like he is saying quite the opposite of what you claim he is saying.
No. There is a difference between one's practical life and one's philosophical life. I would never speak of my nihilistic views to my peers. I could be fired for that. One must be very positive on one's job, of course.
But here I feel I can be honest.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by jar, posted 07-09-2006 11:48 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by lfen, posted 07-10-2006 2:03 AM robinrohan has replied
 Message 44 by iano, posted 07-10-2006 8:41 AM robinrohan has replied
 Message 62 by jar, posted 07-10-2006 10:54 AM robinrohan has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 32 of 304 (330202)
07-10-2006 12:18 AM


And then there's this sort of thing
I love life with robust enthusiasm, be it in appreciation for the sunshine after a week of cloudy skies, or in the intellectual pleasure of vigorous disagreement here at EvC.
It is all part of the wonder of living, Ian.
I mean, really. This is supposed to show how wonderful this person is and how this person doesn't need religion.
This will not do. One does not make statements like that if one is just a little bit honest.

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by ReverendDG, posted 07-10-2006 2:24 AM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 41 by purpledawn, posted 07-10-2006 6:03 AM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 33 of 304 (330206)
07-10-2006 12:25 AM
Reply to: Message 31 by Faith
07-10-2006 12:12 AM


Re: another way of pondering the question
What this further means (I guess. Robin can correct me) is that honesty requires a more sober assessment of happiness and morality in the absence of a God /absence of absolute standards than Robin thinks is expressed in what he calls "boasting" tones.
Well, yes, though admittedly I object to boasting in and of itself. I WOULD THINK ANYONE WOULD!
I was raised not to boast. Has that gone out of style?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Faith, posted 07-10-2006 12:12 AM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by lfen, posted 07-10-2006 1:42 AM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 34 of 304 (330215)
07-10-2006 12:41 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by Brian
07-09-2006 6:51 AM


Re: What world do you live in?
Why should we say these things, just because you say so?
Why waste away the years depressing yourself about your brief existence, why waste your life away kissing the ass of an imaginary Supreme Being?
There is nothing wrong with an atheist being happy and moral, we just don't worry about getting the reward at the end of time. So we grow old and die, shit happens, but at least we have lived.
Brian.
How about being honest for a change? How about that?

"Your friends, if they can, may bury you with some distinction, and set up a monument, to let posterity see that your dust lies under such a stone; and when that is done, all is done. Your place is filled up by another, the world is just in the same state it was, you are blotted out of its sight, and as much forgotten by the world as if you had never belonged to it."--William Law

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Brian, posted 07-09-2006 6:51 AM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by lfen, posted 07-10-2006 1:54 AM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 38 by PaulK, posted 07-10-2006 2:11 AM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 40 by Brian, posted 07-10-2006 3:16 AM robinrohan has replied
 Message 126 by ramoss, posted 07-10-2006 3:41 PM robinrohan has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 42 of 304 (330267)
07-10-2006 8:28 AM
Reply to: Message 40 by Brian
07-10-2006 3:16 AM


Re: What world do you live in?
We have this nonsense:
I mean, we do good deeds because we love our fellow humans and we feel for them, we understand and sympathise a lot of the time with their plights.
And then there's this bravado:
why waste your life away kissing the ass of an imaginary Supreme Being?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by Brian, posted 07-10-2006 3:16 AM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by Brian, posted 07-10-2006 9:55 AM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 45 of 304 (330276)
07-10-2006 8:47 AM
Reply to: Message 44 by iano
07-10-2006 8:41 AM


Re: another way of pondering the question
You mean act as if the self-defined purpose is actually and objective one. "I really believe that what I do makes a difference and that this is one of the core meanings of life I teach here". For if you didn't then you would, in effect, be saying that their jobs (and hence lives) are purposeless in which case you could expect to be separated sheep and goat fashion. Defeatist talk is not welcome
Exactly.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by iano, posted 07-10-2006 8:41 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by iano, posted 07-10-2006 8:56 AM robinrohan has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 47 of 304 (330278)
07-10-2006 8:57 AM
Reply to: Message 43 by Larni
07-10-2006 8:32 AM


When I say "I'm happy" I am not boasting but either telling the truth of lieing.
Do you mean that you find it hard to believe that any one sans a god could honestly feel happy
It's not about being unhappy or unhappy. Happiness is no problem. If I want to be happy, I can just buy myself some beer, and I'm perfectly happy.
But one ought to have a realistic philosophical position. I have been noticing for some time what we can call the creeping sentimentality of my culture. Thinking about it, I've come to the conclusion that the cause of this malady is the dictates of the business world--the world of work. Now in business, one must be pleasant. One must smile. One must pretend to like one's customer.
Another characteristic of the world of work is the constant congratulations, the giving out of awards and such. One is reminded of Hollywood, where they give out an award daily it appears.
This is all a practical necessity, and I have no quarrel with it as long as one realizes what one is doing. It is a necessary pretence.
But we must not let our pretensions get confused with an honest view of life.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Larni, posted 07-10-2006 8:32 AM Larni has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by CK, posted 07-10-2006 8:59 AM robinrohan has replied
 Message 52 by iano, posted 07-10-2006 9:03 AM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 49 of 304 (330281)
07-10-2006 9:00 AM
Reply to: Message 46 by iano
07-10-2006 8:56 AM


Re: another way of pondering the question
"Lets face it guys, what we produce here is rubbish. Mutton dressed as lamb. If we and those like us closed down tomorrow the world would a better place. Your not trying to tell me that processed food is anything but crap are you. C'mon - lets get real here! The world wants it, they fall for the convenience and packaging - but you and I know its all a con - but I agree, you machine will help us produce this crap cheaper and more efficiently"
Excellent!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by iano, posted 07-10-2006 8:56 AM iano has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 50 of 304 (330282)
07-10-2006 9:02 AM
Reply to: Message 48 by CK
07-10-2006 8:59 AM


Why? What would it do for me?
Uphold your honor.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by CK, posted 07-10-2006 8:59 AM CK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by CK, posted 07-10-2006 9:03 AM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 54 by PaulK, posted 07-10-2006 9:25 AM robinrohan has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 55 of 304 (330290)
07-10-2006 9:38 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by PaulK
07-10-2006 9:25 AM


If CK claimed to be "honorable" why would that be anything more than one of those allegedly self-deceiving boasts you are complaining about ?
Of course one would not boast about such a thing as personal integrity or "honor." For one thing, it's rather hard to maintain.
Admittedly, this idea about honor is just my own subjective system.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by PaulK, posted 07-10-2006 9:25 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by PaulK, posted 07-10-2006 9:48 AM robinrohan has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 57 of 304 (330296)
07-10-2006 9:54 AM
Reply to: Message 56 by PaulK
07-10-2006 9:48 AM


Which would reduce this thread to the "dishonest" "boasting" and "pretence" which you are congratulating yourself on avoiding.
I'm sure I don't avoid it; in fact I know I don't. But one can have good principles without having good practice.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by PaulK, posted 07-10-2006 9:48 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by PaulK, posted 07-10-2006 10:09 AM robinrohan has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 60 of 304 (330305)
07-10-2006 10:17 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by PaulK
07-10-2006 10:09 AM


So really all I see is that you are using your "principles" to attack others, and in doing so committing the same offence you accuse others of.
I don't think so. "Boasting" means making self-praising comments (whether true or not) about ONESELF, not about an idea.
If you argue that your IDEA is right, this is not boasting, the way I am defining it. Of course one argues that one's idea is right.
But that's not the same sort of comment as saying, "I have exemplary moral character."
Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by PaulK, posted 07-10-2006 10:09 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by PaulK, posted 07-10-2006 10:29 AM robinrohan has replied
 Message 72 by Larni, posted 07-10-2006 12:02 PM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 83 of 304 (330385)
07-10-2006 1:24 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by PaulK
07-10-2006 10:29 AM


It is certainly not to argue that your ideas are right - if it were you would actually be presenting arguments instead of attacking peopel for disagreeing.
Well, the boasting irritated me.
However, I think I would sum up my argument as follows: There is a tendency among non-believers, in their eagerness to prove to believers that one can be very happy, fulfilled, and of high moral character without any religious belief, to exaggerate their qualities and the qualities of their experiences--thus the boasting. This exaggerated view of oneself and of life in general might be advantageous in a practical sense--say in the business world--but it's no good philosophically. One has a skewed vision of oneself and of life.
Ned in another thread spoke approvingly of a "healthy ego," but I do not find a sentimental view of oneself and of life to be healthy. I think it very unhealthy. Now it is true that from the standpoint of nihilism it doesn't in the long matter what one's view of life is. But I'm not speaking of the long run. Also, it is true that there is in a sense a sort of subtle boasting in many statements we make. If I make an argument, I am insinuating that I am right. But that sort of "boast" can't be helped, if one is going to say anything at all. When I speak of "boasting," I mean overt, blatant, self-praise.

"Your friends, if they can, may bury you with some distinction, and set up a monument, to let posterity see that your dust lies under such a stone; and when that is done, all is done. Your place is filled up by another, the world is just in the same state it was, you are blotted out of its sight, and as much forgotten by the world as if you had never belonged to it."--William Law

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by PaulK, posted 07-10-2006 10:29 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by PaulK, posted 07-10-2006 1:44 PM robinrohan has replied
 Message 96 by docpotato, posted 07-10-2006 1:47 PM robinrohan has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024