Why is the process blind ?

The Bible-thumping Fundies and the chance-happy Darwimps are both full of it right up to their eyeballs. The truth lies elsewhere in the Prescribed Evolutionary Hypothesis!It is hard to believe isn't it?I love it so!

---

"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."

John if you want to discuss the PEH please start a new thread. If you continue to claim that you won't discuss it here anymore then don't bring it into other's threads.

---

AdminAsgara Queen of the Universe

http://perditionsgate.bravepages.com

I will do as I please until you do the inevitable, as you have in the past, which is to ban me from further participation. I do not take orders well, especially from anonymous sources with such patently absurd aliases as "Queen of the Universe." Besides the PEH is very appropriate to both threads as any fool can see.Now do what you have to do. I always have.It is hard to believe isn't it?

---

"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."

Davison:DaveScot told me that I can cite him for the following fact:You were not banned at UD for your views or disagreements; but for vulgarities.This is your m.o.: when the going gets rough retreat into invective - the sanctuary of the defeated.I have repeatedly asked you WHO or WHAT perscribes your theory ? As it sits now, like the Darwinists, YOU are the perscriber speaking for the oracle (nature). We know these concepts come straight out of ancient Greece. Since Zeus and his daughter (Dike/deekay) couldn't speak powerful people spoke for them (Greek philosophers). Einstein's guru (Spinoza) thought nature itself had a mind. Both Spinoza and Einstein humbly spoke for the mind that produced bat sonar but could not speak itself LOL!Darwin personified nature and spoke for it.Davison personifies nature and speaks for it.From ancient Greece until the present we see an invisible conspirator (Satan) at work. Physicists believe in invisible things (atomic particles) and deduce their existence and behavior by the effects of their presence. We deduce the effects of Satan's presence the same way. The Darwinists own the microphone and deliberately misrepresent the opposition as Fundies.We know that which a person or groups of persons overtly condemn = that which they are covertly guilty of the most.Darwinists are the Fundies of Science. They automatically ignore and smear all evidence that falsifies their dogma and dismiss the Bible a priori = the concomitant opposites of their religious brothers.You Davison are a spoiled child craving attention just as much as Dawkins or Pinker or Hawking = modern day prophets who pretend to speak for physical reality and steal the patent from God. You use the Fundy label like a true Darwinist. The inescapable facts of psychology have identified the truth.Ray Martinez

Your disapproval of Admin Asgara proves how right she is. The approval of a coward like you would have supported her wrongness.Ray Martinez

Prof. Davison is one of your own and thus - your problem. We Creationists have enough of our own problems with various wackos. Please be responsible and remove Davison from our threads. We shouldn't have to do your babysitting for you.Ray Martinez

I will ask John not to post in your thread.

The originator of this thread Herepton has asked you to not post in this thread. Please grant him the same courtesy we granted you. See Message 51.

---

But we know he will not comply based on what he already said to Admin Asgara. Why don't you just re-open his own thread and let him talk to himself seeing how thats all he does anyway ?You Darwinists need to handle your own dirty laundry by yourselves. We don't believe in any evolution the way you guys define it which makes Davison one of you and your problem.Ray

Edited by AdminJar, : At the request of the thread originator the contents have been hidden

---

"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."

Edited by AdminJar, : The originator of the thread has asked John not to post.

---

"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."

Edited by AdminJar, : John has been told not to post in this thread.

---

"A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable."