Same goes for the old SETI argument. Humanity is one known example in the universe of a civilization with communications technology based around electromagnetism. There *might* be others, although the chances of finding them are very slim. Only a tiny fraction of available research budgets go anywhere near this field.
This is a better example than what I gave, thank you.
There is absolutely no evidence of aliens, only subjective, yet we search for them. According to calculations and odds, we shouldn't even exist in this universe. So, doesn't that make it bad science to waste time looking for aliens?
No one, on the other hand, has ever observed God or intelligent design. Nor does any of the evidence gathered point to it.
I disagree, if you ever experienced what I have experienced from God, you would think differently. It may be subjective, but everything we view in life is through our subjective minds.
The whole story of Noah and the ark comes from a subjective Holy Book. How can you even fathom the ark without contemplating God?
How does the possibility of an ark being built even qualify as Creation science?