Transitional fossils not proof of evolution?

"Transitional fossils not proof of evolution?"are there even transitional fossils that's been found?

"Millions of them. Likely billions of them."show me proof that they've found transitional fossils.

"Before one can properly answer this question you will have to tell us how you define a "transitional". What to you think one should look like."that means everyone has their own version of what the definition of "transitional" is since you asked me how i define transitional(it's like me asking you how do you define good food or good music?).for me a "transitional fossil" is a fossil that's part say fish and part frog.

"All fossils are transitional."explain.

"No, there is a clear definition as used in biology. However, we find people come on here without knowing what one is and seem to have their own idiosyncratic definition."are you a scientist?

"Do you want to wait for a practicing scientist to discuss this? Or are you willing to talk to some of us who have done a bit more reading in the area than you may have?"so you're not a scientist.

"If we approach this more generally and ask about transitionals between fish and amphibians, a number of transitionals appear in the fossil record. The most famous is the Coelacanth, of which there is actually a modern representative."coelacanths are still around and they have not "evolved".200 coelacanths were caught many times in different parts of the world.