Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,484 Year: 3,741/9,624 Month: 612/974 Week: 225/276 Day: 1/64 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Page v. Borger
derwood
Member (Idle past 1898 days)
Posts: 1457
Joined: 12-27-2001


Message 91 of 92 (33540)
03-03-2003 10:26 AM


quote:
I sit at a computer all day unless I must attend meetings. We all need breaks from the monotony of work and I use this forum to make the time go by faster
I'm thinking of refinancing. But I know of one such institution that I will not be looking into.
[This message has been edited by SLPx, 03-03-2003]

  
Peter
Member (Idle past 1501 days)
Posts: 2161
From: Cambridgeshire, UK.
Joined: 02-05-2002


Message 92 of 92 (33558)
03-03-2003 3:22 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by Black
01-28-2003 8:02 AM


Your missing the point about the meaning of 'random'
in the context of this discussion.
Peter Borger considers that the mutations are non-random
because there are areas of the DNA that have a statistically
higher probability of suffering copying errors than others.
He attributes to the term non-random the meaning of deterministic.
Random in the context of evolutionary biology means that we
cannot predict in advance when a mutation will occur, nor
what effect that mutation will have on the organism (if any).
That there is a mechanism that mitigates copy errors is good for
ToE in that it undermines all of the 'mutations are bad' line
of argument (if it needed any undermining!)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Black, posted 01-28-2003 8:02 AM Black has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024