Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,859 Year: 4,116/9,624 Month: 987/974 Week: 314/286 Day: 35/40 Hour: 1/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What makes a terrorist a terrorist?
melatonin
Member (Idle past 6237 days)
Posts: 126
From: Cymru
Joined: 02-13-2006


Message 136 of 300 (335833)
07-27-2006 6:39 PM
Reply to: Message 135 by Faith
07-27-2006 6:15 PM


Re: Not all THAT complicated to define it
I'm sure it does ring true to your ears. Have you found that info that justifies to your ears the bombing four unarmed UN observers yet?
Not exactly the most unbiased source. I think you should read the book by the Israeli historian Uri Millstein. Members of Lehi who were there talk about numbers, not whether it happened.
The story of the massacre at Deir Yassin is part of the Arab tradition and the Hebrew tradition. And in fact, nobody denies: most of the dead in Deir Yassin were old men, women and children, and only a few of them were young men who could be classified as warriors, even though in the Etzel-Lehi meeting before the battle the suggestion (which was raised) of killing civilians had not been accepted, and even though the attackers called upon the villagers to leave the village at the beginning of the attack. On the other hand, there are differences of opinion regarding the number of dead. {A.I. - largely irrelevant}
http://www.ariga.com/peacewatch/dy/umilst.htm
More Israeli eyewitness testimony...
http://www.ariga.com/peacewatch/dy/levitza.htm
http://www.ariga.com/peacewatch/dy/dypail.htm
I guess you also believe that the IDF was completely innocent in the slaughter of between 750-3000 palestinian refugees at Shabra and Shatila in Lebanon (1982; when they stood by and allowed the maronites to slaughter them).
Edited by melatonin, : add info & Links

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by Faith, posted 07-27-2006 6:15 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 138 by Faith, posted 07-27-2006 6:49 PM melatonin has replied
 Message 140 by Wepwawet, posted 07-27-2006 7:38 PM melatonin has replied

berberry
Inactive Member


Message 137 of 300 (335835)
07-27-2006 6:40 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by Faith
07-27-2006 1:34 PM


Re: Not all THAT complicated to define it
Faith writes:
quote:
But what I do know is how they are being set up now to look like they are in the wrong when they are not, and the world, especially the Left, eats it up.
Are you talking about the Howard Dean left or the Pat Buchanan left?
Edited by berberry, : Forgot to include the quote from Faith.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by Faith, posted 07-27-2006 1:34 PM Faith has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 138 of 300 (335838)
07-27-2006 6:49 PM
Reply to: Message 136 by melatonin
07-27-2006 6:39 PM


Re: Not all THAT complicated to define it
I didn't say it was right, the Jewish soldiers lost their head and fired indiscriminately, but it wasn't the cold-blooded massacre depicted, but they were provoked to a fury by the typical Arab cowardice, dressing like women, and their duplicity, pretending to surrender only to fire on the Jews.
Yes I already posted the explanation for their firing on the UN post. Typical Arab duplicity, using the UN post for a shield. I'll post the link in a minute.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by melatonin, posted 07-27-2006 6:39 PM melatonin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 139 by melatonin, posted 07-27-2006 7:19 PM Faith has replied
 Message 148 by macaroniandcheese, posted 07-27-2006 10:16 PM Faith has replied
 Message 154 by ikabod, posted 07-28-2006 3:54 AM Faith has not replied
 Message 156 by MangyTiger, posted 07-28-2006 5:54 AM Faith has replied

melatonin
Member (Idle past 6237 days)
Posts: 126
From: Cymru
Joined: 02-13-2006


Message 139 of 300 (335845)
07-27-2006 7:19 PM
Reply to: Message 138 by Faith
07-27-2006 6:49 PM


Re: Not all THAT complicated to define it
So what you are saying is that because there were reports of a couple of arabs dressed as women, the massacre was justifiable?
Meir Pail, who visited the village recounts, "it was noon when the battle had ended and the shooting stopped. The atmosphere became calmer. But the village did not surrender... The Lechi and Irgun fighters... started clearing the houses. They shot with every weapon they had and threw explosives into the houses. They shot at whoever they saw in the houses, including women and children. And the commanders didn’t even try to stop this shameful carnage."
Pa’il says that after the parade of captives in streets of the city, some of the men were taken to the quarry and shot. On the 12th of April a medical committee of the Physicians Association visited the village. The members of the committee, Dr. Avigdori and Dr. Druyan testify that mainly bodies of women and children were found in the rooms of houses, riddled with bullets.60 They were not killed by blowing up the houses, and no adult male bodies were found in the rooms.
Where is the anti-Israeli propoganda? It is called a massacre by the jewish people who were there. What you read above are war crimes committed by Zionist militias.
Edited by melatonin, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by Faith, posted 07-27-2006 6:49 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 143 by Faith, posted 07-27-2006 8:47 PM melatonin has replied

Wepwawet
Member (Idle past 6136 days)
Posts: 85
From: Texas
Joined: 04-05-2006


Message 140 of 300 (335853)
07-27-2006 7:38 PM
Reply to: Message 136 by melatonin
07-27-2006 6:39 PM


Observation Post Attack
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,205978,00.html?sPage=...
Headline: E-Mail Casts Doubt on Claims of Israel Targeting U.N. Peacekeepers
quote:
The email from Major Paeta Hess-von Kruedener warned that the post had come under "unintentional" artillery fire and aerial bombing several times in the previous weeks, and that several Hezbollah positions were in the area of the patrol base.
"It is not safe or prudent for us to conduct normal patrol activities," wrote Kruedener in the July 18th e-mail. "(The artillery and aerial bombing) has not been deliberate targeting, but has rather been due to tactical necessity."
Kruedener was one of four unarmed U.N. military observers killed in Tuesday's bombing.
From what I understand Hezbollah was all over that area using the presence of the UN observer base as protection from Israeli strikes. The presence of UN observers in no way implies a safe zone where combatants can run to rest and rearm during combat. Hezbollah deliberately endangered the post by operating in the area. This is war, not hide and seek.
Did you know that Hezbollah has attacked UN observers with small arms fire as well?
Attention Required! | Cloudflare
Do you suppose they have justification?
Edited by Wepwawet, : No reason given.

When science and the Bible differ, science has obviously misinterpreted its data.
- Henry Morris, Head of Institute for Creation Research

This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by melatonin, posted 07-27-2006 6:39 PM melatonin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 141 by melatonin, posted 07-27-2006 8:07 PM Wepwawet has replied

melatonin
Member (Idle past 6237 days)
Posts: 126
From: Cymru
Joined: 02-13-2006


Message 141 of 300 (335862)
07-27-2006 8:07 PM
Reply to: Message 140 by Wepwawet
07-27-2006 7:38 PM


Re: Observation Post Attack
Of course not, anyone attacking the observers should be condemned.
But they stuck a laser-guided bomb right on the observation post, if it was indirect, the bunker in which they hid would be relatively unharmed. It survived direct artillary fire.
What do they have armies for? If they wanted to remove the hezbollah fighters, they should have sent in their men with tanks, instead of sacrificing the UN observers. What you are implicitly saying is that the lives of IDF soldiers were worth more than the unarmed UN observers.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 140 by Wepwawet, posted 07-27-2006 7:38 PM Wepwawet has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 142 by Wepwawet, posted 07-27-2006 8:43 PM melatonin has replied

Wepwawet
Member (Idle past 6136 days)
Posts: 85
From: Texas
Joined: 04-05-2006


Message 142 of 300 (335867)
07-27-2006 8:43 PM
Reply to: Message 141 by melatonin
07-27-2006 8:07 PM


Re: Observation Post Attack
But they stuck a laser-guided bomb right on the observation post, if it was indirect, the bunker in which they hid would be relatively unharmed. It survived direct artillary fire.
What's your source for this attack being made with precision weapons? Last I heard they were unsure if it was an airstrike, artillery or both. I call BS on your contention that they would be safe in a bunker from direct artillery strikes. You don't understand the power of modern artillery and I rather doubt the post was hardened sufficiently to protect the men from a direct strike.
What do they have armies for? If they wanted to remove the hezbollah fighters, they should have sent in their men with tanks, instead of sacrificing the UN observers. What you are implicitly saying is that the lives of IDF soldiers were worth more than the unarmed UN observers.
And you are implying that the lives of the UN observers are worth more than those of the Israelis. I'm sorry, this is a war zone; anyone there assumes a level of risk. Unless you have some sort of proof that this strike deliberately targetted the post with the intention of killing the observers(aside from Kofi Annan's asinine comments), you might want to give the promised investigation a chance to reach a conclusion instead of swallowing the media accounts from reporters that weren't there.

When science and the Bible differ, science has obviously misinterpreted its data.
- Henry Morris, Head of Institute for Creation Research

This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by melatonin, posted 07-27-2006 8:07 PM melatonin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 144 by melatonin, posted 07-27-2006 8:55 PM Wepwawet has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 143 of 300 (335868)
07-27-2006 8:47 PM
Reply to: Message 139 by melatonin
07-27-2006 7:19 PM


Re: Not all THAT complicated to define it
No I didn't say it was justified. I just said that there were factors you are not taking into account in your zeal to make the Israelis out to be unmitigated evil and the Muslims nothing but victims. If the men set up the women and children for slaughter that is a different picture than the one you are painting. This is what they do when they locate terrorist headquarters and arsenals in civilian neighborhoods and when they swarm a UN post knowing this will draw fire on it.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 139 by melatonin, posted 07-27-2006 7:19 PM melatonin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 145 by melatonin, posted 07-27-2006 9:01 PM Faith has replied

melatonin
Member (Idle past 6237 days)
Posts: 126
From: Cymru
Joined: 02-13-2006


Message 144 of 300 (335869)
07-27-2006 8:55 PM
Reply to: Message 142 by Wepwawet
07-27-2006 8:43 PM


Re: Observation Post Attack
yes, I do believe the lives of the UN observers are worth more than the IDF soldiers. These were innocent bystanders. If the IDF wants to fight, let them fight but not by sacrificing innocent UN observers who are doing a job under United Nations instructions. Australian UN observers have no been withdrawn, the rest to follow - which was probably the aim.
How UN Lebanon post was bombed
There was fierce fighting in the Khiam area for six hours
Details of the circumstances in which the Israeli air force bombed a United Nations observation post in south Lebanon, killing four UN peacekeepers have begun to emerge.
According to diplomats familiar with the UN's initial report into the incident, the post in the town of Khiam was hit by precision-guided munition, says the BBC's Paul Adams in Jerusalem.
The report says there was fierce fighting in the area for about six hours before the post was hit, during which time UN personnel contacted the Israel military 10 times, urging them to stop firing.
Our correspondent says the UN claims that after each call, it was assured the firing would stop.
Six warning calls
A preliminary UN report said 17 bombardments landed within one kilometre of the post, and 12 artillery rounds hit within 150 metres of the structure - four of them being direct hits.
After this, the post was hit by a precision-guided weapon from an Israeli aircraft.
The Irish foreign ministry said one of its officers in the UN's Unifil peacekeeping force in south Lebanon, placed six warning calls to the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) prior to the attack.
"On six separate occasions he was in contact with the Israelis to warn them that their bombardment was endangering the lives of UN staff in South Lebanon," Reuters news agency quoted an unnamed foreign office spokesman as saying.
"He warned: 'You have to address this problem or lives may be lost'," the spokesman said.
The Associated Press news agency named the officer as Lt Col John Molloy.
The bomb which killed the unarmed peacekeepers - Canadian, Austrian, Finnish and Chinese soldiers - hit the building and shelter of the observation post, near the eastern end of the Lebanese-Israeli border, UN spokesman Milos Struger said.
Israel has launched an investigation.
The UN post was on high ground, in an area once occupied by Israel.
BBC NEWS | Middle East | How UN Lebanon post was bombed
The post survived four direct hits from the Paladin 155mm howitzers, then was subsequently destroyed by a direct hit by a precision-guided weapon. The didn't hide in wooden huts.
Edited by melatonin, : linky added

This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by Wepwawet, posted 07-27-2006 8:43 PM Wepwawet has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 146 by jar, posted 07-27-2006 9:01 PM melatonin has replied

melatonin
Member (Idle past 6237 days)
Posts: 126
From: Cymru
Joined: 02-13-2006


Message 145 of 300 (335870)
07-27-2006 9:01 PM
Reply to: Message 143 by Faith
07-27-2006 8:47 PM


Re: Not all THAT complicated to define it
Israeli's aren't evil, nor are palestinians. Both are victims.
Radical Islam and Zionism are/were using religion for evil deeds.
edit: just had to add - I said that Deir Yassin was a war crime, it was a slaughter of around 100 civilians - people who were there agree. I have not misrepresented this at all.
Edited by melatonin, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by Faith, posted 07-27-2006 8:47 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 150 by Faith, posted 07-28-2006 12:06 AM melatonin has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 146 of 300 (335871)
07-27-2006 9:01 PM
Reply to: Message 144 by melatonin
07-27-2006 8:55 PM


Re: Observation Post Attack
You might even ask where bunker busting bombs came from.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 144 by melatonin, posted 07-27-2006 8:55 PM melatonin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 147 by melatonin, posted 07-27-2006 9:22 PM jar has not replied

melatonin
Member (Idle past 6237 days)
Posts: 126
From: Cymru
Joined: 02-13-2006


Message 147 of 300 (335873)
07-27-2006 9:22 PM
Reply to: Message 146 by jar
07-27-2006 9:01 PM


Re: Observation Post Attack
Yup, this situation stinks.
For the kidnapping of two Israeli soldiers, we now have over 400 civilian deaths in Lebanon, around 40 in Israel. Apparently, this action has been planned for a while.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by jar, posted 07-27-2006 9:01 PM jar has not replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3955 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 148 of 300 (335877)
07-27-2006 10:16 PM
Reply to: Message 138 by Faith
07-27-2006 6:49 PM


Re: Not all THAT complicated to define it
"provoked to fury" is not an acceptable international legal defense.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by Faith, posted 07-27-2006 6:49 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 149 by Faith, posted 07-27-2006 11:56 PM macaroniandcheese has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 149 of 300 (335885)
07-27-2006 11:56 PM
Reply to: Message 148 by macaroniandcheese
07-27-2006 10:16 PM


Re: Not all THAT complicated to define it
I didn't say it was, if you bothered to read. I'm only saying it's not the picture that everybody else is creating. They were provoked. Yes they should have kept their cool anyway, but the other side's actions are pretty sleazy, and it is low tactics like that now, putting their own people in danger, that are creating the illusion that Israel is in the wrong when they aren't.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 148 by macaroniandcheese, posted 07-27-2006 10:16 PM macaroniandcheese has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 150 of 300 (335886)
07-28-2006 12:06 AM
Reply to: Message 145 by melatonin
07-27-2006 9:01 PM


Re: Not all THAT complicated to define it
Israeli's aren't evil, nor are palestinians. Both are victims.
Ah the usual PC formula, just a statement of faith. But this isn't about people, Palestinians vs. Israelis, it's an ideology vs. national interest. I'm not saying Israel is always in the right, I'm just saying that the Palestinian cause is trumped up, and fueled by the ideology of Islam.
Radical Islam and Zionism are/were using religion for evil deeds.
That is simply not the case for Israel. They are acting to protect their people, period. It is ultimately Islam on the other side that is driving the attacks on the "infidel" Israelis. Zionism aims to establish the land for the Jews, it isn't in itself the reason for war. But Islam is the reason for war against the Jews. The intifada. Jihad.
edit: just had to add - I said that Deir Yassin was a war crime, it was a slaughter of around 100 civilians - people who were there agree. I have not misrepresented this at all.
The "men" who dressed as women deserve half the responsibility for that war crime.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 145 by melatonin, posted 07-27-2006 9:01 PM melatonin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 151 by melatonin, posted 07-28-2006 2:17 AM Faith has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024