Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,386 Year: 3,643/9,624 Month: 514/974 Week: 127/276 Day: 1/23 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Pseudogene Shared Mistakes
judge
Member (Idle past 6464 days)
Posts: 216
From: australia
Joined: 11-11-2002


Message 7 of 9 (338312)
08-06-2006 9:21 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by pink sasquatch
07-04-2006 7:01 PM


Re: no "jumping", but really need the primary article...
quote:
- They selectively examined exonic sequence that may be under some level of selection even in psuedogene form (which is perhaps why both guinea pig and human genes mutated to having four stop codons - to prevent unnecessary or aberrant transcripts).
Would this really explain why the mutation happened, or just why it might have been retained?
In this case would we still not be left with the big question of why the exact same mutations happened, on many occaisions.
quote:
The research hasn't been replicated. Maybe some of the "guinea pig" sequencing reactions were contaminated with human DNA.
I have not read the AIG article, but am familiar with the results of the paper. The problem here is that the guinea pig mutations do not exactly match the human mutations.
I think 11 out of 21 sites matched and most but not all of these sites were the same changes IIRC.
If the sequencing reactions were contamninated with human DNa would we no see an exact match.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by pink sasquatch, posted 07-04-2006 7:01 PM pink sasquatch has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024