Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Pseudogene Shared Mistakes
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1487 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 9 of 9 (338327)
08-07-2006 1:16 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by randman
08-06-2006 11:57 PM


Re: huh?
Um, isn't that a reasonable assumption if we assume orders denote genetic similarity?
It depends on your model of taxonomy. If you group based on inferred phylogenies, then yes, "order" refers to one or another degree of genetic similarity.
If you group based on morphology, though, then order doesn't necessarily mean that. It'll tend to, because phenotype stems from genotype, but it won't be guaranteed. Of course, morphology in all but a few cases is all we have to go on for fossils.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by randman, posted 08-06-2006 11:57 PM randman has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024