Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,415 Year: 3,672/9,624 Month: 543/974 Week: 156/276 Day: 30/23 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Showcase Forum Issues and Requests
Cold Foreign Object 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3069 days)
Posts: 3417
Joined: 11-21-2003


Message 166 of 302 (337265)
08-01-2006 5:08 PM


Disappearing message
http://EvC Forum: Racist Darwin ? -->EvC Forum: Racist Darwin ?
It posts then it disappears....WTF
Ray

Replies to this message:
 Message 167 by AdminAsgara, posted 08-01-2006 5:10 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

AdminAsgara
Administrator (Idle past 2323 days)
Posts: 2073
From: The Universe
Joined: 10-11-2003


Message 167 of 302 (337266)
08-01-2006 5:10 PM
Reply to: Message 166 by Cold Foreign Object
08-01-2006 5:08 PM


Re: Disappearing message
I see your message 21 and message 22 where you deleted content as a double post. Which message are you NOT seeing?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 166 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 08-01-2006 5:08 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 168 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 08-02-2006 3:59 PM AdminAsgara has not replied
 Message 169 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 08-08-2006 1:55 PM AdminAsgara has not replied

Cold Foreign Object 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3069 days)
Posts: 3417
Joined: 11-21-2003


Message 168 of 302 (337425)
08-02-2006 3:59 PM
Reply to: Message 167 by AdminAsgara
08-01-2006 5:10 PM


Re: Disappearing message
I see your message 21 and message 22 where you deleted content as a double post. Which message are you NOT seeing?
Hi Admin:
Here is what happened.
I post a message, it shows.
Then I noticed message did not post since the message I responded to was still listed as last message (instead of mine). I log off then come back and its still not there, but now you say its there and I agree = you got me....
Ray
Edited by Herepton, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 167 by AdminAsgara, posted 08-01-2006 5:10 PM AdminAsgara has not replied

Cold Foreign Object 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3069 days)
Posts: 3417
Joined: 11-21-2003


Message 169 of 302 (338535)
08-08-2006 1:55 PM
Reply to: Message 167 by AdminAsgara
08-01-2006 5:10 PM


Why not set up a Peanut Gallery thread for all Great Debates in progress, hopefully in a Forum that I can access ?
Ray

This message is a reply to:
 Message 167 by AdminAsgara, posted 08-01-2006 5:10 PM AdminAsgara has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 170 by CK, posted 08-09-2006 6:34 AM Cold Foreign Object has replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 170 of 302 (338673)
08-09-2006 6:34 AM
Reply to: Message 169 by Cold Foreign Object
08-08-2006 1:55 PM


I'm lurking at the moment but couldn't let this one pass.
What on earth is the point of a peanut gallery*, the top three threads in that forum are:
1) Racist Darwin - last post: 7 days ago
2) Creationist theory - last post: 21 days ago
3) [Sic]Transubspeciation - last post 24 days ago
Maybe you should concentrate on debating the people who join you there in such a way they don't just give up and leave you to it?
* Well of course the answer to that is obvious, it's an end run around your ban in the main forums, like your attempts to debate in the book nook.
Edited by CK, : fixed broken formating code

This message is a reply to:
 Message 169 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 08-08-2006 1:55 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 171 by Iname, posted 08-09-2006 5:59 PM CK has replied
 Message 174 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 08-10-2006 1:52 PM CK has replied

Iname
Junior Member (Idle past 3905 days)
Posts: 28
Joined: 06-08-2006


Message 171 of 302 (338768)
08-09-2006 5:59 PM
Reply to: Message 170 by CK
08-09-2006 6:34 AM


quote:
Why not set up a Peanut Gallery thread for all Great Debates in progress
He wasn't talking about the Showcase forum. Though he probably could've chosen a better place to post this.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 170 by CK, posted 08-09-2006 6:34 AM CK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 172 by CK, posted 08-10-2006 3:55 AM Iname has replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 172 of 302 (338870)
08-10-2006 3:55 AM
Reply to: Message 171 by Iname
08-09-2006 5:59 PM


doh! that's what I get for posting before coffee!
what's the phrase that the kids use those days
P'AWned!
(that's right,no?)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 171 by Iname, posted 08-09-2006 5:59 PM Iname has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 173 by Iname, posted 08-10-2006 12:04 PM CK has not replied

Iname
Junior Member (Idle past 3905 days)
Posts: 28
Joined: 06-08-2006


Message 173 of 302 (338948)
08-10-2006 12:04 PM
Reply to: Message 172 by CK
08-10-2006 3:55 AM


No, it's PWNed.
PWNed!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 172 by CK, posted 08-10-2006 3:55 AM CK has not replied

Cold Foreign Object 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3069 days)
Posts: 3417
Joined: 11-21-2003


Message 174 of 302 (338977)
08-10-2006 1:52 PM
Reply to: Message 170 by CK
08-09-2006 6:34 AM


All you do is take potshots at me from the distant security of a Forum where Darwinian Mods are ready to rescue you anytime logic, argument or facts have you pinned down.
I have been a good sport by accepting Showcase incarceration, the same has no sting since it is easily explained when one remembers that I am a Creationist and EvC is controlled by Darwinists.
I have been banned by Creationist boards, again, there is no sting when one remembers that the Creationists were Creationists of the Fundamentalist stripe.
Why don't you put your intellect where your mouth is and visit me sometime ? If you take the Richard Dawkins or Quetzal approach of refusing to debate with Creationists then, like Dawkins, you run the risk of objective persons viewing the boycott as really motivated by the inability to refute.
If you decline and really don't care then why all the potshots ?
Why don't you author a PNT for Showcase ?
Ray

This message is a reply to:
 Message 170 by CK, posted 08-09-2006 6:34 AM CK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 175 by kuresu, posted 08-10-2006 2:00 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied
 Message 176 by CK, posted 08-10-2006 2:22 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

kuresu
Member (Idle past 2534 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 175 of 302 (338979)
08-10-2006 2:00 PM
Reply to: Message 174 by Cold Foreign Object
08-10-2006 1:52 PM


explain AdminFaith and AdminBuzsaw, why don't ya.
why does everything ahve to conspiracy theories with you guys. If it wasn't for the fact that it was americans who put a man on the moon, you would probably claim it was some sort of vast atheistic, marxist conspiracy to trick yuo and your ilk that communism was supreme. sheez.
(assuming you are american)

All a man's knowledge comes from his experiences

This message is a reply to:
 Message 174 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 08-10-2006 1:52 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 176 of 302 (338982)
08-10-2006 2:22 PM
Reply to: Message 174 by Cold Foreign Object
08-10-2006 1:52 PM


I think the Showcase, however we dress it up, is just a rather cruel and shameful place for mentally ill people to be placed for the rest of the board to point and laugh. I've seen nothing so far to show me that's not the case. Some of the best posters on the board have been in there and it's pretty shameful stuff - it's like letting a university Prof. visit an asylum and then we all cheer when he out debates a man who's not mentally capable of producing a rational response. I'm increasingly baffled why such a state of affairs is allowed to go on - I suspect the low posting rate allows it to float under the radar of many people.
To be blunt I don't think you should be allow into the main boards for your own protection - it just would just feed into your psychosis.
Edited by CK, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 174 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 08-10-2006 1:52 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 179 by randman, posted 08-10-2006 4:11 PM CK has replied
 Message 181 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 08-11-2006 2:14 PM CK has not replied
 Message 182 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 08-11-2006 2:17 PM CK has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13016
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 1.9


Message 177 of 302 (338989)
08-10-2006 3:18 PM


The Purpose of Showcase
It probably helps if I explain the reasons for the Showcase forum every now and then. It's pretty simple. Showcase is for those who have proven immune to moderation, but who many wish to debate anyway.
It's probably also good idea to assess from time to time how well Showcase is working. After a fairly robust start it has pretty much petered out. The last post there was over a week ago. If would appear that much of the appeal of debating with showcased members was to tweak their nose through the bars, so to speak, because once it became clear that this wouldn't be permitted while the showcased members were given free rein, interest dissipated.
Another possibility for the lack of participation could that access by request only is too restrictive. Currently, no one has access unless specifically granted. We could try switching to a scheme where everyone has access unless specifically denied.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

Replies to this message:
 Message 178 by randman, posted 08-10-2006 4:07 PM Admin has not replied

randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4920 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 178 of 302 (339000)
08-10-2006 4:07 PM
Reply to: Message 177 by Admin
08-10-2006 3:18 PM


Re: The Purpose of Showcase
Well, I think part of it is the limited topics in Showcase. I proposes a Showcase topic, but it wasn't supported for here, or actually it was posted here and then removed.
The truth is there are topics I'd like to propose and debate here if I knew how. The one time I tried, it was removed from here. I don't view it as shameful to post here, and in fact think it could serve as a place to keep shameful and how can I say it, ignorant or less capable debaters, off the thread where they tend to foul up the potential for good discussion.
Edited by randman, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 177 by Admin, posted 08-10-2006 3:18 PM Admin has not replied

randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4920 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 179 of 302 (339003)
08-10-2006 4:11 PM
Reply to: Message 176 by CK
08-10-2006 2:22 PM


JAD faced almost no opposition
It's funny but the truth is JAD's comments were basically not oppossed by the evos. The silence was telling, as iano also noted. So your comments are rather bizarre.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 176 by CK, posted 08-10-2006 2:22 PM CK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 180 by CK, posted 08-10-2006 4:19 PM randman has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 180 of 302 (339006)
08-10-2006 4:19 PM
Reply to: Message 179 by randman
08-10-2006 4:11 PM


Re: JAD faced almost no opposition
Well if you say so - the thread is there so people can go check and decide for themselves.
Edited by CK, : added link.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 179 by randman, posted 08-10-2006 4:11 PM randman has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024