Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What price political correctness?
nator
Member (Idle past 2169 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 46 of 63 (339139)
08-11-2006 6:05 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by kuresu
08-10-2006 11:24 AM


quote:
unless you're on an overnight flight, that doesn't leave you much to do on the plane, and trust me, and eight hour flight is just a touch boring without some music
I rarely listen to music on a plane.
I read.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by kuresu, posted 08-10-2006 11:24 AM kuresu has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2169 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 47 of 63 (339140)
08-11-2006 6:13 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by Heathen
08-10-2006 1:34 PM


quote:
Besides, isn't it possible that this 'Foiled plot' is merely a nice little publicity stunt for Mr Blair? He's not been too poular lately.. this could be just what he needs, and just the excuse to push through national identity cards.
Mid-term elections are also coming very soon here in the states, and the Republicans are in some very close races.
I really can't ignore the incredibly fortuitous timing of this event.
Fear worked for Bush in the last election.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Heathen, posted 08-10-2006 1:34 PM Heathen has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by Legend, posted 08-11-2006 7:24 AM nator has not replied

  
Legend
Member (Idle past 5006 days)
Posts: 1226
From: Wales, UK
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 48 of 63 (339147)
08-11-2006 7:24 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by nator
08-11-2006 6:13 AM


let's make it available to the public
I sincerely hope the evidence for this plot becomes available to the public quickly.
And by evidence, I mean the explosives, detonators, statements of intent, etc.
Not the "he had an airplane poster on his bedroom wall", kind of evidence.

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by nator, posted 08-11-2006 6:13 AM nator has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 49 of 63 (339149)
08-11-2006 7:59 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by CK
08-10-2006 8:22 AM


Looks like a little more than an alleged plot.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by CK, posted 08-10-2006 8:22 AM CK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by CK, posted 08-11-2006 10:29 AM riVeRraT has not replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4127 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 50 of 63 (339166)
08-11-2006 10:29 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by riVeRraT
08-11-2006 7:59 AM


Well to be fair it does to me and it did yesterday - however hard experience has taught me that nothing is quite what it seems.
The ricin plot was pretty much the same in terms of it's reporting and the evidence presented to the public - well until the point when they let them all go.
So you'll forgive me for mentally pegging this as "alleged" until we see a trial.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by riVeRraT, posted 08-11-2006 7:59 AM riVeRraT has not replied

  
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.7


Message 51 of 63 (339263)
08-11-2006 3:05 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by cavediver
08-10-2006 6:22 AM


CaveDiver, now that at least one of the suspects has been revealed to be white - do you still think we should be using profiling?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by cavediver, posted 08-10-2006 6:22 AM cavediver has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by CK, posted 08-12-2006 11:31 AM Dr Jack has not replied
 Message 56 by Tal, posted 08-12-2006 4:53 PM Dr Jack has not replied

  
Heathen
Member (Idle past 1283 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 52 of 63 (339280)
08-11-2006 3:34 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by Omnivorous
08-10-2006 9:20 PM


Re: Full disclosure
omni writes:
storming the cabin
Is that what the kids are calling it nowadays?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Omnivorous, posted 08-10-2006 9:20 PM Omnivorous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by Omnivorous, posted 08-11-2006 10:28 PM Heathen has not replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3978
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.3


Message 53 of 63 (339440)
08-11-2006 10:28 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by Heathen
08-11-2006 3:34 PM


Re: Full disclosure
Is that what the kids are calling it nowadays?
I dunno about the other kids, but I overheard my grandkids calling what I think you mean "screwing." I actually meant literally storming the cabin (I know you know this).
Recently I attended a play (Black Dahlia) which included a scene where a nude male actor ran across the stage and simulated sex with an actress. There was something remarkably funny about a flaccid, flopping penis in that fictional scene of passion--that's the absurdity I envisioned about naked men storming the pilot's cabin.
Probably their butts would look funny, too. I suspect people would be less aggressive under conditions of communal nudity--too vulnerable, too silly looking.
I was very amused that the grandkids were appalled to see I was listening. I put on a stern face and said nothing.
If they only knew what stories gramps could tell...

God gave us the earth. We have dominion over the plants, the animals, the trees. God said, ”Earth is yours. Take it. Rape it. It’s yours.’
--Ann Coulter, Fox-TV: Hannity & Colmes, 20 Jun 01
Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!
---------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Heathen, posted 08-11-2006 3:34 PM Heathen has not replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4127 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 54 of 63 (339523)
08-12-2006 11:31 AM
Reply to: Message 51 by Dr Jack
08-11-2006 3:05 PM


just to clarify
One of the suspects "Abdul Waheed" was formerly known as Don Stewart-Whyte.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Dr Jack, posted 08-11-2006 3:05 PM Dr Jack has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by Legend, posted 08-12-2006 6:32 PM CK has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 55 of 63 (339552)
08-12-2006 2:17 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by cavediver
08-10-2006 6:22 AM


The policy is to check EVERYONE at Heathrow and other airports this morning on the back of this huge terror alert. Is this necessary? Limited security resources are spread thin and disruption is maximised. Thus there are associated financial and security risks with this policy. How necessary is this policy? At what scale does this policy becomes untenable?
Here's the problem: You don't increase security after a significant threat was established after-the-fact. When 9/11 occured, I was in the military at that time, working as a military police. We went from low drag to high speed in 5 minutes after the fact. All of a sudden, we checked every single vehicle that passed through our gates, whether they were a civilian or a two-star Admiral. This frantic inspection continued for a week straight and then slowly subsided into a lackadaisical apathy (or at least when compared to the preceding days after 9/11). The point is, if you're gonna be high-speed and tactical, then do it all the time, not when the enemy is the most unlikely to attack. They are most likely to attack when we least expect. I mean, that is so cardinal that I actually trivialize it by mentioning it. The point I'm trying to make here, there is always a credible threat in the UK/US/Canada/Israel/Australia or any nation that embraces some sort of "due process." The 'good ole days' we grew up with are over. That's just the reality of it. And the problems of the Middle East have been thrust upon the Western world. That's just the way it is. Knowing this, its too late to go back to the way we were. As far as Heathrow and pretty much all Western airports being on high security, it will subside again, and all your toiletries will be back on the plane.
[still in the process of moving and only just got limited net connectivity installed, so apologies to all those I owe replies to from the past couple of weeks. will be back to normal in next couple of days]

“If chance be the father of all flesh then disaster is his rainbow in the sky. And when you hear of, state of emergencies, sniper kills ten, youths go looting, bomb blasts school, it is but the sound of man worshipping his maker” -Steve Turner

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by cavediver, posted 08-10-2006 6:22 AM cavediver has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by nwr, posted 08-12-2006 5:52 PM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 60 by nator, posted 08-12-2006 6:32 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Tal
Member (Idle past 5677 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 56 of 63 (339579)
08-12-2006 4:53 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by Dr Jack
08-11-2006 3:05 PM


Should we profile is a great questoin. El al (Israel's airline for those in Rio Linda) has been profiling for 30 years with great success. They've had zero attacks. That being said, if you profile for a certain group of people, the badguys will simply attempt to beat the profile. Enter female with 6 month old baby. Who would think a mother a with a 6 month old would blow herself and her baby up? Alas, Al Qaeda has been trying to recruit asians and caucasians for this very purpose. What I Don't agree with is when security officials let 3 arab men go by and then give white grandma a rectal exam because she was random #X.
On a side note, does anyone know how the Iranian military cleared mine fields during the Iran/Iraq war? Families would send their kids to the Irainian engineers with little gold keys tied around their necks. These kids would then run across a minefield and blow up. The key is supposed to be the key to paradise.
But what does a 6 month old baby do with 72 virgins?
But, that is the culture we are dealing with.

People don't kill people
Cartoons kill people

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Dr Jack, posted 08-11-2006 3:05 PM Dr Jack has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-13-2006 1:49 AM Tal has not replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6408
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.1


Message 57 of 63 (339611)
08-12-2006 5:52 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by Hyroglyphx
08-12-2006 2:17 PM


This frantic inspection continued for a week straight and then slowly subsided into a lackadaisical apathy (or at least when compared to the preceding days after 9/11). The point is, if you're gonna be high-speed and tactical, then do it all the time, not when the enemy is the most unlikely to attack.
I agree - if the purpose of the inspections is to stop terrorist attacks.
But what if the whole purpose of the inspection is to instill fear into the population, so that they are more likely to vote for the incumbents in the next election?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-12-2006 2:17 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by Chiroptera, posted 08-12-2006 6:05 PM nwr has seen this message but not replied
 Message 63 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-13-2006 1:52 AM nwr has seen this message but not replied

  
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 1.9


Message 58 of 63 (339615)
08-12-2006 6:01 PM


I have a problem with profiling. Unless we assume that Muslims are moderate as anyone else until proven otherwise we will marginalize them them and make extremism more attractive to them.
I do believe that we have to start from the premise the we are all created equal. I don't believe that doing the wrong thing will bring the right response. Once we give up our principles we have lost as we have nothing of value left to protect.
It is also my opinion that the terrorists would like nothing better than for us to start discriminating against western Muslims. Nothing would be more helpful to their recruitment drive.
In the end our best weapon against Islamic terrorism is the moderate Muslim. Both this latest case and the case in Canada had happy endings largely because of assistance from moderate Muslims.

Everybody is entitled to my opinion.

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 59 of 63 (339617)
08-12-2006 6:05 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by nwr
08-12-2006 5:52 PM


Or if the purpose is to snoop out and keep track of those who might diagree with government policy? Or at least to put a chill in the activiites of such people?

"These monkeys are at once the ugliest and the most beautiful creatures on the planet./ And the monkeys don't want to be monkeys; they want to be something else./ But they're not."
-- Ernie Cline

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by nwr, posted 08-12-2006 5:52 PM nwr has seen this message but not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2169 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 60 of 63 (339638)
08-12-2006 6:32 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by Hyroglyphx
08-12-2006 2:17 PM


quote:
Here's the problem: You don't increase security after a significant threat was established after-the-fact.
Yeah, it's too bad that the Bush White House took so much focus off of Bin Laden in specific and terrorism in general once they got into office.
Edited by schrafinator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-12-2006 2:17 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024