Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,822 Year: 4,079/9,624 Month: 950/974 Week: 277/286 Day: 38/46 Hour: 3/7


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Ancient bacteria with modern DNA, problem for evolution?
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 311 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 14 of 77 (340139)
08-15-2006 12:56 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by randman
08-14-2006 9:14 PM


Re: selective acceptance of data
Heck, even the critics of Vreeland state the tactics used to prevent contanimation are "herioc",but that doesn't really matter. They will argue any fact that disagrees with them must be the result of contanimation or some other issue.
Yes, quite. "Even the critics" will describe the certain measures Vreeland took as "heroic", and that proves him RIGHT RIGHT RIGHT.
But when they suggest that he's done something wrong, then they will "argue any fact" because they're BIASED BIASED BIASED. But not too biased to use the word "heroic". Because of course the huge evil conspiracy of scientists everywhere isn't quite that mean.
Sheesh.
What drives me up the wall is that not only won't creationists take the time to learn about science; they also also refuse to learn anything about the six billion human beings amongst whom they live.
They are cut off not just from science but from people. They can't imagine that people are people, when this statement is a truism.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by randman, posted 08-14-2006 9:14 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by randman, posted 08-15-2006 9:10 AM Dr Adequate has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024