randman writes:
Evos start with ToE as the primary fact and then use that to argue whether data is correct or not, and then claim because all the data they accept agrees with ToE, that the theory is substantiated. It's circular reasoning.
The line about pots and kettles springs to mind...
"[Creationists] start with [the Bible] as the primary fact and then use that to argue whether data is correct or not, and then claim because all the data they accept agrees with [the Bible], that the theory is substantiated. It's circular reasoning."
Even if your assertions
were true (which they aren't) they would still be a mirror-image of your own reasoning!
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.
™ Version 4.2
