Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,799 Year: 4,056/9,624 Month: 927/974 Week: 254/286 Day: 15/46 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is there really such a thing as a beneficial mutation?
Jazzns
Member (Idle past 3938 days)
Posts: 2657
From: A Better America
Joined: 07-23-2004


Message 138 of 223 (343296)
08-25-2006 11:23 AM
Reply to: Message 112 by Faith
08-25-2006 7:16 AM


Re: Trade-offs
But it is not anthropomorphizing anything to suspect that what is observed of what IS healthy could not possibly have come about by a system that pits disease against disease
What about all of the examples given that DONT pit disease against disease?
What about Hemoglobin C?
There have been others upthread. What about those? You seem to be so focused on the SCD vs malaria example.

Of course, biblical creationists are committed to belief in God's written Word, the Bible, which forbids bearing false witness; --AIG (lest they forget)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 112 by Faith, posted 08-25-2006 7:16 AM Faith has not replied

  
Jazzns
Member (Idle past 3938 days)
Posts: 2657
From: A Better America
Joined: 07-23-2004


Message 139 of 223 (343307)
08-25-2006 11:33 AM
Reply to: Message 114 by Faith
08-25-2006 7:36 AM


Basic Faith Tactics appear when failure is inevitable
I know you think the short list of beneficial mutations so far discussed on the other thread is sufficient evidence that this could be the cause of all traits, but I simply despair of anyone's seeing how obviously it can't possibly be so.
When all else fails, simply declare your position to be "obviously" true and abandon any and all rational discussion on the issue.
Build a misrepresentation of sedimentology and call it "obviously" absurd to occur over millions of years.
Build a misrepresentation of mutation and call it "obviously" impossible to drive evolution.
As long as this is your mode of discussion Faith, how do you expect anybody to take you seriously. The thigns you think are "obvious" first, are not based on a complete understanding of the mechanisms and second, are not "obvious" to anyone else but you.
And I know you despair of my seeing how it is.
I would replace dispar with pity. I don't think anyone here likes to see ignorance.

Of course, biblical creationists are committed to belief in God's written Word, the Bible, which forbids bearing false witness; --AIG (lest they forget)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by Faith, posted 08-25-2006 7:36 AM Faith has not replied

  
Jazzns
Member (Idle past 3938 days)
Posts: 2657
From: A Better America
Joined: 07-23-2004


Message 143 of 223 (343312)
08-25-2006 11:52 AM
Reply to: Message 141 by Faith
08-25-2006 11:43 AM


Just because you don't like someone pointing out where you are basing your discussion on ignorance all of a sudden becomes abusive?
I am not calling you supid. I am pointing out that your position is based on ignorance.
You are also dodging all of the good examples that claimed you wanted to discuss. How many times has schraf or someone else asked you about the CCR5 gene? How many times has the Hemo C mutation been brought up. Or all the examples in crashfrogs post awhile back?
What is wrong with these examples? Why are they not good enough for you? You can't just run in here and say that they are "obviously" not good enough and expect your position to be respected at all.

Of course, biblical creationists are committed to belief in God's written Word, the Bible, which forbids bearing false witness; --AIG (lest they forget)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by Faith, posted 08-25-2006 11:43 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 162 by Faith, posted 08-25-2006 5:36 PM Jazzns has replied

  
Jazzns
Member (Idle past 3938 days)
Posts: 2657
From: A Better America
Joined: 07-23-2004


Message 164 of 223 (343391)
08-25-2006 5:44 PM
Reply to: Message 162 by Faith
08-25-2006 5:36 PM


So has Aegist among others.
Others such as myself, crashfrog, and Aegist have also given more examples than CCR5.
The example that seems to permeate this discussion based on SCD is also no longer an issue when concerning Hemoglobin C. That is the one I brought up because of your specific complaint of pitting "disease against disease". The only negative effect of Hemo C is slight anemia and it is a novel allele. It meets all your critera for a beneficial mutation. It is something that was not part of the previous genetic potential. It does not confer a disease. It provides a substantial benefit to those that have it.

Of course, biblical creationists are committed to belief in God's written Word, the Bible, which forbids bearing false witness; --AIG (lest they forget)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 162 by Faith, posted 08-25-2006 5:36 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 171 by Faith, posted 08-25-2006 6:00 PM Jazzns has replied

  
Jazzns
Member (Idle past 3938 days)
Posts: 2657
From: A Better America
Joined: 07-23-2004


Message 173 of 223 (343401)
08-25-2006 6:06 PM
Reply to: Message 171 by Faith
08-25-2006 6:00 PM


So the piddly examples and the stuff that upset you gives you motive to completely ignore all the good stuff that was posted on this thread?
I guess I just don't understand why? How is this NOT an excuse to dodge?

Of course, biblical creationists are committed to belief in God's written Word, the Bible, which forbids bearing false witness; --AIG (lest they forget)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 171 by Faith, posted 08-25-2006 6:00 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 175 by Faith, posted 08-25-2006 6:12 PM Jazzns has replied

  
Jazzns
Member (Idle past 3938 days)
Posts: 2657
From: A Better America
Joined: 07-23-2004


Message 177 of 223 (343407)
08-25-2006 6:58 PM
Reply to: Message 175 by Faith
08-25-2006 6:12 PM


It just seems like you are throwing the baby out with the bathwater as an excuse not to deal with some real examples.
I personally think that the wisdom teeth example is a bad example. There are better ones upthread that are great fodder for discussion.
Crash's discussion is simply stating the obvious tenent of the ToE. There should be nothing suprising about that. Yes it was a catchall but that should not distract from the very good specific examples that were presented.
The deck is stacked. This whole thing is a monstrously ridiculous pathetic exercise in futility.
You are not required to respond to things you feel are unfair or where you feel "definitionally eliminated". You asked about beneficial mutations, canidates for beneficial mutations have been presented, you have chosen to focus on the other issues that you are now proclaiming to detest.
There are real good examples of exactly what you wanted sitting upthread. It very much seems like all this posturing is just an excuse to not to have to deal with those.

Of course, biblical creationists are committed to belief in God's written Word, the Bible, which forbids bearing false witness; --AIG (lest they forget)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 175 by Faith, posted 08-25-2006 6:12 PM Faith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024