Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9073 total)
83 online now:
dwise1, nwr, Tanypteryx (3 members, 80 visitors)
Newest Member: FossilDiscovery
Post Volume: Total: 893,241 Year: 4,353/6,534 Month: 567/900 Week: 91/182 Day: 25/38 Hour: 0/3

Announcements: Security Update Released


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is there really such a thing as a beneficial mutation?
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 681 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 194 of 223 (343502)
08-26-2006 3:23 AM
Reply to: Message 193 by Wounded King
08-26-2006 3:13 AM


Re: Trade-offs
You don't need to discount anything. And my having my own definition does not in any way erect a straw man of your definition. Your definition remains intact. I simply find it inadequate for dealing with the realities that interest me. It's fine for it to be recognized, and for the various mutations to be explored in its light, but when you impose it on me, require that I accept it, and treat my objections as simply a refusal to be scientific, you don't seem to recognize that all you are doing is absolutely pre-empting any possibility of having a different point of view about the very question we are discussing.

You may be right that Aegist can't go far with his worthy attempt at ecumenical dialogue as it were, but I hope you're wrong.

Why this demand for workable definitions? Sometimes we only have a ballpark idea of what we are getting at. That doesn't disqualify the effort at all. Sorry for the problem of ambiguity but that's the way reality often is. Aegist seems to get the ballpark idea. It's not that difficult.

Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

Edited by Faith, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 193 by Wounded King, posted 08-26-2006 3:13 AM Wounded King has taken no action

Replies to this message:
 Message 195 by Hawks, posted 08-26-2006 3:49 AM Faith has taken no action
 Message 197 by ReverendDG, posted 08-26-2006 5:00 AM Faith has taken no action
 Message 202 by nator, posted 08-26-2006 8:27 AM Faith has taken no action

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 681 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 204 of 223 (343571)
08-26-2006 11:47 AM
Reply to: Message 200 by Aegist
08-26-2006 6:44 AM


Re: Trade-offs
I really appreciate your attempt to get into my frame of reference, and at a quick read I think you are doing rather well at it, but I will have to think about it more.

But I also think I should not contribute to this thread any more because what always happens is that my main concerns are labelled unscientific and this is a science forum, so I think I will probably try to come up with a mirror thread on these topics for the Theological Creationism and ID forum and if you are still up to it maybe this can be further pursued there.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 200 by Aegist, posted 08-26-2006 6:44 AM Aegist has taken no action

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 681 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 205 of 223 (343574)
08-26-2006 11:56 AM


Regrouping
The original plan that prompted the writing of the OP was to have a thread that simply explored particulars of mutation, with a focus on what beneficial means, in which my role would be mostly to ask questions while avoiding giving my own perspective. I don't know how I got so off track as to write the OP I did, since it doesn't reflect that original idea, but I did and now I'm embroiled as usual in defending my views, and simply discussing the particulars of mutation just isn't going to happen here for me.

Wounded King started another thread at the same time, because I'd asked him to, for the same purpose, to explore mutations, and unfortunately I didn't see his thread and went ahead and wrote my own. However, his thread, Mutation and its role in evolution: A Beginner's Guide, rather than succeeding as a beginner's guide, for me in any case, is so far over my head that it too is not useful for the original purpose of elucidating the mechanisms of mutation. It also isn't particularly focused on the question of what a beneficial mutation is, which is really the main concern.

Maybe I will find a way to reorient myself to either or both of these threads, or maybe eventually a new thread can be put up that does succeed at the original objective, but for now I don't see much value in my continuing to fight the usual battle in the face of all the objections, so I will probably try to organize a new thread for the Theological Creationism and ID forum.

Edited by Faith, : No reason given.


Replies to this message:
 Message 207 by Brad McFall, posted 08-26-2006 1:01 PM Faith has replied
 Message 208 by nwr, posted 08-26-2006 1:08 PM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 681 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 209 of 223 (343595)
08-26-2006 1:16 PM
Reply to: Message 207 by Brad McFall
08-26-2006 1:01 PM


Re: Re:closed group
Drat, Brad, I wish I could follow your posts better, because sometimes there appears to be the glimmer of a flash of illumination that is badly needed on this subject, and I appreciate your historical perspective on it in particular, all the various quotes you provide from such as Huxley and Kant and so on, but wow, your language is so confusing I just can't follow you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 207 by Brad McFall, posted 08-26-2006 1:01 PM Brad McFall has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 211 by Brad McFall, posted 08-26-2006 1:18 PM Faith has taken no action

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 681 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 212 of 223 (343602)
08-26-2006 1:24 PM
Reply to: Message 208 by nwr
08-26-2006 1:08 PM


Re: Regrouping
I appreciate the distinction, but the whole thing is hypothetical in any case, this idea that this directionless or nonteleological or nonintentional change -- in dialectic, as it were, with environmental conditions -- has produced what exists. Intuitively, just from what I've learned so far about the different forms of mutations, no way could those changes explain what exists. I hardly see that my intuition is any less scientific than the intuition that says otherwise; both are pure guesses and both rely on hypothetical thinking to justify them.

Edited by Faith, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 208 by nwr, posted 08-26-2006 1:08 PM nwr has seen this message

Replies to this message:
 Message 213 by Brad McFall, posted 08-26-2006 1:34 PM Faith has taken no action
 Message 216 by Admin, posted 08-27-2006 10:08 AM Faith has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022