Hypermacroevolution? Hypermicroevolution

Mjfloresta, you have a talent for making statements that sound clearly thought out, but are in fact devoid of content. Well represented? Do they exist or do they not? Did they exist at all? Where can evidence of them be found? What evidence makes this "likely"?

So if I say off the top of my head that it is "likely" that humans evolved from space unicorns, is that a good hypothesis?Oh, and what creationist model are you talking about? The one that defies all attempts at definition?Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.

Okay, so if you have a hypothesis then you should also have some means of demonstrating it.Show us the evidence that supports your model. Until that time your (and MJ's) YEC assertions will remain as baseless as my space unicorn hypothesis.

Ah, but you seem to forget that there is much more work to be done! Your hypothesis has to work on multiple levels.You have yet to show how such change could have happened over only 4000 years. You have yet to show how the animals found their way to that part of the world in the first place. You have yet to define a "kind" that might have given rise to the species in question.

There is no evidence in biology or paleontology for hypermacroevolution, therefore the ToE rejects it. There is no evidence in geology for a global flood, therefore the ToE rejects it.And you say you're using the same evidence? Don't make me laugh!