Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,480 Year: 3,737/9,624 Month: 608/974 Week: 221/276 Day: 61/34 Hour: 4/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   But what about before that?
Percy
Member
Posts: 22480
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 11 of 21 (34515)
03-16-2003 1:57 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Oblio
03-16-2003 12:46 PM


Re: big bang..lol
Oblio writes:
the big bang defies most physical laws, such as the law of biogenesis and entropy.
the law of biogenesis states that life can only come from where life already existed.. not out of spontaneous explosions.
There's no such thing as a "law of biogenesis".
the fact that 2 of our planets spin in opposite directions, with no major dent indicating a collision shows that they couldnt have come from the same source, ie an big bang..
The solar system did not originate from the Big Bang. The two are not closely related in time at all. The Big Bang was about 13.7 billion years ago, the origin of the solar system eons later about 4.6 billion years ago. The solar system condensed from nebular material sitting around in space, at least some significant portion of it having been scattered into space from earlier generation stars that went supernova.
Both Uranus and Venus rotate in the opposite direction from other planets, but you're probably thinking of Uranus since you mention a collision. It isn't Uranus's direction of rotation, but it's unusual tilt (about 98o), that caused scientists to propose a collision early in it's history as one possible explanation. The collision would not cause a permanent dent. Objects of planetary scale are very plastic and will always quickly return to a substantially spherical shape. The moon is thought to possibly be the result of a collision of a large object with the earth very early in our history, and there is no dent on earth, either.
finally the first organism, whatever scientists are claiming it was these days, would have needed all its vital functions, mouth, waste tract, eyes, digestive system, another whole organism to mate with...
The first life would have been very simple, a single-celled organism perhaps something like blue-green algae. It would have been the product of a long series of small, incremental stages over many millions of years.
plus some sort of protective system against the cosmic rays it would be battling due to the non present ozone layer that wouldnt have been there yet...
This is a fairly speculative area as there is much we don't know about the early earth, but there is no requirement that the first life evolved on the planet's surface. If radiation was a problem then the first life probably came about either underground or beneath the surface of water.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Oblio, posted 03-16-2003 12:46 PM Oblio has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Joralex, posted 03-17-2003 3:20 PM Percy has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024