Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,487 Year: 3,744/9,624 Month: 615/974 Week: 228/276 Day: 4/64 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   An Inconvenient Truth
DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3798 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 113 of 119 (345208)
08-30-2006 7:35 PM
Reply to: Message 107 by Silent H
08-29-2006 4:31 AM


Re: Global Warming
The question is if we will have MORE arable land than now. And that is a valid question. Certainly more will come available with rising temps and deglaciation, but will that offset losses in currently farmable land?
Deglaciation does not actually leave us with more land available for farming as the glacier scours out most if not all of the soil leaving the bare rock. As far as Canada and Alaska is concerned, much of Canada is made up of the Canadian shield, which is mostly unsuitable for highly intensive farming. Canadian Shield Much of the southern portion is made up of forests which would need to be harvested and the soil turned to agriculture, reducing the CO2 sink even further and I don't believe the soil is rich there either.
The Same could be said for Norway, Sweden and Finland. There isn't much land available.
I also have to wonder what the growing season would look like, with the upper latitudes not getting a lot of sun during winter.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by Silent H, posted 08-29-2006 4:31 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 114 by jar, posted 08-30-2006 7:47 PM DBlevins has replied
 Message 117 by Silent H, posted 08-31-2006 5:09 AM DBlevins has not replied

  
DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3798 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 115 of 119 (345220)
08-30-2006 7:56 PM
Reply to: Message 114 by jar
08-30-2006 7:47 PM


Re: Global Warming
Sure, we could easily add a ton of problems to be overcome. Much of what you bring up though, is a social or political problem area, which would be moot if there isn't the land available. I thought Holmes was speaking more directly of the geological availability of land as global warming occurs.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by jar, posted 08-30-2006 7:47 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by jar, posted 08-30-2006 8:03 PM DBlevins has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024