Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What mutations are needed for a particular trait (e.g. wings) to arise?
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 9 of 111 (345022)
08-30-2006 11:09 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by Archer Opteryx
08-30-2006 3:41 AM


just a couple questions
Are there also not intermediate examples of flight such as fish that soar and snakes and squirrels and several non-flying insects?
Doesn't the fossil record also show many, many failures, critters that had feathers but never developed the next step or critters that developed true flight but still died out or critters that were kinda in the direction of modern birds but also died out, were a deadend?
Edited by jar, : -e+-

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Archer Opteryx, posted 08-30-2006 3:41 AM Archer Opteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by Archer Opteryx, posted 08-30-2006 6:23 PM jar has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 21 of 111 (345149)
08-30-2006 6:18 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by skepticfaith
08-30-2006 5:40 PM


Re: Infinite possibilities?
However, if this entire process was designed to stack the deck in favor of useful beneficial mutations - we can get what we observe right now.
It kinda is, not towards creating beneficial mutations but only keeping those. The failures die. That is the filter called Natural Selection.
Of course this would imply either a designer or an intelligent process that is driving evolution.
No, not at all. It points to something that only keeps the successes.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by skepticfaith, posted 08-30-2006 5:40 PM skepticfaith has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 34 of 111 (345407)
08-31-2006 11:14 AM
Reply to: Message 33 by clpMINI
08-31-2006 10:57 AM


Re: Backward looking evolution
It's not even really beneficial and deleterious. What we see is "just barely good enough to get by" and "nope, didn't make the cut."
What we see if we look at living things is barely minimal design, the kid in shop class that gets the D- instead of the F. Almost nowhere do we find Good Design, Exceptional is even scarcer and Better than it has to be is almost non-existant.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by clpMINI, posted 08-31-2006 10:57 AM clpMINI has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 58 of 111 (345564)
08-31-2006 9:38 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by Archer Opteryx
08-31-2006 9:32 PM


Re: Summary ..
Can I ask another stupid question?
Isn't the only way to determine beneficial by hindsight?
It seems to me that the difference between a beneficial and not beneficial mutation is only which one passed the filter.
Is there something about a mutation that would make it beneficial or harmful other than the filter?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by Archer Opteryx, posted 08-31-2006 9:32 PM Archer Opteryx has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by ikabod, posted 09-01-2006 8:47 AM jar has not replied
 Message 60 by Hawks, posted 09-02-2006 5:00 AM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 62 of 111 (346016)
09-02-2006 11:25 AM
Reply to: Message 60 by Hawks
09-02-2006 5:00 AM


environment
To predict if a mutation would be beneficial might be more difficult, but given that an often given definition of a mutations is something like "A change in a DNA sequence", I'd like to give an example of a mutation that is highly likely to be beneficial in a certain environment: it is well known that bacteria often acquire resistance to antibiotics via horizontal gene transfer. Thus, a bacterium that has acquired an antibiotic resistance gene (which should fit the definition of a change in DNA sequence) would most likely have acquired a beneficial mutation (assuming that said antibiotic is common in it's environment and that the bacterium was not already resistant).
I agree with that but it brings in the filter, the environment.
What I am perhaps confused about it that we have had folk claim that mutations are "harmful or beneficial or neutral" and that then go on to assert that most mutaions are harmful.
That to me seems unreasonable.
As you mention there can be mutaions that are definitely harmful such as:
Since we know that certain genes are absolutely vital for survival, mutations that render these genes non-functional will by necessity be harmful (to conceive of such a mutation is easy - just delete the entire gene).
In such a case the critter dies, or is not born, or lives a short life and so that mutation simply does not get passed on.
It seems to me then that almost all the other mutations are neutral in and of themselves. If a mutation does not kill the critter or keep it from reproducing then it is neutral until it is filtered by the unique environment. The evironment then and not the mutation is what determines if that particular mutation is harmful or beneficial. Even then, there will be many mutations that are simply not critical as far as the filter is concerned, hair color, eye color, length of eye lashes, heart to the left or heart to the right, four fingers and a thumb or five fingers and a thumb.
All of those neutral mutations just get carried along, making little or no difference, just more or less sitting on the shelf, until some change in the filter, the environment might make them beneficial or harmful.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by Hawks, posted 09-02-2006 5:00 AM Hawks has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by Hawks, posted 09-03-2006 6:26 AM jar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024