Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,818 Year: 3,075/9,624 Month: 920/1,588 Week: 103/223 Day: 1/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The word Man is inherently confusing/sexist? Oh the huMANity!
nator
Member (Idle past 2170 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 25 of 90 (344064)
08-27-2006 9:06 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by Jazzns
08-27-2006 11:31 AM


Re: words and music
quote:
I think holmes is spot on about you and schraf. There are few on this board that are immune from thinking they are always right about something and resorting to what are commonly creationists tactics to avoid having to admit it.
I absolutely do not think I'm right about everything, and have accepted correction from many people.
If you think I've made a logical error or resorted to "creationist tactics" in any thread I've participated in, then why haven't you brought it up then, or now?
Please do not hesitate to do so.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Jazzns, posted 08-27-2006 11:31 AM Jazzns has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by Jazzns, posted 08-28-2006 12:07 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2170 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 30 of 90 (344288)
08-28-2006 1:14 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by Jazzns
08-28-2006 12:07 PM


Re: words and music
quote:
When reading yours and holmes I do tend to feel that holmes puts forth the better foot but that is just my subjective opinion.
He also puts forth many misrepresentations of my arguments that he then proceeds to easily demolish.
That he may argue effectively against some of my actual points is acknowledged, but the constant, protracted, yet futlie, chore of correcting his distortions and strawmen soured me against debating with him a long, long time ago.
I can understand, though, that someone reading along might get the impression that he is demolishing arguments left and right. He is doing this, of course, but sometimes the arguments are those of an opponent he has invented for himself.
quote:
Sorry to group you to heavily.
I thank you for that, and my invitation to point out to me any time I am engaging in logical errors or creationist tactics still stands.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by Jazzns, posted 08-28-2006 12:07 PM Jazzns has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by Silent H, posted 08-28-2006 2:57 PM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2170 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 87 of 90 (348088)
09-11-2006 9:44 AM
Reply to: Message 46 by Hyroglyphx
08-29-2006 5:49 PM


Re: What's at stake?
quote:
Of course not. Its not like they revel in the notion of masculinity, theyrevel in the notion of spinning together masculintiy with feminity so that there is this stagnate, androgenous, gender neutral society.
Exactly WHO revels in this notion?
Provide names, please.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-29-2006 5:49 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024