Defeating "Dr" Kent Hovinds' claims.

Please, PLEASE, pretty please open a new thread to support this position (I won't do it because I tend to avoid feeding trolls - if you're serious, you'll do the work). I even have a suggestion as to how:1. Select any current scientific discipline (for my tastes, I would prefer you pick one of the earth or life sciences, rather than physics or cosmology). Your choice.2. Elaborate on the methodology of "god science" (as contrasted to "godless science").3. Compare and contrast the methodology and results of "god science" vs. "godless science" and how each would apply to your chosen discipline. IOW, how "god science" provides better answers than "godless science".If you do, you'll be the very first ever. Note well: simply proclaiming that "godless science" is wrong without providing an alternative that gives at least as good results does not give us any reason to switch horses, here. If you have a methodology that works better, then this is your opportunity to present it and blow all those evil atheist scientists and "false Christians" out of the water. If you can't, then we'll just have to muddle (or is that Muhdle?) through with what we've got.