I think you are reading too much into Muhd's words. While it is true that many creationists and IDists present their god as a god that exists in the gaps between all the discoveries we have made, I don't think Muhd is one of them. His claim that
quote:
However I will say that evolution and other naturalistic theories are perpetuated in an effort to remove God out of the picture.
tells me he has the typical misunderstanding of what scientists do.
Just like most people in society, he probably finds his comfort into making up his mind about something and sets out to find evidence for whatever it is. For example, if he is convinced that the guy next door is a jerk, Muhd would go out and try to find every piece of evidence that suggests the guy next door is a jerk. Along the way, Muhd would probably find some evidence that suggest the guy next door is a nice person, but then since it contradicts what Muhd presupposes, the evidence is simply thrown out.
In other words, Muhd has a misunderstanding that scientists are some sort of angry heathens who try to disprove god. Science, according to Muhd, science should simply toss out all evidence that have no relevence to proving the existence of god. It's a rather sad view of the progresses we have made since the Dark Ages.
It's not that Muhd thinks his god exists in the gaps of knowledge. It's that he thinks the knowledge we have ARE the gaps between god.