Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,419 Year: 3,676/9,624 Month: 547/974 Week: 160/276 Day: 0/34 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Side Orders ⇒ Links and Information ⇒

Critique of The Exodus Decoded

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Critique of The Exodus Decoded
CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 5 of 10 (350197)
09-19-2006 7:20 AM 		Reply to: Message 4 by arachnophilia
09-19-2006 6:36 AM

If you rely on a popularist TV show in a debate you are totally fucked. When I see shows about my own area of research I literally scream at the telly.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by arachnophilia, posted 09-19-2006 6:36 AM arachnophilia has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by arachnophilia, posted 09-19-2006 7:38 AM CK has replied
 Message 9 by nator, posted 09-19-2006 10:42 AM CK has not replied
  
CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 7 of 10 (350209)
09-19-2006 7:53 AM 		Reply to: Message 6 by arachnophilia
09-19-2006 7:38 AM

We used to have a show here called "Reputations" or maybe "Secret lifes", something like that.
​
Each of the shows was the same, they'd start with an amazing claim such as "Was Winston Churchil a drug addict child abuser?", you'd then have an hour of bemused/confused experts going "no there is no evidence at all for that - it's nonsense!"
​
At the end, the show would have claimed to have debunked a rumour that never existed to start with!
​
Edited by CK, : No reason given.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by arachnophilia, posted 09-19-2006 7:38 AM arachnophilia has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024