What you will never understand, or accept, is that evolution has assumed the dominant position that it has because of the over 100 years that it has successfully served as the single unifying theory of biology. You, and others of your ilk, repeatedly assert that evolution is simply assumed, and that all the science that builds on it is based on that assumption. Since you refuse to fully examine the history of how evolution came to its dominance, it's fairly easy and comforting for you to repeat the mantra, "It's all an assumption."
Real science is done despite the faulty assumptions it rests on.
It would be amusing to hear you try to explain how "Real science" can be done based on "assumptions" that are as "faulty" as you think evolution is. I mean, you've written tens of thousands of words explaining why you think it has no basis in fact and no evidence to support it. You also seem to understand that evolution is the basis for most everything that is done in biology, and countless other fields, even though you dispute that evolution is true. Given these things, how would it be remotely possible for "Real science" to be done based on such a completely baseless "assumption?"
Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
™ Version 4.2