I feel so loved...
Someone who cares:
Exactly! That is what this specimen of Archaeopteryx most likely was, just a dinosaur, and engravings of feathers in the rock! Oh, and look at how straight and almost perfect like those feathers are, nicely spaced apart, rarely overlapping, OOOPS! The engraver was soooo busy making it perfect, that he/she forgot to make it REALISTIC!
And such a loss to art history, too.
If Rodin had been in town the museum wouldn't have had to hire that grad student.
If that fossil was formed, there must have been a great force that did it, and if there was a great force, we would expect to see the feathers all overlapping and some broken and bent, etc, but this specimen doesn't seem to show this, does it? I mean, imagine a force strong enough to fossilize feathers, ( hmmm...) and what the creature's feathers would be like from such a tremendous force... This looks like a nice fraud done by some evolutionists desperately seeking for "proof" and wanting to get some big bucks from a museum...
Everyone knows about the big bucks to be made in paleontology.
What they don't realize is that we really do need the money. Professional sculptors are expensive.
As for another specimen, the one with the reptile like fossil, and a feather next to it: That feather was most likely imprinited in rock and then put together with the reptile like fossil, as the slab grade and bubbles and color, etc, show. Most likely this was a fraud as well.
And a lot of work to boot. You have no idea how hard it is to imprint a feather on limestone without damaging the adjacent reptile bones, and then getting the bubbles and grain to match so no one can tell under museum lighting. This kind of thing really keeps us busy.
And we're talking about a small fossil. I thought I'd
never get those otter legs attached to our whale skeleton...
AND, even if it was a genuine fossil, it's still not a transitional fossil! I don't see any developing structures here...
Has anyone ever told you you have an amazing eye for art?
And you don't have any fossils that are transitional leading to and from Archaeopteryx, to show evolution, and to show that Archaeopteryx was anywhere in the "line" of evolution.
Actually we do.
We have
Hesperornis by William Henry Rinehart and
Compsognathus by Evelyn Beatrice Longman. We're especially proud of our
Velociraptor, an original by Camille Claudel.
The museum recently acquired a number of new pieces, of course, including a
Microraptor and
Protoavis by the renowned Chinese sculptor Liu Zhengde.
AND, it could be just a bird. Some birds have teeth you know... And claws on thier wings...
You're telling me it's a dinosaur with fake feathers.... unless the feathers are
real, and then it's just a bird?
Well, if the feathers on this
Microraptor are real I want my money back. I
paid for a genuine Liu.
Archer
All species are transitional.