So, if there was some super-genome, why are there no signs of it in the people, animals, plants, spores and pollen contemporary with Adam?
The answer is so obvious that I'm surprised you even have to ask the question. As we know, being that it is so well-documented, the only survivors of the flood were Noah and his kin, as well as organisms found in Noah's general vicinity. There's no evidence that he ever went to Italy, so none of the stuff generally found in Italy would be likely to have been included on the Ark (pizza, pasta, unicorns, that sort of thing). God, being the efficient fellow that he is, certainly wouldn't have wasted any of his super-genomes on organisms that weren't going to survive the flood anyway. I imagine the production costs of the super-genome were much higher than for your run of the mill stuff. Thus, there's no reason to suppose that the super-genome would be found in Italy. On the contrary, creationism clearly predicts that such genomes would NOT be found there. Thus, the absence of the super-genome actually SUPPORTS creationism.
You are simply misinterpreting the evidence in accordance with your pre-existing bias in favor of science, ... I mean evolution.
Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
™ Version 4.2
