Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,837 Year: 4,094/9,624 Month: 965/974 Week: 292/286 Day: 13/40 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Javier Solana, antichrist?
dynastywarrior4
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 4 (349690)
09-16-2006 9:13 PM


Hi, I just joined these forums, I just wanna see what some of you guysthink about the whole Javier solana as antichrist, and the rapture and tribulation and such. He's follows these certain things in the book of revelation. 10 nation as 10 horns? his office or some shit as 666, anyone could shed some light it'd be helpful?
Edit:
Javier Solana is the High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy.
Some facts to reasoning to why he is beilieved to be antichrist.
On June 5, 2000, the WEU adopted its Assembly Recommendation 666. This document recommended keeping the 10 Brussels Treaty Powers together as the EU's new military wing and giving the EU's High Representative emergency powers over the whole EU, putting the office holder over the EU presidency.
666 as mark of the beast.
In March of 2005, one year after the Madrid train bombings, world leaders met in Madrid to discuss the EU's and the international community's war against terror. The EU decided the U.S. war was going no where, nothing much had been accomplished over that last year. It was noted that the EU member states were reluctant to give Solana what he needed to get the job done. What this really meant was, the EU "big three" -- France, Germany and the UK -- were still standing in Solana's way. In other words, in order for Solana to do his job leading the EU's foreign and security policy, the EU "big three" must somehow be subdued. (See Bible quote above) Interestingly, the EU "big three" leaders were all on the scene in 1999 when the Office of High Representative was first occupied by Solana. And, they were all members of the 10-nation alliance. These 3 super countries could very well be the three kings who are destined to be subdued according to Daniel 7:24?
It is commonly believed the passage above foretells the rise of a strong leader from out of a revived Roman Empire who will make, or confirm, a covenant with the many for seven years. Israel will be included in this covenant. As far as Israel is concerned, he will violate his covenant 3 1/2 years later. In other passages from Daniel, we learn this leader will rise from among a 10-nation alliance (Daniel 7:7-8) and subdue three of the 10 kings (Daniel 7:24). In the New Testament book of Revelation, we learn that this leader will somehow be identified with the number 666 (Revelation 13: 18).
In December of 1998, at their Vienna summit, the EU's heads created the new Office of High Representative for Common Foreign and Security Policy for the European Union. The holder of this Office would direct their common foreign policy toward Russia, Ukraine and the Mediterranean. Out of over 1150 documents they generated at the summit, the document that created this Office happened to be numbered 666.
Fulfilled Prophecy Unreported News, Commentary, Resources and Discussion of Bible Prophecy
this site seems to full support that idea.
if you go through that site, they extensive referfences to the bible and where in the book of revelations it speaks of this.
Edited by dynastywarrior4, : No reason given.
Edited by dynastywarrior4, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AdminQuetzal, posted 09-16-2006 10:10 PM dynastywarrior4 has not replied
 Message 3 by AdminFaith, posted 09-16-2006 10:15 PM dynastywarrior4 has not replied
 Message 4 by AdminPhat, posted 09-27-2006 5:39 AM dynastywarrior4 has not replied

AdminQuetzal
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 4 (349698)
09-16-2006 10:10 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by dynastywarrior4
09-16-2006 9:13 PM


Needs Work
Hi dynastywarrior, and welcome to EvC Forum. We tend to try and encourage productive discussion here. One of the ways we do this is through the Proposed New Topics system. PNTs allow administrators and topic proposers to work out an acceptable opening post which focuses and stimulates discussion and debate.
I would like to suggest that modify your original post to provide a bit of background on the subject (not everyone is going to be aware of who Javier Solana is or what the controversy is about), as well as your personal take on the issue. If you wish to pursue the topic, simply reply to this post, and we'll take it from there.
As a further suggestion, although there are no specific rules concerning language on the forum, I would recommend cleaning up the idiom a bit - you'll find you'll get much better responses that way.
As it stands, I'm afraid this PNT is not promotable.
Again, welcome to EvC, and I hope you enjoy the discussions.
Edited by AdminQuetzal, : added links

"Here come da Judge." - Flip Wilson
Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
  • General discussion of moderation procedures
  • Thread Reopen Requests
  • Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
  • Proposed New (Great Debate) Topics
    New Members: to get an understanding of what makes great posts, check out:
  • "Post of the Month" Forum
  • "Columnist's Corner" Forum
    See also Forum Guidelines, [thread=-19,-112], and [thread=-17,-45]


  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 1 by dynastywarrior4, posted 09-16-2006 9:13 PM dynastywarrior4 has not replied

    AdminFaith
    Inactive Member


    Message 3 of 4 (349699)
    09-16-2006 10:15 PM
    Reply to: Message 1 by dynastywarrior4
    09-16-2006 9:13 PM


    Can you flesh this out a little?
    Sorry, overlapped with AdminQ, to whom I gladly defer.
    Edited by AdminFaith, : No reason given.


    This message is a reply to:
     Message 1 by dynastywarrior4, posted 09-16-2006 9:13 PM dynastywarrior4 has not replied

    AdminPhat
    Inactive Member


    Message 4 of 4 (352567)
    09-27-2006 5:39 AM
    Reply to: Message 1 by dynastywarrior4
    09-16-2006 9:13 PM


    Bump---are you still interested?
    Welcome to EvC. If you still want this topic considered, shorten it a bit, make it a tad more concise according to AdminQuetzals suggestions, and get back to us within 7 days (Oct 4th or so)

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 1 by dynastywarrior4, posted 09-16-2006 9:13 PM dynastywarrior4 has not replied

    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024