Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,356 Year: 3,613/9,624 Month: 484/974 Week: 97/276 Day: 25/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Does immunity disprove the fall?
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 7 of 66 (353661)
10-02-2006 3:15 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by AnswersInGenitals
10-02-2006 1:33 PM


Perhaps someone can help me understand something that has been bothering me for quite some time. From what I understand, disease and death are part of the punishment that god has meted out to mankind as a result of the fall and Adam's disobedience. Why then do we have immune systems that protect us from disease? Adam and Eve most probably didn't have immune systems, at least not initially, since they would have had no use for them. So why would god curse mankind with with disease and then give us a very complex and effective immune system to fight those very diseases? I realize that I am asking to understand the mind of god on this issue and that 'that is beyond our abilities' is a valid response, but I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts on this.
I hadn't thought about it until you asked, but my answer would be that Adam and Eve would have had a perfect immune system, as they would have been perfectly invulnerable to any harm that could conceivably have come to them from their environment. A big part of the devolution since the Fall, then, would be the gradual destruction of the immune system, but we still have quite a bit of protection left. Interesting in this context to consider that recent diseases specifially attack that system.
I am also curious about peoples thoughts concerning modern medicines ability to ameliorate disease and extend the human life span, more than doubling it in the last 200 years. Does this thwart god's purpose in inflicting us with disease? Or does the fact that most of that medical intervention, such as vaccinations, involves boosting the immune system, which god has already given us, mean that it is okay and not 'an abomination in the sight of the lord'?
God has always had mercy on his erring human creation and supplied knowledge of medicines of various sorts. He clothed his disobedient first couple with protective skins, and cursed the earth for their sake. He never stopped loving his human creation. I personally believe that the great proliferation of medical knowledge particularly in the West over the last few centuries is God's specific blessing for our Christian past. Which means I think we are on the way to losing that blessing as we have been losing our Christian identity.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by AnswersInGenitals, posted 10-02-2006 1:33 PM AnswersInGenitals has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by kuresu, posted 10-02-2006 4:23 PM Faith has replied
 Message 17 by AnswersInGenitals, posted 10-02-2006 4:54 PM Faith has replied
 Message 29 by Sonne, posted 10-03-2006 1:37 AM Faith has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 9 of 66 (353663)
10-02-2006 3:19 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by kuresu
10-02-2006 2:22 PM


Your guesses aren't far off.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by kuresu, posted 10-02-2006 2:22 PM kuresu has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 10 of 66 (353664)
10-02-2006 3:22 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Ben!
10-02-2006 3:09 PM


Although I have to say, I do enjoy reading the thicker-skinned Faith these days. Faith, when you cut through the crap, focus on the issues, and do you your best to answer questions, I can enjoy seeing you think through things.
Well, that's very good to know, Ben, thanks. I actually had the thought that if I stopped snapping at people I might get boring -- not too seriously but I did have it. Glad to see that's wrong.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Ben!, posted 10-02-2006 3:09 PM Ben! has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 16 of 66 (353692)
10-02-2006 4:48 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by kuresu
10-02-2006 4:23 PM


Boosting mechanisms from environmental influences doesn't contradict anything. We're still talking about a TREND. The system is extremely complex.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by kuresu, posted 10-02-2006 4:23 PM kuresu has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 23 of 66 (353731)
10-02-2006 7:59 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by AnswersInGenitals
10-02-2006 4:54 PM


Faith writes:
my answer would be that Adam and Eve would have had a perfect immune system
This concept lends strong support to the belief that when god created Adam and Eve with free will, he knew that the fall was inevitable, that he in fact planned for it.
Yes, of course. God is omniscient and omnipotent. He would have planned for all contingencies down to the last moment on earth.
I have recently been leaning towards this belief as the most reasonable, although I don't know if human reasoning has any significance in these matters. But, it always irks me, as I'm sure it does you, when people talk of the gift of free will as though god were some jerk down the street tinkering in his garage without any clue as to the consequences of his actions. He must certainly have known, form even before the creation, exactly how things would play out in the garden.
Certainly.
Given this as being true, we then have the scenario: creation of world, man, and free will; inevitable, pre-ordained fall of man; man cursed to toil, hardship, disease, and death; redemption and salvation of man, who now expresses limitless gratitude. If this is the true pre-planned scenario, we now have a basis to understand what life is all about.
Good reasoning from the Biblical evidence I would say.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by AnswersInGenitals, posted 10-02-2006 4:54 PM AnswersInGenitals has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by NosyNed, posted 10-02-2006 8:37 PM Faith has replied
 Message 32 by mark24, posted 10-03-2006 4:50 AM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 24 of 66 (353734)
10-02-2006 8:09 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by AnswersInGenitals
10-02-2006 5:29 PM


Re: no it does not disprove the Fall,
But this is the whole story of creation told (twice) in less than a page. Just because details are in short supply, are we to understand that there were no details to provide? The exact path that A & E used to exit the garden is not named or described. Are we to understand that they just floated out? Exactly what foods Adam was to farm and what implements he was to use are not described or named. Are we to understand that...I just don't know what to understand if the absence of a detail means that the detail was truly absent. I could list hundreds of details that are not explicitly described in the text but that we know must have been in evidence at the time.
Excellent reasoning, AiG. Since your nom de plume suggests hostility to Biblical creationism I'm very surprised, but also very pleased to see that an opponent can think it through so clearly.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by AnswersInGenitals, posted 10-02-2006 5:29 PM AnswersInGenitals has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by AnswersInGenitals, posted 10-02-2006 8:50 PM Faith has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 28 of 66 (353774)
10-02-2006 9:52 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by NosyNed
10-02-2006 8:37 PM


Re: Contingencies???
Strictly speaking you are correct. In fact I wondered if I should use the word. I decided that it makes sense from the human point of view. We think in terms of contingencies that would arise from an event. God sees them all at once of course so they aren't contingencies but it's reasonable for us to speak of them in such terms.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by NosyNed, posted 10-02-2006 8:37 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 39 of 66 (353984)
10-03-2006 6:03 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by mark24
10-03-2006 4:50 AM


If he's all-knowing then he knew man would screw up, he knew the fall would happen. He knew it couldn't be any other way, or the notion that god is omniscient is falsified. The logical corollary of an omniscient god is that he knew he was making men flawed, & the fall is falsified. How can man "fall" further in god's view, when he knew they were made fallen?
He did not make men flawed but perfect, and with free will. This is the consistent error so many of you commit. It is not a flaw to have free will and therefore the nearly inevitable ability to disobey God, but it is only inevitable because we are creatures. So many here will insist that this is a flaw against all argument, so I don't argue it often, but I strongly disagree with that idea.
But this raises another point, why not start with the "fall" already in effect? Why go through the motions of setting someone up in a situation that they have to fail in (the forbidden fruit)?
It is impossible to start with the Fall in place since it is the result of the action of disobedience. The Fall was simply what eventually happens to a creature given free will. We cannot resist disobeying at some point. God's plan still gives us a choice -- to choose His method of salvation or not, so that it is still up to us. In the end only those who really want God will have Him, and God will have people who truly love Him and worship Him.
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein.
AdminPD
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by AdminPD, : Off Topic Warning

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by mark24, posted 10-03-2006 4:50 AM mark24 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by AnswersInGenitals, posted 10-03-2006 6:46 PM Faith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024