If I put strange and charm into the
arxiv physics archive I get 223 results hardly concepts not understood, or used at all, by scientists.
Similarly searching for 'beauty quark' gives me 28 hits including...
Measurement of open beauty production at HERA in the D* muon final state
Truth is the companion property to beauty in terms of quarks, the more prosaic use the terms 'top' and 'bottom'. Admittedly I can only find 4 Arxiv references to Truth quarks.
Evolution of morality is discussed in Darwin's "Descent of Man", and from there on endlessly by Darwinists.
Discussing the evolution of morality is very different from co-opting the word morality and using it out of context in a scientific theory. This sounds very much as if it is in exactly the usual context.
All you really seem to be saying is that if science comments on anything about which religion already holds an opinion the science becomes equivalent to religion itself, which is a pretty nonsensical argument, especially in those cases where the views held by the religious are patently wrong.
TTFN,
WK