the intellectual enemies of freedom

And physicists talk about strangeness, charm and even truth and beauty as properties of sub-atomic particles? Or indeed as people might do in general conversation.Any rationale for how this can count as specifically 'religious-language'? It doesn't seem in the least bit religious to me. The only word I can see that you might make even a semi-credible argument for would be morality and I would be interested in seeing your example of where this has been subverted through its use in 'science-theories'.TTFN,WK

If I put strange and charm into the arxiv physics archive I get 223 results hardly concepts not understood, or used at all, by scientists.Similarly searching for 'beauty quark' gives me 28 hits including... Truth is the companion property to beauty in terms of quarks, the more prosaic use the terms 'top' and 'bottom'. Admittedly I can only find 4 Arxiv references to Truth quarks. Discussing the evolution of morality is very different from co-opting the word morality and using it out of context in a scientific theory. This sounds very much as if it is in exactly the usual context.All you really seem to be saying is that if science comments on anything about which religion already holds an opinion the science becomes equivalent to religion itself, which is a pretty nonsensical argument, especially in those cases where the views held by the religious are patently wrong.TTFN,WK

You don't know what words mean, do you?TTFN,WKEdited by Wounded King, : No reason given.

Is word salad more like a fruit salad or a greek salad? Its certainly not much on the taste front.TTFN,WK