Percy, I have taken another peek at the latest in modern cosmology and find that nothing much has changed. All advances are still only theories most of which are based on variations on the Big Bang theory. If my baloney detector is even close to correct, and the Big Bang didn’t happen, then all of the advances in modern cosmology belong in the toilet.
And this, of course, is where
my baloney detector starts clicking. Because it is hardly likely that a non-physicist, with no mathematical background, is going to put Einstein straight.
I think that we can actually prove that the Big Bang didn’t happen and, to do this we must go back to basics.
You don't thing
cosmologists know basic physics?
Like Dr. adequate cited, the force of gravity between two objects is inversely proportional to the distance between them.
To the product of their masses over the
square of the distance between them.
For any object in this universe, gravity is acting on it by all other objects in the universe. Like I mentioned in my original message, this action from all masses from all sides has the affect of holding and securing the original object in one place-at the center of the universe.
You appear to be claiming that every object is at "the center of the universe". This is patently not true.
Keeping this thought in mind and reviewing the idea that universe would be expanding if the Big Bang had happened, then why isn’t the mass of the object changing in response to the change in the distances of an expanding universe.
Why don't wombats explode every time I whistle the Star-Spangled Banner?
Well, why
should they?
Another thing, if the mass of the object is fixed, unchanging and, has a reasonable value (not infinite) then, it’s universe is not infinite or, if it is, gravitational attractions have a distance limit.
This is a complete
non sequitur. That objects have a fixed mass does not imply a finite universe or a limit on universal gravitation.
What is great about this, is that we are able to move about our universe. This freedom of motion is another indication of the kind of universe we live in. The smaller the object, the greater freedom it has to move. Atomic and subatomic particles enjoy the most freedom.
This is not true. subatomic particles are bound together by electromagnetic forces and the strong nuclear force. You ever seen a free quark?
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.
™ Version 4.2