How about a new Logo?

I like the last one best, but don't really like any of them, including the existing one. I also object to DNA being used to stand for evolution, while creationism is depicted in terms of religious art. Kind of begs the question.On the other hand, it does accurately represent the prejudices that run the show here...I also think if you're going to say creationISM you should say evolutionISM, treating both as cognitive constructs.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

God made simians. It doesn't work to have anything that exists as a representative for one side and not the other. Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

What is the objection to "evolutionism?"Evolution is the explanation for how life came about, as Creation is the explanation on the other side of the debate. CreationISM is the THEORIES that explain how it works out scientificially, so EvolutionISM ought to work for the evo theories on the other side.I know that abiogenesis is considered a separate issue and some evolutionists believe in an original creation that started evolution in motion, but we can't have perfect symmetry here.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.