Er, I don't think this proves anything at all. Although your webpage did have a nicely formatted table. That's about all I can reccomend, though.
Perhaps if you're interested in the nature of conciousness you might start by examining developments in cognitive psychology and neurobiology. Noam Chomsky's generative grammer could be a way to start. Also I reccomend the works of Douglas Hofstadter who ponders the relationships of art, logic, and human consiousness. He describes thought processes that are reminicent of computer-based object-oriented programming techniques.
(It's my personal view that consiousness is primarily a socio-linguistic phenomenon, a result of our use of words and symbols to refer to meaning. All I have to support this is the phenomenon of "feral children", humans who were denied exposure to language and as a result, lacked or were stunted in a number of the fundamental features of human conciousness. Obviously this isn't much in the way of "proof" but I find it very personally compelling. But then, I'm really into linguistics.)
------------------
Epimenedes Signature: This is not a signature.