Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,417 Year: 3,674/9,624 Month: 545/974 Week: 158/276 Day: 32/23 Hour: 2/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Haggard Scandal
nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 200 of 302 (361795)
11-05-2006 6:49 AM
Reply to: Message 159 by Hyroglyphx
11-04-2006 10:26 PM


Re: Drugs
quote:
I can see how Robertson fits in that criteria, but I've never really understood why Dobson is so despised by the irreligious.
He founded Focus on the Family.
That's why.
Who cares what they say? Millions of Americans, President Bush, and Carl Rove, and the NeoCon Leadership, that's who.
quote:
And to think, they should be listening to the tirades of Michael Moore.
Huh? That's no response, you can do better.
You asked who cares about what Dobson, Falwell, and the like think. Can it be that you are unaware that the NeoCons in the republican party have been pandering to the religious right in order to win elections?
quote:
I voted for neither. But I did have the fortune of meeting John Kerry and telling him that he and his running mate had better hair than his opposition. He was visibly irritated and walked away from me to shake the hands of his supporters.
Well, if you voted for Bush, you voted for people who have imposed their religious views on me and my friends.
And I don't blame Kerry for being irritated. It was a rather vapid thing to say to a serious man.
quote:
Nothing forces you to live as I do.
Oh? Can I legally get married to another woman?
quote:
But if that really were the case, wouldn't that imposition be the same for me?
Well, yes, but you don't see it as an imposition because you already choose to live like that.
quote:
I see it as them trying to pass laws that protect its citizens. Even the most liberal of Democrats wants that. We just differ in our opinion of what we best support and defend its citizens.
I thought Conservatives were supposed to be all about less government interference in citizen's lives?
Why is the gender of my fiancee the government's business?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 159 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-04-2006 10:26 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 212 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-05-2006 12:57 PM nator has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 201 of 302 (361796)
11-05-2006 6:51 AM
Reply to: Message 169 by Archer Opteryx
11-05-2006 12:11 AM


Re: a study in contrasts
excellent!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 169 by Archer Opteryx, posted 11-05-2006 12:11 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 202 of 302 (361798)
11-05-2006 6:59 AM
Reply to: Message 134 by Hyroglyphx
11-04-2006 2:41 PM


Re: nemesis_juggernaut's moral standard refuted by Haggard ... et al
quote:
Take a little child who has formal understanding of right or wrong, or even death, down to the clinic and let them watch it. Would they not be horrified?
Take them to watch abdominal surgery or a heart bypass operation and the reaction will probably be similar.
Why don't you take them to watch a woman dying of complications from pregnancy?
Edited by schrafinator, : No reason given.
Edited by schrafinator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-04-2006 2:41 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 213 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-05-2006 1:05 PM nator has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 203 of 302 (361799)
11-05-2006 7:04 AM
Reply to: Message 196 by RickJB
11-05-2006 5:32 AM


Re: nemesis_juggernaut's moral standard refuted by Haggard ... et al
quote:
Most pro-abortion supporters take a nuanced, "relative" view of abortion. Most will certainly concede that abortion is itself unpleasant, but they nevertheless argue that a woman must have the right to control her own reproductive capability.
Please don't refer to the movement as "pro-abortion". I am not "pro-abortion". I am "pro-life", but I also support a woman's right to control her own body.
Pro-Legalized Abortion and Anti-Legalized Abortion are the least value-laden, emotional terms to use, and I think that terms are important.
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein.
AdminPD
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning

This message is a reply to:
 Message 196 by RickJB, posted 11-05-2006 5:32 AM RickJB has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 204 by RickJB, posted 11-05-2006 8:31 AM nator has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 260 of 302 (361983)
11-05-2006 6:34 PM
Reply to: Message 212 by Hyroglyphx
11-05-2006 12:57 PM


Don't have time to respond to the rest, but...
quote:
We already know his sense of humor about his own military is about as funny as a swift kick to the genitals.
He never disparaged his own military.
Also, he never sent them into battle underequipped, undermanned, and with no clear strategy for how to get them out.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 212 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-05-2006 12:57 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 262 of 302 (361985)
11-05-2006 6:35 PM
Reply to: Message 212 by Hyroglyphx
11-05-2006 12:57 PM


Re: Drugs
quote:
Aside from which, can I marry a little boy or girl? Can I marry my dog? Are the forces of oppression working against me?
What part of "consenting adult" do you have trouble understanding?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 212 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-05-2006 12:57 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 266 by Taz, posted 11-05-2006 6:47 PM nator has not replied
 Message 269 by Silent H, posted 11-05-2006 7:00 PM nator has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 268 of 302 (361993)
11-05-2006 6:55 PM
Reply to: Message 213 by Hyroglyphx
11-05-2006 1:05 PM


Re: nemesis_juggernaut's moral standard refuted by Haggard ... et al
quote:
Being physically disgusted at the sight of blood and internal organs is not the same as recognizing when a person is being killed.
Ah, now you are moving the goalposts.
quote:
The child may associate bloody knives with killing the wo/man on the table until told what surgery is.
Maybe.
quote:
Can you explain little severed heads coming out of the birth canal as just apart of surgery?
Most abortions are performed in the first trimester when the embryo is around an inch and a half long. Nobody's going to see "severed heads coming out of the birth canal" during a typical abortion.
quote:
You've mentioned this specious argument before which can only make me conclude that pregnancy terrifies you. Perhaps you should do yourself a favor and just never procreate.
What, you don't think women die from pregnancy?
From the Wiki:
Maternal Mortality Ratio is the ratio of the number of maternal deaths per 100,000 live births. The MMR is used as a measure of the quality of a health care system. Sierra Leone has the highest maternal death rate at 2,000, and Afghanistan has the second highest maternal death rate at 1900 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births, reported by the UN based on 2000 figures. Lowest rates included Iceland at 10 per 100,000 and Austria at 4 per 100,000. In the United States, the maternal death rate was 17 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births in 2000. "Lifetime risk of maternal death" accounts for number of pregnancies and risk. In sub-Saharan Africa the lifetime risk of maternal death is 1 in 16, for developed nations only 1 in 2,800.
According to my math and after looking up some numbers, almost 700 women died from complications of child birth in the US in 2002.
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein.
AdminPD
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning

This message is a reply to:
 Message 213 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-05-2006 1:05 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 279 of 302 (362021)
11-05-2006 8:50 PM
Reply to: Message 269 by Silent H
11-05-2006 7:00 PM


Re: Drugs
quote:
If you believe there are no such things as universal standards, and in fact morals are relative, then you will have to concede that "consenting adult" is not a true absolute criteria and the situations he is describing could be considered equally valid.
I'd rather talk about reality than philosophical la-la lands.
"Consenting adult" in the culture and society we live in, right here in the US, right now in the 21st century, has a pretty firm meaning.
If there are universal morals or not is irrelevant to the discussion on gay marriage, IMO.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 269 by Silent H, posted 11-05-2006 7:00 PM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 289 by Silent H, posted 11-06-2006 4:53 AM nator has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 293 of 302 (362103)
11-06-2006 7:42 AM
Reply to: Message 290 by Archer Opteryx
11-06-2006 4:57 AM


Re: the oil opposition
quote:
I knew a Pentecostal man in the States who used to do that. He'd go out in the wee hours with other members of his 'home church' and daub oil on doorframes.
Anyone know why do they do this? I confess my own idea of a Wesson Oil party is a little different.
Well, I wonder if they "bless" the oil, thereby making it a magical substance, and then smear it on doorframes to offer some kind of protection to the people who live there?
It reminds me of what the Jews did for the first Passover.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 290 by Archer Opteryx, posted 11-06-2006 4:57 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 297 of 302 (362132)
11-06-2006 11:14 AM
Reply to: Message 296 by Hyroglyphx
11-06-2006 10:58 AM


Re: nemesis_juggernaut's moral standard refuted by Haggard ... et al
quote:
A relativistic code is more 'realistic' only in the sense that anyone at anytime can just make up whatever code they want and call it their pie in the sky.
All people do this anyway.
The point is, there are social consequences to behavior for everyone, regardless of the behavior allowed or prevented by their moral code.
My moral code may say that it's OK for me to walk around, punching random people in the face, but how far do you think I'm going to get in life doing that?
Edited by schrafinator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 296 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-06-2006 10:58 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 298 by Silent H, posted 11-06-2006 11:46 AM nator has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024