Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,828 Year: 4,085/9,624 Month: 956/974 Week: 283/286 Day: 4/40 Hour: 4/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Who's killing the GOP?
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 3 of 27 (363643)
11-13-2006 6:12 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by AnswersInGenitals
11-13-2006 5:20 PM


Newt Gingrich
I too would say, Newt Gingrich. Newt saw quite clearly that any party which could but through a Universal Health Care Plan was likely to hold control of the Congress for a quarter century at least. Since the Republicans (even though it had been a major part of the Republican Agenda since Nixon) were in no position to do so, he decided that the best course was to make sure that the Democrats could not. His campaign though used such scorched earth rhetoric that it then became impossible for the Republicans to propose one even when they were in position to implement one.
The long term effect of Newt's actions will likely mean that there are only two possible outcomes, either the US will continue to be the only industrialized nation without Universal Health Care, or that if implement, only a NON-Republican administration and Congress can implement one, fulfilling Newt's prediction. The Republicans will then be locked out of government for at least a quarter century.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by AnswersInGenitals, posted 11-13-2006 5:20 PM AnswersInGenitals has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by Silent H, posted 11-14-2006 6:24 AM jar has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 15 of 27 (363762)
11-14-2006 1:11 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by Taz
11-14-2006 1:06 PM


I don't think conservatives in this country understand that a constitutional amendment is the highest law of the land, which means more federal government intervention in people's lives.
One of the highest laws of the land. Treaties are also among the highest law of the land and can even supersede the Constitution.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Taz, posted 11-14-2006 1:06 PM Taz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by Chiroptera, posted 11-14-2006 1:31 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 17 of 27 (363773)
11-14-2006 1:41 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by Chiroptera
11-14-2006 1:31 PM


Look at what it says in Article VI of the Constitution:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Chiroptera, posted 11-14-2006 1:31 PM Chiroptera has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by Chiroptera, posted 11-14-2006 1:48 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 19 of 27 (363782)
11-14-2006 2:04 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by Chiroptera
11-14-2006 1:48 PM


So, in this regard, the Constitution, regular Federal law, and treaties are of equal stature in overruling any state's laws.
Correct. Treaties like the Constitution and Federal Laws are the law of the land.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Chiroptera, posted 11-14-2006 1:48 PM Chiroptera has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024