I was wondering how IDer's and Creo's handle fossils, particularly those that are in the Homo genus
Th ID and creationist position is that these alleged hominid fossils are nothing more than fossils of a race of chimpanzee, unknown extinct ape species or diseased humans.
However, another interesting question is that if "Man" is made in the image of God then how should we treat Chimpanzee's and Bonobo's that are near human and must be
"made, pretty darn near, in the image of God".
Why would God create a gradation of species that are close to being human? Why can human behavior be explained and extrapolated from more privative chimpanzee behavior?
I remember visiting Cheyenne mountain Zoo when I was a youngster and seeing Chimp's and Ape's for the first time close up. I was stunned at how remarkably similar to humans they looked. Their hands and fingernails were very close to my own. Their facial expressions and the they way they interacted with each other reminded me of my own kindergarten playground at recess
I think that was point that I started questioning the storybook creationist tale I was getting told at Sunday school. Maybe Zoo's should be banned.
If we were created by God, and we are all descended from Adam, then is Adam a H. sapiens or is he H. habilus or whichever Homo species is the oldest in the fossil record. And what is the implication of Adam being a H. habilus?
Whoa dude don't go there. Creationist our offended to think that Adam was anything but a full human.
However in thinking this way creationist have lowered the vision of God, the creator of all, to nothing more than a super primate. Not that is insulting.