Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,352 Year: 3,609/9,624 Month: 480/974 Week: 93/276 Day: 21/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Do I have a choice? (determinism vs libertarianism vs compatibilism)
DominionSeraph
Member (Idle past 4773 days)
Posts: 365
From: on High
Joined: 01-26-2005


Message 198 of 210 (364987)
11-20-2006 6:31 PM
Reply to: Message 188 by JavaMan
11-15-2006 11:34 AM


quote:
Don't confuse motion for freedom.
What do you mean?
If one must change, one is not free to stay the same. If one must change in a particular way, one is not free to change in any other.
Moving doesn't mean you're free -- it just means you're moving.
JavaMan writes:
Why do I need to be free to choose whether to suspend choosing or not?
You used the presence of the event as evidence of freedom. If it's forced upon you, it certainly isn't freely chosen.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 188 by JavaMan, posted 11-15-2006 11:34 AM JavaMan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 207 by JavaMan, posted 11-28-2006 7:47 AM DominionSeraph has not replied

  
DominionSeraph
Member (Idle past 4773 days)
Posts: 365
From: on High
Joined: 01-26-2005


Message 199 of 210 (365016)
11-20-2006 8:00 PM
Reply to: Message 197 by AdminOmni
11-20-2006 6:25 PM


AdminOmni writes:
But the clear communication of one's position and reasoning is a goal of this forum.
Something can be defined by the totality of what it is not.
Clear? Yes. Easy? No.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 197 by AdminOmni, posted 11-20-2006 6:25 PM AdminOmni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 200 by AdminOmni, posted 11-20-2006 9:21 PM DominionSeraph has not replied

  
DominionSeraph
Member (Idle past 4773 days)
Posts: 365
From: on High
Joined: 01-26-2005


Message 205 of 210 (365995)
11-25-2006 8:28 PM
Reply to: Message 202 by JavaMan
11-21-2006 8:28 AM


JavaMan writes:
My difficulty with the notion of learned behaviour is that it is rather a static, passive model of human behaviour. If we only act out the behaviour we've learned, how can behaviour change? In order to understand the dynamic aspects of behaviour, I think you need to understand what motivates people to do things - and I think at the root of motivation you always find the pursuit of pleasure and the avoidance of pain.
Learned behavior encompasses the motivation(s).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 202 by JavaMan, posted 11-21-2006 8:28 AM JavaMan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 206 by JavaMan, posted 11-28-2006 7:35 AM DominionSeraph has replied

  
DominionSeraph
Member (Idle past 4773 days)
Posts: 365
From: on High
Joined: 01-26-2005


Message 209 of 210 (366703)
11-29-2006 12:55 AM
Reply to: Message 206 by JavaMan
11-28-2006 7:35 AM


JavaMan writes:
What do you mean?
You learn how the behavior relates to what you want. So, what you've learned encompasses what you want.
JavaMan writes:
But does the fact that I have to do something mean that I don't have any choice at all?
No. You have no choice if you're locked into doing one thing, so the question is whether the change could end up being different on a subsequent run (which would require another dimension of time).
Edited by DominionSeraph, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 206 by JavaMan, posted 11-28-2006 7:35 AM JavaMan has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024