You can't expect to make money in the long term gambling against the house. The rules are rigged to provide the house with a statistical advantage; you literally have to beat the odds to win at those games.
I agree wholeheartedly. I mean, Las Vegas wouldn't be multi-billion dollar industry if the house was losing as much as the average player who goes into their casinos everyday. The house always has an advantage. You could even apply it in biological terms. An individual might be successful on occasion, however, but if the population does extremely poorly, the specie will go extinct.
Poker (table, not video) is played against other players, not the house; the house is merely there to provide the table and the dealer, which they do for a slice of the pot. But they have no statistical stake in the rules. You can win at poker because you're on an equal footing, rules-wise, with everybody else.
This is ironic for me that everyone is talking about this subject because I just watched 'Rounders' last night and they went into this very subject.
Video poker is just another form of slot-machine gambling; the outcomes are programmed to favor the house. Statistically you can expect to win 98 cents for every dollar you spend.
And the bars love having them because they generate a higher revenue than just alcohol or billiard tables could produce alone. People sit, smoke, and drink at those machines for hours, dumping a ton of money into it. They know the machines they bought have an advantage. Afterall, if it wasn't lucrative they wouldn't do it. I told this acquaintance of mine to write down the money he put into the machines vs the income who received from it. I asked him to tabulate those figures over the course of a month. I told him that if he was putting more money into it per capita than he was taking home, that he is losing at the game and why play it if that's the case?
I think what happens is people win a few big hands and they start getting a big head about the whole thing. But until they can see the results over a long period of times, they'll continue thinking they are winning when they actually lose more money than they take home.
If the house stood an equal or worse chance to lose money instead of making it, how could they afford to run a casino? Why would they do it?
Exactly. The casinos aren't there themselves because of luck. They are there because they have the advantage.
Edited by nemesis_juggernaut, : edit to add
"The weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds, casting down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God." -2
nd Corinthians 10:4-5