Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The 'Triple Point' of the 4 universal forces?
Phalanx
Member (Idle past 5733 days)
Posts: 31
From: Old Bridge, NJ, US
Joined: 10-12-2006


Message 16 of 23 (367061)
11-30-2006 9:57 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by Utopia
11-30-2006 9:50 AM


here you go
I believe what you want can be found here
Not much of it makes sense to me, but have at it.

And the Ignorant shall fall to the Squirrels - Chip 2:54

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Utopia, posted 11-30-2006 9:50 AM Utopia has not replied

  
Son Goku
Inactive Member


Message 17 of 23 (367136)
11-30-2006 2:15 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Utopia
11-30-2006 9:50 AM


Quantum Field Theory
Quantum Field Theory(QFT) is a theoretical syntax or language (bear with me) created between the period 1928-1948 and expanded and perfected during the 1960s and 1970s, which unifies quantum mechanics and special relativity.
The reason I say language is because QFT is basically a mathematical language which is formulated so that it is grammatically impossible to state something which contradicts the basic principles of special relativity and quantum mechanics.
It is not a theory itself, but a mathematical language in which to write theories.
Since Particles are very small(quantum) and move fast or have high energies(relativity), this language is very useful when studying particle physics.
All our theories of particles are written in this language.
By the way, unfortunately, the wikipedia article is useless unless you already know the subject. Even more unfortunate is that very few books to the public ever mention Quantum Field Theory.
Edited by Son Goku, : Eh, "Bear with me", not "Bare with me".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Utopia, posted 11-30-2006 9:50 AM Utopia has not replied

  
Utopia
Junior Member (Idle past 5157 days)
Posts: 26
From: Boston, MA.
Joined: 09-19-2006


Message 18 of 23 (367139)
11-30-2006 2:21 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by New Cat's Eye
11-30-2006 9:56 AM


quote:
20th C = twentieth century
He wasn't talking about a specific theory but theory, in general, about particle physics and fields that happened in the twentieth century.
DUH!!! LOL
I'm less than 10 posts old on the EvC forum and my brilliance is already shining through :-)
Greg "a gentleman and a scholar" P.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by New Cat's Eye, posted 11-30-2006 9:56 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Open MInd
Member (Idle past 1274 days)
Posts: 261
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 19 of 23 (379957)
01-25-2007 10:08 PM


Why The Big Bang
I have heard of many scientific names, and the Big Bang sounds like the funniest one. We have some of the most complicated names for some of the most simple illnesses. Yet, the most complicated of all complications, the creation of this entire world, has not earned a better name than a big bang. This is a slightly better choice of words than boom bang woosh duh.

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by cavediver, posted 01-26-2007 8:44 AM Open MInd has not replied

  
subbie
Member (Idle past 1275 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 20 of 23 (379960)
01-25-2007 10:20 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by cavediver
11-29-2006 7:11 PM


I hope nobody minds a short interruption in an otherwise fascinating sounding but largely incomprehensible discussion.
ameniable
Meaning amiably amenable?
Carry on.

Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by cavediver, posted 11-29-2006 7:11 PM cavediver has not replied

  
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3664 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 21 of 23 (380058)
01-26-2007 8:44 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by Open MInd
01-25-2007 10:08 PM


Re: Why The Big Bang
Yet, the most complicated of all complications, the creation of this entire world, has not earned a better name than a big bang.
Great question, Open Mind, and welcome to EvC!
You're right, much of esoteric fundemental physics is dominated by nice easy catchy names... it's to give our brains a rest Some more good examples would be: String Theory, Colour, Black Hole, Membrane, and of course the best of all M-Theory!!!
To be fair, Big Bang was the rather derisory name that Hoyle gave the theory in disdain... unfortunately it stuck as it gives all sorts of horribly incorrect ideas of explosions and fireballs, etc

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Open MInd, posted 01-25-2007 10:08 PM Open MInd has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by Son Goku, posted 01-26-2007 9:49 AM cavediver has replied

  
Son Goku
Inactive Member


Message 22 of 23 (380072)
01-26-2007 9:49 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by cavediver
01-26-2007 8:44 AM


A fuzzy Moose.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by cavediver, posted 01-26-2007 8:44 AM cavediver has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by cavediver, posted 01-26-2007 10:37 AM Son Goku has not replied

  
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3664 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 23 of 23 (380086)
01-26-2007 10:37 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by Son Goku
01-26-2007 9:49 AM


Re: A fuzzy Moose.
I'm assuming you've read 'The Super G String', in one of the proceedings from the nineties (Strings 94?), which contains amongst numerous gems:
quote:
...where we use the Newton-Witten equation, F=ma...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Son Goku, posted 01-26-2007 9:49 AM Son Goku has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024