quote:
However, they cheated by excluding oxygen (By the law of diffusion, oxygen HAS ALWAYS been in the atmosphere, or it would not be today). They excluded oxygen because they knew that oxygen would oxidize (which creates rust and decay) the material and they would not form life successfully.
I am curious about these statements, because weren't oxygen scarce in the early earth (it was, and is, too reactive)? Atmospheric oxygen concentration started rising when photosynthesis was invented, about 1 billion years ago ((?) correct me if i'm wrong).
You do know the diffrence between the oxygen gas (O2) and the oxygen atom (O), do you?
quote:
Also, finding a skull that is half-human and half-ape DOES NOT prove evolution (it just proves that there was an animal that had both ape and human characteristics).
FYI, there are several human fossils that has been discovered, and put in context (time & morphological change) each made a part of a good, if incomplete, sequence. They're in the right age and shape to serve as a model for desecent with modification.
Anyway, consider your statement: if the apeman was a separate creation from apes and humans, then what purpose does it serve to be created for? To trick us into postulating that humans evolve from primitive apes?
quote:
Also, if evolution is true, the did the first fish that evolved onto dry land have lungs or did it have gills?
Are you aware of teh fact that some fish have lungs and able to breathe air?
™ Version 4.2