The BB is a perfect example of this. There is simply no reason (or meaning) to infer, if one is operating from a position of actual neutrality.
Again, the BB has NOTHING to do with causes. It does not refute or challenge GOD in anyway. It is simply a conclusion based on the evidence.
If you pay attention you will find that there are quite a few theist and even staunch Christians here that support the Big Bang.
Since the worldview of a scientist is typically claimed to be one of agnosticism in regards to theism, a pure scientist in that stripe would infer nothing, because we simply cannot ever know all the facts by his own presupposition.
And that shows again a misunderstanding. Scientists can be theist. They can be Christians.
Science, the practice of Science, the Scientific Method, excludes the supernatural from study only because by definition, it cannot be measured, quantified and observed. GOD is NOT a Natural Force.
If GOD were subject to scientific study GOD would have to be only natural. GOD would have to be nothing but another natural phenomena like magnetism or gravity or light.
Are you saying GOD is not supernatural but just another substance to be codified?
Aslan is not a
Tame Lion