Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,473 Year: 3,730/9,624 Month: 601/974 Week: 214/276 Day: 54/34 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   King David found guilty on all counts.
Brian
Member (Idle past 4981 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 5 of 174 (370683)
12-18-2006 4:38 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by jar
12-18-2006 9:23 AM


So was Bathsheba just a Good Jewish Mother looking out for the interests of her son?
Isn't this putting the cart before the horse?
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by jar, posted 12-18-2006 9:23 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by jar, posted 12-18-2006 5:00 PM Brian has not replied
 Message 8 by Rob, posted 12-19-2006 12:32 AM Brian has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4981 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 20 of 174 (370883)
12-19-2006 12:45 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by jar
12-19-2006 11:47 AM


Re: Why bring it up?
Mainly because Hebrew University brought it up
Do you think that they are being so jolly about it because they know that David didn't exist and that it is the meanings behind the David myths that are important?
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by jar, posted 12-19-2006 11:47 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by jar, posted 12-19-2006 1:05 PM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4981 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 21 of 174 (370884)
12-19-2006 12:53 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Rob
12-19-2006 12:22 AM


It is plain to see! David was a sinner in need of a savior.
You are confusing Christian theology with Jewish theology. Not everyone was a sinner in the OT.
There is no original sin in Judaism, and Jews believe that humans enter the world sin free, but only sin because they are not perfect.
In fact sin had quite a different meaning in many instances in the OT.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Rob, posted 12-19-2006 12:22 AM Rob has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4981 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 25 of 174 (370891)
12-19-2006 1:13 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by jar
12-19-2006 1:05 PM


Re: Why bring it up?
I imagine that like the Exodus Myths, the Conquest of Canaan myths and others there may be some kernel of actual history hidden within.
I think they may well be little kernels in there, and these actual historical kernels do not necessarily need to have involved Israelites.
I'm not so sure about David though.
Anyway im OT no doubt.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by jar, posted 12-19-2006 1:05 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by jar, posted 12-19-2006 1:21 PM Brian has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4981 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 28 of 174 (370908)
12-19-2006 2:04 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Hyroglyphx
12-19-2006 1:18 PM


Re: Trials and tribulations
Right, but why a mock trial for somebody so transparently guilty
To remind people of the story.
To me this mock trial appears as purely didactic exercise.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-19-2006 1:18 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4981 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 57 of 174 (376542)
01-12-2007 5:06 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by Taz
12-19-2006 12:44 PM


Hi,
God was suppose to be all knowing and yet he chose a man that couldn't keep his penis in his pants to be king.
I don't see why God couldn't choose a rake such as David, when you consider that no human is supposed to be perfect.
But, seriously, we can compare David quite easily to the nation of 'Ancient Israel', a nation that repeatedly stuck the finger up to God. Why would an all knowing God pick someone with David's nature to be king, well whey would an all knowing God pick a nation as immoral as 'Ancient Israel'?
If we even considered for a moment that the Book of Judges is accuarte, then it would make the Israelites the most moronic nation on Earth. Could people really be so stupid as to turn their back on God time and time and time again? Skinner's pigeons learned quicker than the Ancient Israelites if the Bible is to be believed.
I think you might be taking David's tales a little too seriously. I think whoever invented King David were thinking similarly to the ancient philosophers who invented Ancient Israel. They invented stories and characters as didactic treatises, to demonstrate to their people that although King David was unworthy, just as the Ancient Israelites were unworthy, God can still choose you to accomplish His plans.
Perhaps David is portrayed this way so that men in that society could identify with him. We already know that their scriptures are full of horrific acts against humanity, we know that they follow a God that condones the murder of women and children, and the rape of young girls, so perhaps the person(s) who invented David had to make him sound realistic to the audience.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Taz, posted 12-19-2006 12:44 PM Taz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by Taz, posted 01-12-2007 9:30 PM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4981 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 59 of 174 (376906)
01-14-2007 10:38 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by Taz
01-12-2007 9:30 PM


Of course I am taking it seriously. Literally billions of people want the rest of us to follow the examples of ancient people.
People want us to have the same morality as that of ancient near eastern peoples? I have never heard of this.
One of my past professors, which was a hebrew scholar, told me that he never understood why people keep wanting us to follow the examples of ancient people when it was obvious that they were savages. Remember the "kill every man, woman, child, and cattle" thing?
But this isn’t what Christianity promotes, in fact it is the complete opposite of what Jesus says in the NT.
These old ”rules of warfare’ were simply par for the course at the time, but they belong in the world of 3000 years ago. Christians do not argue that we should be wiping out whole nations.
Why am I taking this so seriously? Because some people apparently would rather try to justify murder, rape, genocide, and a myriad other crimes committed by the savages of the ancient periods than admit that there is something seriously wrong with killing every man, woman, child, and cattle.
But these people are only arguing this because they have a very weak faith. The idea that something in the Bible is ”wrong’ cannot be computed by their tiny brains. They aren’t even thinking about the question, they are only automatically trotting out a mantra to maintain their delusion that the Bible is from God.
You have to remember that these people are sub-normal and shouldn’t be confused with Christians.
In the past, I have asked the following question: Is it right to kill a 2 year old boy just because he might try to harm Israel in the future? Out of all the fundies on this board, I got one answer from one person. Faith told me that yes it is right to kill a 2 year old toddler just because he might try to harm Israel in the future. It's not Faith that's my main point.
Faith isn’t the full shilling, and she doesn’t care about anyone or anything other than her fairy tale book. She is beyond trying to rationally defend her stance and just distances herself from any responsibility by thinking that if God said or done something then we have no right to question it.
It's all the people that didn't answer at all.
Well I think these people obviously believe that the answer makes their God look bad, but these people are reading the Bible in the wrong context.
Anyway, now you know why I take the king david myth so seriously. Apparently, a lot of people out there think we should model our morality after the savages of the ancients.
But these are very few in number.
However, there are a couple of billion Christians who think we should model our morality on Jesus’ teachings.
Jesus says we should love our neighbours. Yahweh says the Israelites were to invade numerous settlements and slaughter the inhabitants etc.
Something has obviously changed.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by Taz, posted 01-12-2007 9:30 PM Taz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by Taz, posted 01-14-2007 7:23 PM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4981 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 65 of 174 (377148)
01-15-2007 6:28 AM
Reply to: Message 60 by Taz
01-14-2007 7:23 PM


While I don't know the exact figure, I think there more than just a few. Just about around the time of every election period I have to see at least half a dozen church signs that says like "AIDS is punishment for gay people" and "gay marriage is a joke... Leviticus says this and that" on a daily basis.
Somehow, I highly doubt that there are as few of them out there as you think.
It is obviously a bigger problem in your area than it is in Scotland.
If I am not mistaken, you are hinting on what I would interpret as the no true scotsman. Sure, I've met some pretty decent christians in my life. I've also met the bastard ones, and they all seem to say that the decent christians aren't really christians.
No I was more hinting at that these people should be looking at the morals of Jesus rather than the morals of the authors of some ancient Jewish campfire tales.
Personally, I have decided that if someone calls themselves a Christian I believe that they think they are one. However, if I see one of these people blatantly contradicting the teachings of Jesus in the NT, then I no longer consider them to be Christian. It doesn’t mean they aren’t, it just means that I don’t regard them as Christian.
Christians who hearken back to the early days of the Bible appear to forget that there is a new covenant for them now, there is a new deal between them and God, a deal that means loving your neighbour instead of killing him and screwing his widow and/or daughter(s).
I’ve known a lot of horrible people over the years who call themselves Christians, a couple of them have actually been pastors, and American I may add, but, just like you, I have met many very decent Christians who would do anything for anyone and are clearly getting something different out of their faith than these hate mongers you speak of.
I still tutor p/t at uni, and we get quite a lot of religious groups preaching around the uni and in the town centre to some extent. I have heard some horrendous things from these people and, over a post seminar cup of tea, I have shared these things with some of the students who are trainee Church of Scotland ministers, and every single one has been horrified by what some of these groups preach. But they are a tiny minority over here, and they are pitied rather than hated.
All I was getting at is that if these people want to call themselves Christian then they should follow the teachings of the one they take their name from, the one who made the New Covenant or the New Testament with them, and forget the old ways that Jesus message has now superseded.
Sure it has. Fortunately for us, we've won the moral argument against slavery, genocide, etc. No government would stand up in front of the united nations and argue for their right to have slaves and to carry out ethnic cleansing, and yet I can think of at least half a dozen governments in the world that advocate such policy, one of which is a major nuclear power.
Yes, I agree, and this just proves that morality is shoed by society rather than some wee God up in the sky.
Same thing with the christians. Only a hand full (like Faith) would stand up and make an argument for god sanctioned genocides and such.
Faith is retarded though. She doesn’t even care to try and justify why these atrocities are okay with her, unless you can call her robotic following of what she thinks God is some sort of justification. Faith, and those of her ilk, have deep deep psychological problems, and they really should have some sort of therapy. It is a shame.
But think of all the ones that don't say anything at all.
Think of the ones who speak out against it though. Think of the ones who acknowledge that during the time that these stories represent that this was the way ancient societies were. Many Christians realise that these days belong in the past, and that their faith teaches the opposite to these barbarities.
They don't argue for OR against the acts.
Many don’t have the capability to think though, this is the problem, and I think one of the reasons why the USA has so many of these people is the education system out there. Parents seem to be allowed to abuse their kids in the USA by forcing them to believe that 2+2=5, we wont stop these morons who take the Bible literally until they get a better basic education.
Don't know about you, but that tells me something about what they think deep down.
Deep down they want to believe everything in the Bible is true, to the letter, and deep down they probably believe that there is an apologetic somewhere that will justify a certain ”problem’ to them. Just look at the crank apologists that get linked to by Christians here, 99% spend most of their time howling at the moon.
These people know that there is something inherently wrong about slaughtering POW’s and raping the young female survivors, but they cannot be seen to criticise their God. The thing is, if they would educate themselves in the history of the ancient near east they would see that this was a common practise (the ban) carried out by many different groups. They could then accept that perhaps God was instructing them to act in a way that was acceptable at the time, and it was acceptable at the time, although it is frowned upon now.
If they educated themselves they would also know that events such as Jericho simply didn’t even happen.
Notice how I asked a simple question and I haven't gotten a single straight foward answer yet.
Oh you have danced the dance before as have I many times. But you know their answer as well as they do, it is the admitting it that they have the problem with.
Brian.
Edited by Brian, : spelling

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by Taz, posted 01-14-2007 7:23 PM Taz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by Taz, posted 01-15-2007 12:24 PM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4981 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 69 of 174 (377188)
01-15-2007 1:12 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by Taz
01-15-2007 12:24 PM


May be I am just a bad person, but I am getting tired of seeing the following pattern over and over: (1) Make excuses for atrocities, (2) avoid the question, (3) if asked again avoid it again, (4) play dumb and say they don't know what you're talking about hoping you'd let it go or that you don't know which verse to specifically talk about, (5) be dense and say they don't understand what you are talking about, (6) and finally when all else failed just ignore you overall.
This is what we have all been putting up with for years!
It took me a long time to figure out that some people just are not worth arguing with. I would keep asking, asking, asking, with similar results to your own, but after a few years I decided that my time would be better spent on more productive things.
Now, when I have a couple of interchanges with a fundy, if there is no progress I just do my best to ignore them. The lurkers know who the good and the bad guys are, they know who is honest and who isn't and if I do get involved in a prolonged discussion with a fundy it is for the lurkers and not the fundy that I keep dialogue going. We both know that we arent going to make these people change thier mind about anything, but we can help to inform the people reading the posts.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by Taz, posted 01-15-2007 12:24 PM Taz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by Taz, posted 01-15-2007 3:58 PM Brian has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4981 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 77 of 174 (377338)
01-16-2007 11:20 AM
Reply to: Message 76 by riVeRraT
01-16-2007 10:11 AM


Re: model of morality?
but only if you interpret them correctly.
Herein lies an obvious problem, how does anyone know if they have interpreted anything correctly.
There's a danger that the 'correct' interpretation for you is the one that you 'feel' happiest about.
I also have real problems with people who interpret the OT evidence to suit their view of God. A god that murders innocent Egyptian children is a barbarian, whether it is Yahweh, Baal, Chemosh, or any other god.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by riVeRraT, posted 01-16-2007 10:11 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 84 by riVeRraT, posted 01-17-2007 8:49 AM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4981 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 78 of 174 (377340)
01-16-2007 11:24 AM
Reply to: Message 75 by joshua221
01-15-2007 10:42 PM


Re: Let Those Without Sin Cast the First Stone
it's funny and absurd.
What is funny and absurd is your metamorphosis into a mini Kent Hovind. You bleat on about the ills of the world while the hardest thing you have had to do in your life is to try and get two lines of a song to rhyme.
Why don't you ask your God why he sits on his arse all day watching people suffer, then write a song about it on that nice clean paper that mummy and daddy gave you pocket money to buy?
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by joshua221, posted 01-15-2007 10:42 PM joshua221 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by joshua221, posted 01-16-2007 6:30 PM Brian has replied
 Message 81 by joshua221, posted 01-17-2007 1:34 AM Brian has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4981 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 87 of 174 (377518)
01-17-2007 9:46 AM
Reply to: Message 84 by riVeRraT
01-17-2007 8:49 AM


Re: model of morality?
That's histerical Brian. Why would you even care since the bible is nothing more than a fable, and David never even existed.
I suppose it is better than answering the question, but you are getting really good at dodging issues.
I care because I share a world with fruitloops who do believe in God. I care because some of these fruitloops' actions affect my life. One fruitloop in particular has caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people in Iraq, and he is about to do the same in Iran.
I care because I hear asshole fundies on street corners condemning homosexuals, single parents, and people who live together without being married.
I care because moronic theists are abusing their kids by suffocating them with their fairytales, corrupting their minds befire thay are able to think for themselves. Need I go on?
Another totally BS comment, since you don't believe in God, then God did not do those things now, did He?
Jesus.
I am not saying God did anything, I am making a statement that a God who murders innocent children is a barbarian. You are the one that has to deal with whether He is real or not. I know there isnt a God, I know that there was never any Israelites in Egypt during the 2nd millenium BCE.
However, many morons believe that there is a God and that He sent the angel of death at the first passover to slaughter all the innocent first born Egyptian children.
Now, if you believe in that God then you are sick in the head.
So, I am not saying that God did anything, I am saying if you think God exists then you have to deal with the shit that you BELIEVE He has done.
I am sick and tired of people like you blaming God for those things, it is beyond stupid.
Well, it tells us in your Holy Book that He did it, or didn't I interpret it correctly?
But Taz is correct, you will find some embarrassing excuse to justify God slaughtering innocent children. It keeps your wee fantasy intact.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by riVeRraT, posted 01-17-2007 8:49 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by riVeRraT, posted 01-18-2007 9:02 AM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4981 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 88 of 174 (377519)
01-17-2007 10:02 AM
Reply to: Message 80 by joshua221
01-16-2007 6:30 PM


Re: Let Those Without Sin Cast the First Stone
1. You are probably better off financially than me. (Which doesn't matter to me as I have no value in such matters but you seem to hold much significance in it as you have "called me out" for being rich or something stupid like that.)
I am fairly confident that you are rich in relation to the poor suffering people that you bleat on about all the time. So rather than bleat on about it I think that most of us here are saying ”get of your arse and do something about it rather than moaning.’
2. You probably grew up with 2 caring parents.
Only until I was 14.
3. You probably have never wanted to accomplish anything,
Well let me see.
I always wanted to be a teacher, so I studied and earned an honours degree in religious studies/History, and a Diploma in Education, then achieved a Masters Degree in Theology, currently working on a Master of Letters in Archaeological Studies (due to finish September 2008), so I think I have achieved quite a bit so far.
born and have lived without anything to offer, without any ideas, and without any originality.
Well I get emails from all over the world from ex-students telling me how they are doing and how much they enjoyed my classes, so I like to think I have helped a few people along the way.
You probably work at a job just to work at a job.
Teaching really isn’t one of those jobs that you just work at. If your heart isn’t in it then you would soon get sick of it.
4. I called out the ridiculousness of you and everyone else's posts and thoughts so far and all you have to give are some weird insults which unfortunately it seems I have returned to you above.
There is nothing wrong with you disagreeing with me or anyone else, but your tone and reasons for disagreeing isn’t going to win you any friends.
This whole circumstance is so strange, I had given up on EvC and only returned to set something right in one small and insignificant argument. An argument which has been repeated over and over again with different premises to recieve the multitudes of simple statement and counter-statement responses written by people with robotic like qualities which is seen through their posts day by day.
You seem blissfully unaware that your responses are completely robotic, this is the strange thing.
I had realized that there is no thought here through these arguments. And then to top it all off I see these two absurd people talking like they are martyrs for truth and true thought when in actuality they are just the same as the ones who they argue against!
So what is absurd about it? Is it absurd because YOU say it is?
You are not unlike the majority of human beings but only in that you assume a status of being right and true in your ideas and responses to which I had objection.
Everybody believes that they are right and true, difference is, I usually am.
I am unsure as to whether it is better to correct you than to simply not reply.
Well, if I post something that is incorrect then I am happy to be corrected. I don’t have this big ego that means I have to be right. I don’t mind being wrong, I do mind being told I am wrong without any reason. If I am wrong about something then how can I know it is wrong if no one tells me?
I just want to prove that human morality cannot change.
Well you have been proven wrong there mate.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by joshua221, posted 01-16-2007 6:30 PM joshua221 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 91 by Taz, posted 01-17-2007 1:10 PM Brian has not replied
 Message 93 by joshua221, posted 01-17-2007 3:44 PM Brian has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4981 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 102 of 174 (377778)
01-18-2007 10:42 AM
Reply to: Message 97 by joshua221
01-17-2007 11:10 PM


Re: Let Those Without Sin Cast the First Stone
I included those pieces to show Brian and Tazmanian Devil examples of the very things that they are saying don't exist, or are limited.
I never said they didn't exist, I know that they exist to a lesser degree.
You seem to think that just because a few areas still have slavery that peoples' opinions towards slavery havent changed at all.
My point, and I think it is Taz's too, is that many countries have abolished slavery, thus deeming it immoral, hence morality has changed in these groups.
The prevailing attitude of the vast majority of the US and Europe is that slavery is wrong, contrast that to the situation say 3 or 400 years ago and you see a vast difference in attitude. Therefore, this proves that human morality can change.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by joshua221, posted 01-17-2007 11:10 PM joshua221 has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4981 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 105 of 174 (377811)
01-18-2007 1:12 PM
Reply to: Message 99 by riVeRraT
01-18-2007 9:02 AM


Re: model of morality?
Is that God's fault, or some fruitloop named Bush?
According to Bush, God told him to invade Iraq!
I believe in God, and I believe God considers homosexuality a sin, but I find no need to go around telling people that, or hate anyone for it, since we are all sinners. I believe Jesus came to save not judge.
So, where do the people that preach on the street about homosexuality, single parents etc. get their ideas from?
Where do Christians get the idea from that homosexuality is wrong?
Did God do it, or did people do it? Is anyone really innocent? ( re innocent Egyptian children)
Well your Holy Book tells us that He did.
Also, what crime would a baby that is a few minutes old have committed?
It is very hard for me to picture the life of the Old testament,
Really, I find it quite easy, maybe you should read a bit more about it.
I think if your God, and you kill people, you obviously know where they are going afterwards, and I hope that is heaven, or who knows, maybe even hell for a short visit.
Or Hell forever.
It is a shame you have no pity for the parents whose children were taken from them by a petty barbarian.
Is it so bad to leave this life, and travel to the next? Only for those that are left behind. Your problem is that you approach all this without even remotely believing in the afterlife.
Why do I have to believe in the afterlife?
Your problem is that you have to think of excuses to justify what even you really think is abominable behaviour by Yahweh. It doesn’t matter what the afterlife is like, the reason for killing the innocent Egyptian babies is given in the Bible. Yahweh slaughtered tiny babies because the pharaoh wouldn’t let the Hebrews leave Egypt. Now if the only way God can get the Hebrews out of Egypt is to kill little babies then that God is not only sick, but is also a complete moron.
Any god worth his salt could just have blinked the Egyptians out of existence, or transported all the Hebrews out of there with a wave of his ”hand’. But to go through the histrionics of sending plagues then eventually killing countless children is ludicrous.
Even the Son of God had to suffer immensly, so obviously there is a point to it all.
A wee bit of a slap from a couple of Romans, then a few lashes is hardly immense suffering to an immortal being.
You always approach suffering as bad, as do a few others, which is a topic spawned from this story about David. But we always seem to find some good that happens from the bad.
Indeed. It is to do with the resilience of the human race, we know we have to get on with things so we do.
I can deal with the shit He has done, but I won't pretend to know why, and call judgement on it.
But by ignoring why he did things you are justifying horrendous behaviour.
Why would you want to worship a God that slaughters innocent babies? Why would anybody?
The God I believe in, ultimately is a good God,
It takes a great deal of cognitive dissonance to come to this conclusion. All you are doing is making excuses for God. You know in your heart that many of God’s actions, including the atrocities during David’s reign, are completely immoral and make any decent person sick, but are you so desperate for God to be good that you are willing to ignore the texts and make up any excuse to keep that fantasy intact?
You do not get a "get out of bad things in life on earth card" if you start believing in God.
But he intervenes in peoples lives! He brings bad things into your life, if we are to believe the Bible at least.
I didn't,
We have all had shit in our lives, I know I have had more than my fair share, but that is just life, you have to get on with things.
and neither did Jesus, His son.
As I said, a couple of hours on a cross is hardly a great sacrifice for an immortal being. Jesus sacrifice is way overestimated.
I have seen it in my own life, and all the bad things that God has put through has ultimately brought me to God,
Everything will bring you back to God, you are so determined to keep this fantasy alive that you will delude yourself at every opportunity.
and has wound up to make me a better person. I actually thank Him for the bad things that have come to pass, and I have learned from.
Seriously, have you considered therapy of any kind. Can you not see the self delusion you are perpetuating, you are going to believe in God no matter what.
There is no embarassing exuse. God is tough, and you will learn things the hard way from Him wether you accept Him or not, that's life.
No, we free thinkers do not learn anything from God, and the only thing we learn from the Bible is that it is possible to fool some of the people all of the time.
Bored now.
Brian

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by riVeRraT, posted 01-18-2007 9:02 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by riVeRraT, posted 01-19-2007 12:10 AM Brian has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024