But you didn't answer NJ's question about the what the increase or decrese is relative to. You also didn't answer the question of how such a small "poll" can be meaningful.
Because those two are irrelevant.
The questions I asked are simple. The are just yes/no questions.
You can only point to changes in morality over time as I have pointed out in this thread. At the time of the Bible, slavery was considered moral, and that view continued well into the 19
th. Century. The same factors are shown in each of the examples I posted.
The measurement can only be made by those responding at this moment. The readers of this thread, based on their understanding of morality as it stands today, will answer each of those questions.
The audience then will decide whether the moral standard in effect today has increased or decreased relative to morality at some other era and culture.
Nemesis_Juggernaut loves to bring in irrelevancies when faced with a really simple position or question. That has been the tactic of choice throughout this thread and others. The issues you bring up are typical.
First, "what the increase or decrease is relative to".
Throughout the thread it has been pointed out that "relative" refers to what was considered moral in the past but immoral today.
The size of the poll is also irrelevant since it is limited to those reading and responding in this thread.
Further all I said was that NJ agreed that morality is increasing. Since my position is only related to what NJ said, the size of the poll has NOTHING to do with the position.
The questions I asked were answered by Nemesis. In each case he indicated that he thought the current position was more moral than the position held in the past.
Further there have been assertions that there is some absolute morality, yet NO ONE has been able to provide an example of that which held up to examination.
Nemesis is simply playing moving goal posts.
Edited by jar, : appalin spallin
Aslan is not a
Tame Lion